IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v22y2025i6p829-d1663363.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Māori Health, Wellbeing, and Disability in Aotearoa New Zealand: A National Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Tristram R. Ingham

    (Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington 6021, New Zealand
    Foundation for Equity and Research New Zealand, Wellington 6012, New Zealand
    Ngāti Kahungunu ki Heretaunga, Ngāti Porou.)

  • Bernadette Huatau Jones

    (Department of Medicine, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington 6021, New Zealand
    Foundation for Equity and Research New Zealand, Wellington 6012, New Zealand
    Ngā Wairiki Ngāti Apa.)

  • Meredith A. Perry

    (School of Physiotherapy, University of Otago, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand)

  • Andrew Sporle

    (Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
    iNZight Analytics Ltd., Auckland 1010, New Zealand
    Ngāti Apa, Rangitane, Te Rarawa.)

  • Tom Elliott

    (Department of Statistics, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
    iNZight Analytics Ltd., Auckland 1010, New Zealand
    Ngāti Whakaue.)

  • Paula Toko King

    (Te Rōpū Rangahau Hauora a Eru Pōmare, Department of Public Health, University of Otago Wellington, Wellington 6021, New Zealand
    Te Aūpouri, Te Rarawa, Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Whatua, Waikato-Tainui, Ngāti Maniapoto.)

  • Gabrielle Baker

    (Baker Consulting Ltd., Wellington 6011, New Zealand
    Ngāpuhi, Ngāti Wairupe-Ngāti Kuri.)

  • Barry Milne

    (COMPASS Research Centre, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand)

  • Tori Diamond

    (iNZight Analytics Ltd., Auckland 1010, New Zealand
    Ngāpuhi.)

  • Linda Waimarie Nikora

    (Ngā Pae o te Māramatanga, University of Auckland, Auckland 1010, New Zealand
    Te Aitanga a Hauiti, Ngāi Tūhoe.)

Abstract

Māori, the Indigenous people of Aotearoa New Zealand, experience wide-ranging inequities compared with non-Māori. This survey aimed to explore the holistic health, wellbeing, and disability experiences of New Zealand’s Indigenous Māori population from a Māori worldview, addressing gaps in culturally relevant data often overlooked by standard health surveys. A robust cross-sectional survey was conducted with 7359 participants of Māori descent using Kaupapa Māori Research principles. Data were analysed using the Te Pae Māhutonga framework, a Māori health promotion model. Participants demonstrated strong cultural identity, with 32.3% understanding spoken Māori fairly well and 97.3% defining a broad non-nuclear concept of whānau (family). While over half reported high life satisfaction, 58.4% experienced discrimination, mainly based on ethnicity and appearance. Access to healthcare revealed that 32.6% were unable to contact a general practitioner due to cost. Socioeconomic challenges were prevalent; nearly a quarter borrowed from family or friends to meet daily living costs, and over a third economized on fresh produce to save money. This study reveals significant gaps in mainstream health data and demonstrates that a culturally aligned, methodological approach is feasible and crucial for informing policies that address the needs and rights of Māori, as guaranteed under Te Tiriti o Waitangi. These results could inform global, indigenous research addressing culturally relevant health, wellbeing and disability inequities.

Suggested Citation

  • Tristram R. Ingham & Bernadette Huatau Jones & Meredith A. Perry & Andrew Sporle & Tom Elliott & Paula Toko King & Gabrielle Baker & Barry Milne & Tori Diamond & Linda Waimarie Nikora, 2025. "Māori Health, Wellbeing, and Disability in Aotearoa New Zealand: A National Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(6), pages 1-31, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:6:p:829-:d:1663363
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/6/829/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/22/6/829/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Skevington, S.M. & Böhnke, J.R., 2018. "How is subjective well-being related to quality of life? Do we need two concepts and both measures?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 206(C), pages 22-30.
    2. Margaret Galt & Chris Nees, 2022. "New Zealand’s wellbeing: Is it sustainable and what are the risks?," Treasury Papers Series tp22/04, New Zealand Treasury.
    3. Ricci B Harris & James Stanley & Donna M Cormack, 2018. "Racism and health in New Zealand: Prevalence over time and associations between recent experience of racism and health and wellbeing measures using national survey data," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(5), pages 1-22, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. František Petrovič & Patrik Maturkanič, 2022. "Urban-Rural Dichotomy of Quality of Life," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-18, July.
    2. Katherine Ellis & Jordan Tewhaiti-Smith & Deborah Munro & Rachael Wood, 2024. "The Perspectives of Māori and Pasifika Mate Kirikōpū (Endometriosis) Patients in Aotearoa New Zealand," Societies, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-21, March.
    3. Hideko Matsuo & Koen Matthijs, 2021. "The life course and subjective well-being across generations – an analysis based on cross-national surveys (2002–2016)," Vienna Yearbook of Population Research, Vienna Institute of Demography (VID) of the Austrian Academy of Sciences in Vienna, vol. 19(1), pages 417-466.
    4. Yan Li, 2024. "Vehicle ownership, sustainable mobility and well-being in rural China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 26(5), pages 12545-12568, May.
    5. John-Kåre Vederhus & Christine Timko & Bente Birkeland & Siri Håvås Haugland & Karin Berle Gabrielsen, 2024. "Validation of an ultra-short global quality of life scale in a large population-based health survey," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(8), pages 1-14, August.
    6. Ania A Drzewiecka, 2023. "From Human Doing to Human Being – The Metacognitive Model for Well-Being Resilience in the Workplace," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(11), pages 1023-1048, November.
    7. Suzanne M Skevington & Kara Schick-Makaroff & Christine Rowland & Anita Molzahn & and the WHOQOL Group, 2024. "Women’s environmental quality of life is key to their overall quality of life and health: Global evidence from the WHOQOL-100," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(10), pages 1-21, October.
    8. Christian WEISMAYER, 2022. "Applied Research in Quality of Life: A Computational Literature Review," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 17(3), pages 1433-1458, June.
    9. Fahmy, Chantal & Mitchell, Meghan M., 2022. "Examining recidivism during reentry: Proposing a holistic model of health and wellbeing," Journal of Criminal Justice, Elsevier, vol. 83(C).
    10. George B Cunningham & Lisa T Wigfall, 2020. "Race, explicit racial attitudes, implicit racial attitudes, and COVID-19 cases and deaths: An analysis of counties in the United States," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-14, November.
    11. Bussière, Clémence & Sirven, Nicolas & Tessier, Philippe, 2021. "Does ageing alter the contribution of health to subjective well-being?," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 268(C).
    12. Kaung Mon Winn & Maame Esi Woode & Gozde Aydin & Gang Chen, 2025. "Systematic Review of Self-Reported Multidimensional Instruments Used to Measure Quality of Life and Subjective Well-Being of Children and Adolescents," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 177(2), pages 671-731, March.
    13. Leane Makey & Meg Parsons & Karen Fisher & Alyssce Te Huna & Mina Henare & Vicky Miru & Millan Ruka & Mikaera Miru, 2022. "(Un)Heard Voices of Ecosystem Degradation: Stories from the Nexus of Settler-Colonialism and Slow Violence," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-27, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:22:y:2025:i:6:p:829-:d:1663363. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.