IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i3p1898-d1041912.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Spatial-Temporal Variation and Influencing Factors of Regional Tourism Carbon Emission Efficiency in China Based on Calculating Tourism Value Added

Author

Listed:
  • Jun Liu

    (School of Tourism, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
    Tourism Development and Management Research Center, Hubei Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Fanfan Deng

    (School of Tourism, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China
    Tourism Development and Management Research Center, Hubei Key Research Base of Humanities and Social Sciences, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Ding Wen

    (South China Institute of Environmental Sciences, Ministry of Ecology and Environment, Guangzhou 510530, China)

  • Qian Zhang

    (School of Tourism, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

  • Ye Lin

    (School of Business, Hubei University, Wuhan 430062, China)

Abstract

Tourism-related carbon emission efficiency is an important indicator that reflects the sustainable development of tourism and can better balance the relationship between negative environmental impact and economic value. According to panel data of 30 provincial regions, “the tourism value added coefficient” (not including the Tibet Autonomous Region) in mainland China from 2000 to 2019, we estimate the tourism of each provincial administrative unit carbon emissions, measure the tourism carbon efficiency value, and analyze the measurement results of the change trend, spatial differentiation characteristics, and influencing factors. The results show that (1) the carbon emission efficiency of regional tourism in China increased significantly from 2000 to 2019, but there was a significant difference in the carbon emission efficiency of tourism among regions, and the sustainable development level of regional tourism was still unbalanced. (2) The spatial pattern of provincial administrative units in China has the adjacent characteristics of High-High agglomeration and Low-Low agglomeration, the difference in the tourism eco-efficiency development level among regions gradually decreases with time, and there is a dynamic convergence characteristic. (3) The q value represents the intensity of the impact factor on tourism carbon emission efficiency. According to the q value, the factors affecting tourism carbon emission efficiency were divided into dominant factors (0.5 ≤ q ≤ 1), inducing factors (0.2 ≤ q < 0.5) and driving factors (0 ≤ q < 0.2), among which the level of technological development was the dominant factor. The level of opening-up to the outside world is the inducing factor; environmental regulation intensity, urbanization level, regional economic development level, tourism industry environment, and tourism infrastructure are the driving factors. (4) The influence degree of influencing factors on the spatial differentiation of tourism carbon emission efficiency is significantly different in different periods. The degree of influence of the urbanization level and tourism industry environment shows an upward trend over time, and the influence degree of other factors shows a “V-shaped” trend. (5) The two-factor interaction will significantly enhance the spatial differentiation of regional tourism carbon emission efficiency, and the interaction between the level of scientific and technological innovation and other influencing factors has a deeper impact on tourism carbon emission efficiency.

