IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i9p1401-d1744759.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Recreational Performance Evaluation of Urban Forests: Spatial, Socio-Cultural, and Public Health-Related Perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Zeynep Pirselimoğlu Batman

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, Bursa Uludağ University, 16059 Bursa, Turkey)

  • Elvan Ender Altay

    (Department of Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Agriculture, Bursa Uludağ University, 16059 Bursa, Turkey)

Abstract

Urban forests are natural habitat areas within urban ecosystems that enhance physical, mental, and social well-being. By integrating natural and cultural values into the urban landscape, these areas offer individuals opportunities to interact with nature and engage in various recreational activities. Recreational activities increase physical activity levels, help reduce stress, strengthen mental health, and foster social interaction, thereby significantly protecting and improving public health. This study aims to evaluate the recreational performance of urban forests—an essential component of the urban ecosystem—through a multidimensional approach. In this context, ecological (topography, vegetation, water resources, soil structure, climate), physical (accessibility, infrastructure, area size), social (activity diversity, usage intensity, community events), and cultural (landscape values, urban identity, conservation status of cultural landscapes) factors were considered as key indicators. Bursa Atatürk Urban Forest was selected as the study area, and the methodology integrated SWOT (Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, Threats) analysis with weighted multi-criteria decision-making techniques. In addition, the qualitative data obtained were supported by statistical analysis methods to reveal the relationships among the criteria quantitatively. Through this holistic approach, the recreational performance of the urban forest was evaluated scientifically, leading to the conclusion that the area’s strengths should be preserved, its weaknesses improved, and its cultural landscape values managed sustainably. The study provides a valuable decision-support framework capable of guiding strategic planning for the future.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeynep Pirselimoğlu Batman & Elvan Ender Altay, 2025. "Recreational Performance Evaluation of Urban Forests: Spatial, Socio-Cultural, and Public Health-Related Perspectives," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(9), pages 1-25, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1401-:d:1744759
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1401/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/9/1401/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Enrico Pomatto & Paola Gullino & Silvia Novelli & Marco Devecchi & Federica Larcher, 2023. "Landscape Strategies for Terraced Landscapes in the European Alpine Region Using a Mixed-Method Analysis Tool," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Busra Akgun Piskin & Nilufer Seyidoglu Akdeniz, 2023. "How Can People with Disabilities Use the Outdoors? An Assessment Within the Framework of Disability Standards," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 167(1), pages 153-174, June.
    3. Jones, Benjamin A., 2021. "Planting urban trees to improve quality of life? The life satisfaction impacts of urban afforestation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    4. Riki Tesler & Pnina Plaut & Ronit Endvelt, 2018. "The Effects of an Urban Forest Health Intervention Program on Physical Activity, Substance Abuse, Psychosomatic Symptoms, and Life Satisfaction among Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-12, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chizhi Ma & Weiming Song & Chang Xu, 2023. "Factors Influencing Resident Satisfaction with Afforestation in the Plains: Beijing as a Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-12, April.
    2. Mira Hobeika & Victoria Dawalibi & Georgio Kallas & Alessio Russo, 2024. "Evaluating the Landscape and Ecological Aspects of Urban Planning in Byblos: A Multi-Faceted Approach to Assessing Urban Forests," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-19, April.
    3. Alessio Russo & Wing Tung Chan & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2021. "Estimating Air Pollution Removal and Monetary Value for Urban Green Infrastructure Strategies Using Web-Based Applications," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-17, July.
    4. Lung-Yin Lin & Yu-Shing Chang, 2023. "Can Potted Plants Catch Mosquitoes? Applying Rare-Earth Luminescent Materials and Plant Energy to the Development of Innovative Mosquito-Trapping Potted Plants," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-15, February.
    5. Chuan Li & Liangrong Song, 2022. "Regional Differences and Spatial Convergence of Green Development in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    6. Orit Shapiro & Rachel Nissanholtz Gannot & Gizell Green & Avi Zigdon & Moti Zwilling & Ariela Giladi & Lilach Ben-Meir & Marques Adilson & Sharon Barak & Yossi Harel-Fisch & Riki Tesler, 2022. "Risk Behaviors, Family Support, and Emotional Health among Adolescents during the COVID-19 Pandemic in Israel," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-13, March.
    7. Alessio Russo & Manuel Esperon-Rodriguez & Annick St-Denis & Mark G. Tjoelker, 2025. "Native vs. Non-Native Plants: Public Preferences, Ecosystem Services, and Conservation Strategies for Climate-Resilient Urban Green Spaces," Land, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-22, April.
    8. Abdullah Akpınar, 2019. "Green Exercise: How Are Characteristics of Urban Green Spaces Associated with Adolescents’ Physical Activity and Health?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-16, November.
    9. Galati, Antonino & Coticchio, Alessandro & Peiró-Signes, Ángel, 2023. "Identifying the factors affecting citizens' willingness to participate in urban forest governance: Evidence from the municipality of Palermo, Italy," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    10. Jones, Benjamin A., 2023. "Dust storms and human well-being," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    11. Jun Lee & Dong-Han Kim, 2022. "Urban Forest Visit Motivation Scale: Development and Validation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    12. Alba Miñano-Mañero, 2024. "Trees of green: constructing panels of tree canopy from aerial imagery," Working Papers REM 2024/0352, ISEG - Lisbon School of Economics and Management, REM, Universidade de Lisboa.
    13. Abbate, Simona & Di Paolo, Luca & Carapellucci, Roberto & Cipollone, Roberto, 2021. "Carbon uptake dynamics associated to the management of unused lands for urban CO2 planning," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 178(C), pages 946-959.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:9:p:1401-:d:1744759. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.