IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i4p3568-d1071704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Scoping Review of Transgender Policies in the 15 Most Commonly Played UK Professional Sports

Author

Listed:
  • Michael McLarnon

    (Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK)

  • Jane Thornton

    (Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada)

  • Gail Knudson

    (Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia (UBC), Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada)

  • Nigel Jones

    (Medical Department, British Cycling, Manchester M11 4DQ, UK)

  • Danny Glover

    (Medical and Scientific Department, Ladies European Tour (Various), Denham UB9 5PG, UK)

  • Andrew Murray

    (Sport and Exercise, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, UK)

  • Michael Cummings

    (Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK)

  • Neil Heron

    (Centre for Public Health, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast BT12 6BA, UK
    Medical Department, British Cycling, Manchester M11 4DQ, UK
    School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire ST5 5BG, UK)

Abstract

Introduction: There has been much debate recently on the participation of transgender and gender-diverse (TGD) athletes in sport, particularly in relation to fairness, safety and inclusion. The 2021 IOC Framework on Fairness, Inclusion and Non-discrimination acknowledges the central role that eligibility criteria play in ensuring fairness, particularly in the female category, and states that athletes should not be excluded solely on the basis of their TGD identity. Aims: To identify policies that address TGD athlete participation in the 15 major United Kingdom (UK) sporting organisations and to summarise the evidence for each of these policies. Methods: A scoping review of TGD policies from the 15 major UK sporting organisations. Results: Eleven of the governing bodies had publicly available TGD policies. Most of the sporting associations drew guidance from the official 2015 IOC Consensus Meeting on Sex Reassignment and Hyperandrogenism, particularly with regard to physiological testosterone levels. Many organisations referenced their policies as a guide for decision making but stated that they ultimately made case-by-case decisions on an athlete’s eligibility. Relevant considerations not addressed in most policies included pre- versus post-pubertal athletes, justification for testosterone thresholds, the length of time out of competitive action (if any) for transitioning athletes, the irreversible advantage from male puberty (if any), the responsibility for and frequency of follow up for hormonal testing and the consequences for athletes outside set testosterone limits. Conclusions: There is a lack of consensus among the top 15 UK sporting organizations relating to elite sport participation for TGD athletes. It would be useful for sport organizations to work together to develop greater standardization/consensus for TGD athlete policies, taking into consideration fairness, safety and inclusion in each sport.

Suggested Citation

  • Michael McLarnon & Jane Thornton & Gail Knudson & Nigel Jones & Danny Glover & Andrew Murray & Michael Cummings & Neil Heron, 2023. "A Scoping Review of Transgender Policies in the 15 Most Commonly Played UK Professional Sports," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3568-:d:1071704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3568/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/4/3568/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. David B Lipps & Andrzej T Galecki & James A Ashton-Miller, 2011. "On the Implications of a Sex Difference in the Reaction Times of Sprinters at the Beijing Olympics," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 6(10), pages 1-5, October.
    2. Blum, Matthias, 2014. "Estimating male and female height inequality," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 14(C), pages 103-108.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meisel-Roca, Adolfo & Ramírez-Giraldo, María Teresa & Santos-Cárdenas, Daniela, 2019. "Long run relationship between biological well being, and economic development in Colombia," Working papers 24, Red Investigadores de Economía.
    2. James Pettit & Daniel Friedman & Curtis Kephart & Ryan Oprea, 2014. "Software for continuous game experiments," Experimental Economics, Springer;Economic Science Association, vol. 17(4), pages 631-648, December.
    3. Radatz, Laura & Baten, Joerg, 2023. "Measuring Multidimensional Inequality and Conflict in Africa and in a Global Comparison," VfS Annual Conference 2023 (Regensburg): Growth and the "sociale Frage" 277637, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Mark E. McGovern & Aditi Krishna & Victor M. Aguayo & S.V. Subramanian, 2017. "A Review of the Evidence Linking Child Stunting to Economic Outcomes," CHaRMS Working Papers 17-03, Centre for HeAlth Research at the Management School (CHaRMS).
    5. Adolfo Meisel-Roca & María Teresa Ramírez-Giraldo & Daniel Lasso-Jaramillo, 2023. "Gender height dimorphism: An approximation of the living Standards in Colombia, 1920-1990," Investigaciones de Historia Económica - Economic History Research (IHE-EHR), Journal of the Spanish Economic History Association, Asociación Española de Historia Económica, vol. 19(02), pages 124-139.
    6. Ramon Ramon-Muñoz & Josep-Maria Ramon-Muñoz, 2015. "Height and Industrialisation in a City in Catalonia during the Nineteenth Century," UB School of Economics Working Papers 2015/334, University of Barcelona School of Economics.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:4:p:3568-:d:1071704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.