Suggested Citation

  • Jun Liu & Fanfan Deng & Ding Wen & Qian Zhang & Ye Lin, 2023. "Spatial-Temporal Variation and Influencing Factors of Regional Tourism Carbon Emission Efficiency in China Based on Calculating Tourism Value Added," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-20, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1898-:d:1041912
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1898/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/3/1898/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gössling, Stefan & Peeters, Paul & Ceron, Jean-Paul & Dubois, Ghislain & Patterson, Trista & Richardson, Robert B., 2005. "The eco-efficiency of tourism," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 54(4), pages 417-434, September.
    2. Manfred Lenzen & Ya-Yen Sun & Futu Faturay & Yuan-Peng Ting & Arne Geschke & Arunima Malik, 2018. "The carbon footprint of global tourism," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(6), pages 522-528, June.
    3. Jianping Zha & Rong Fan & Yao Yao & Lamei He & Yuanyuan Meng, 2021. "Framework for accounting for tourism carbon emissions in China: An industrial linkage perspective," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(7), pages 1430-1460, November.
    4. Tang, Zi, 2015. "An integrated approach to evaluating the coupling coordination between tourism and the environment," Tourism Management, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 11-19.
    5. Song, Malin & Li, Hui, 2019. "Estimating the efficiency of a sustainable Chinese tourism industry using bootstrap technology rectification," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 45-54.
    6. Manfred Lenzen & Ya-Yen Sun & Futu Faturay & Yuan-Peng Ting & Arne Geschke & Arunima Malik, 2018. "Author Correction: The carbon footprint of global tourism," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 8(6), pages 544-544, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Liguo Wang & Guodong Jia, 2023. "Spatial Spillover and Threshold Effects of High-Quality Tourism Development on Carbon Emission Efficiency of Tourism under the “Double Carbon” Target: Case Study of Jiangxi, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-21, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Dalia Perkumienė & Rasa Pranskūnienė & Milita Vienažindienė & Jurgita Grigienė, 2020. "The Right to A Clean Environment: Considering Green Logistics and Sustainable Tourism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Bing Xia & Suocheng Dong & Zehong Li & Minyan Zhao & Dongqi Sun & Wenbiao Zhang & Yu Li, 2022. "Eco-Efficiency and Its Drivers in Tourism Sectors with Respect to Carbon Emissions from the Supply Chain: An Integrated EEIO and DEA Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-26, June.
    3. Chaogao An & Polat Muhtar & Zhenquan Xiao, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Evolution of Tourism Eco-Efficiency in Major Tourist Cities in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-20, October.
    4. Osorio, Pilar & Cadarso, María-Ángeles & Tobarra, María-Ángeles & García-Alaminos, Ángela, 2023. "Carbon footprint of tourism in Spain: Covid-19 impact and a look forward to recovery," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 303-318.
    5. Lingling Chen & Lin Yi & Rongrong Cai & Hui Yang, 2022. "Spatiotemporal Characteristics of the Correlation among Tourism, CO 2 Emissions, and Economic Growth in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-31, July.
    6. Wei Zhang & Ying Zhan & Ruiyang Yin & Xunbo Yuan, 2022. "The Tourism Eco-Efficiency Measurement and Its Influencing Factors in the Yellow River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-14, November.
    7. Xiaopeng Si & Zi Tang, 2024. "Assessment of low-carbon tourism development from multi-aspect analysis: A case study of the Yellow River Basin, China," Papers 2402.11579, arXiv.org.
    8. Run Liu & Ziyue Qiu, 2022. "Urban Sustainable Development Empowered by Cultural and Tourism Industries: Using Zhenjiang as an Example," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-15, October.
    9. Chlupsa, Christian & Dietert, Tilko & Flori, Heiko & Herbrand, Marc & Istok, Ferdinand & Kocagöz, Orhan & Kraus, Hans & Ladnar, Nadine & Mendler, Josef & Mörtl, Timo & Ranig, Ragna & Rühl, Alexander &, 2023. "Nachhaltige Mobilität der Zukunft," KCFM Schriftenreihe, FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, KCFM KompetenzCentrum für Future Mobility, volume 1, number 1 edited by FOM Hochschule für Oekonomie & Management, KCFM KompetenzCentrum für Future Mobility.
    10. Talwar, Shalini & Kaur, Puneet & Escobar, Octavio & Lan, Sai, 2022. "Virtual reality tourism to satisfy wanderlust without wandering: An unconventional innovation to promote sustainability," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 128-143.
    11. Natalia Porto & Matías Ciaschi, 2021. "Reformulating the tourism-extended environmental Kuznets curve: A quantile regression analysis under environmental legal conditions," Tourism Economics, , vol. 27(5), pages 991-1014, August.
    12. Pipatpong Fakfare & Walanchalee Wattanacharoensil, 2023. "Low‐carbon tourism for island destinations: A crucial alternative for sustainable development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 180-197, February.
    13. Nicholas Apergis & Konstantinos Gavriilidis & Rangan Gupta, 2023. "Does climate policy uncertainty affect tourism demand? Evidence from time-varying causality tests," Tourism Economics, , vol. 29(6), pages 1484-1498, September.
    14. Ti-An Chen, 2022. "Business Performance Evaluation for Tourism Factory: Using DEA Approach and Delphi Method," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Cathrine Linnes & Jerome Agrusa & Giulio Ronzoni & Joseph Lema, 2022. "What Tourists Want, a Sustainable Paradise," Tourism and Hospitality, MDPI, vol. 3(1), pages 1-20, February.
    16. Uktam Umurzakov & Shakhnoza Tosheva & Raufhon Salahodjaev, 2023. "Tourism and Sustainable Economic Development: Evidence from Belt and Road Countries," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 14(1), pages 503-516, March.
    17. Tribe, John & Paddison, Brendan, 2023. "Critical tourism strategy," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    18. Sun, Ya-Yen & Cadarso, Maria Angeles & Driml, Sally, 2020. "Tourism carbon footprint inventories: A review of the environmentally extended input-output approach," Annals of Tourism Research, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    19. Md. Hasanur Rahman & Liton Chandra Voumik & Md. Jamsedul Islam & Md. Abdul Halim & Miguel Angel Esquivias, 2022. "Economic Growth, Energy Mix, and Tourism-Induced EKC Hypothesis: Evidence from Top Ten Tourist Destinations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-16, December.
    20. Navneel Shalendra Prasad & Nikeel Nishkar Kumar, 2022. "Resident Perceptions of Environment and Economic Impacts of Tourism in Fiji," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-20, April.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:3:p:1898-:d:1041912. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.