IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijfss/v11y2023i2p63-d1131723.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Restaurants’ Solvency in Portugal during COVID-19

Author

Listed:
  • Conceição Gomes

    (CiTUR Centre for Tourism Research, Development and Innovation, Polytechnic University of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal)

  • Filipa Campos

    (CiTUR Centre for Tourism Research, Development and Innovation, Polytechnic University of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal)

  • Cátia Malheiros

    (CiTUR Centre for Tourism Research, Development and Innovation, Polytechnic University of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal)

  • Luís Lima Santos

    (CiTUR Centre for Tourism Research, Development and Innovation, Polytechnic University of Leiria, 2411-901 Leiria, Portugal)

Abstract

The main purpose of this study is to understand how Portuguese restaurants’ solvency was affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, considering the factors that influence it. Financial information was collected for the years 2019 and 2020 in the SABI database to elaborate a quantitative methodology; a descriptive analysis was used and Pearson’s correlation coefficient, a Paired t -test, a one-way ANOVA test, and a multiple linear regression were used to test the formulated hypotheses. The findings confirm that solvency is affected by several determinants, such as financial autonomy, indebtedness, financial leverage, asset turnover, return on equity, and long-term bank debt. Solvency is influenced positively by financial autonomy and financial leverage. In contrast, solvency is negatively influenced by indebtedness, asset turnover, and long-term bank debt. Additionally, this paper represents the first study, in the restaurant sector in Portugal, which analyses the importance of solvency and its determinants, by facing a normal year with a crisis year. The paper is innovative in terms of knowledge about restaurant solvency behavior in periods of financial crisis and also because the COVID-19 pandemic has added an additional variable to restaurant solvency: short-term bank debt. In terms of theoretical implications, this study provides further insights about the factors influencing solvency in restaurant businesses during periods of a financial crisis. The main practical contributions are linked to improving the leadership skills of restaurant owners and managers to deal with periods of crisis in general, thus improving the solvency of their businesses and decreasing the risks associated with bankruptcy.

Suggested Citation

  • Conceição Gomes & Filipa Campos & Cátia Malheiros & Luís Lima Santos, 2023. "Restaurants’ Solvency in Portugal during COVID-19," IJFS, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:63-:d:1131723
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/11/2/63/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2227-7072/11/2/63/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bao, Zhengyang & Huang, Difang, 2021. "Shadow Banking in a Crisis: Evidence from Fintech During COVID-19," Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Cambridge University Press, vol. 56(7), pages 2320-2355, November.
    2. Díez, Federico J. & Duval, Romain & Maggi, Chiara, 2022. "Supporting SMEs during COVID-19: The case for targeted equity injections," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 219(C).
    3. Alexandra Horobet & Stefania Cristina Curea & Alexandra Smedoiu Popoviciu & Cosmin-Alin Botoroga & Lucian Belascu & Dan Gabriel Dumitrescu, 2021. "Solvency Risk and Corporate Performance: A Case Study on European Retailers," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-34, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jain Mayank & Malik Taniya & Malik Sakshi, 2023. "Deciphering Financial Health and Risk: Hierarchical Relationships and Interdependencies among Key Factors," Acta Universitatis Sapientiae, Economics and Business, Sciendo, vol. 11(1), pages 162-185, October.
    2. Yu, Deshui & Huang, Difang & Chen, Li & Li, Luyang, 2023. "Forecasting dividend growth: The role of adjusted earnings yield," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    3. Fang, Yi & Wang, Qi & Wang, Fan & Zhao, Yang, 2023. "Bank fintech, liquidity creation, and risk-taking: Evidence from China," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 127(C).
    4. Yu, Deshui & Huang, Difang, 2023. "Cross-sectional uncertainty and expected stock returns," Journal of Empirical Finance, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 321-340.
    5. Boyao Wu & Difang Huang & Muzi Chen, 2023. "Estimating contagion mechanism in global equity market with time‐zone effect," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 52(3), pages 543-572, September.
    6. Wang, Jiaxin & Huang, Xiang & Gu, Qiankun & Song, Zilong & Sun, Ruiyi, 2023. "How does fintech affect bank risk? A perspective based on financialized transfer of government implicit debt risk," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    7. Emilia Herman & Kinga-Emese Zsido, 2023. "The Financial Sustainability of Retail Food SMEs Based on Financial Equilibrium and Financial Performance," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-26, August.
    8. Lukic Radojko, 2022. "Employee Costs Of Distribution Trade Of The European Union And Serbia," Business Excellence and Management, Faculty of Management, Academy of Economic Studies, Bucharest, Romania, vol. 12(3), pages 60-76, September.
    9. Tut, Daniel, 2023. "FinTech and the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from electronic payment systems," Emerging Markets Review, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    10. Yiping Huang & Xiang Li & Han Qiu & Changhua Yu, 2023. "Big tech credit and monetary policy transmission: micro-level evidence from China," BIS Working Papers 1084, Bank for International Settlements.
    11. Itzhak Ben-David & Mark J. Johnson & René M. Stulz, 2021. "Why Did Small Business FinTech Lending Dry Up During the COVID-19 Crisis?," NBER Working Papers 29205, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    12. Linn Arnell & Emma Engström & Gazi Salah Uddin & Md. Bokhtiar Hasan & Sang Hoon Kang, 2023. "Volatility spillovers, structural breaks and uncertainty in technology sector markets," Financial Innovation, Springer;Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, vol. 9(1), pages 1-31, December.
    13. Ling, Aifan & Huang, Xinrui & Ling, Boya (Vivye), 2022. "Fund immunity to the COVID-19 pandemic: Evidence from Chinese equity funds," The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    14. Nan Li & Muzi Chen & Difang Huang, 2022. "How Do Logistics Disruptions Affect Rural Households? Evidence from COVID-19 in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-17, December.
    15. Lily Davies & Mark Kattenberg & Benedikt Vogt, 2023. "Predicting Firm Exits with Machine Learning: Implications for Selection into COVID-19 Support and Productivity Growth," CPB Discussion Paper 444, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    16. Athiphat Muthitacharoen & Athiphat Muthitacharoen, 2023. "Digital Fiscal Stimulus and SMEs: Insights from Thailand's Half and Half Program," CESifo Working Paper Series 10711, CESifo.
    17. Boyao Wu & Difang Huang & Muzi Chen, 2024. "Estimating Contagion Mechanism in Global Equity Market with Time-Zone Effect," Papers 2404.04335, arXiv.org.
    18. Brandon Goldstein & Julapa Jagtiani & Catharine Lemieux, 2023. "Did Fintech Loans Default More During the COVID-19 Pandemic? Were Fintech Firms “Cream-Skimming” the Best Borrowers?," Working Papers 23-26, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia.
    19. Huang, Yiping & Li, Xiang & Qiu, Han & Yu, Changhua, 2023. "BigTech credit and monetary policy transmission: Micro-level evidence from China," BOFIT Discussion Papers 2/2023, Bank of Finland Institute for Emerging Economies (BOFIT).
    20. Yuting Tu & Xin Yan & Huan Wang, 2023. "Game Theory Analysis of Chinese DC/EP Loan and Internet Loan Models in the Context of Regulatory Goals," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijfss:v:11:y:2023:i:2:p:63-:d:1131723. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.