IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v20y2023i10p5823-d1147115.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Representation of Children’s Participation in Guidelines for Planning and Designing Public Playspaces: A Scoping Review with “Best Fit” Framework Synthesis

Author

Listed:
  • Rianne Jansens

    (Department of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87 Luleå, Sweden
    Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University College Cork, T12 AK54 Cork, Ireland)

  • Maria Prellwitz

    (Department of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87 Luleå, Sweden)

  • Alexandra Olofsson

    (Department of Health, Education and Technology, Luleå University of Technology, 971 87 Luleå, Sweden)

  • Helen Lynch

    (Department of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, University College Cork, T12 AK54 Cork, Ireland)

Abstract

For children, meaningful participation in community life includes being able to access places for play. Such community playspaces are potentially important for all children, including those with disabilities. Yet, children are rarely asked for their views on the design of playspaces, which can further contribute to exclusionary practices and undermine children’s rights to share their views on matters that affect them. In this scoping review, we aim to analyze guidelines and identify strategies for supporting children’s participation rights when planning public playspaces. Guidelines are practical tools used by local policymakers when creating community playspaces, which are important sites for children’s outdoor play. In total, forty-two guidelines were identified that addressed children’s participation rights, along with community involvement. Qualitative evidence synthesis with a “best fit” framework approach was used, informed by Lundy’s model of children’s participation. The findings revealed the importance of initial community involvement as a critical prerequisite. Strategies for children’s participation mostly concerned “ space and voice ” (for children of diverse abilities), with little attention paid to giving their views due weight. This evidence shows that there is a significant gap in knowledge surrounding policy development and implementation to support adults and children to cooperate equally in designing playspaces. Future directions for research in children’s participation require a focus on combined community–children participation approaches in public playspace design. Such work could strengthen and facilitate the role of adults as bearers of the duty to implement the rights of children. This review generated inclusive strategies in planning public playspaces, which could support local policymakers in this complex multi-layered process.

Suggested Citation

  • Rianne Jansens & Maria Prellwitz & Alexandra Olofsson & Helen Lynch, 2023. "The Representation of Children’s Participation in Guidelines for Planning and Designing Public Playspaces: A Scoping Review with “Best Fit” Framework Synthesis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(10), pages 1-21, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:10:p:5823-:d:1147115
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5823/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/20/10/5823/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alice Moore & Helen Lynch & Bryan Boyle, 2022. "A national study of playground professionals universal design implementation practices," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 47(5), pages 611-627, July.
    2. Lisa Stafford, 2017. "Journeys to play: planning considerations to engender inclusive playspaces," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(1), pages 33-46, January.
    3. Checkoway, Barry, 2011. "What is youth participation?," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 33(2), pages 340-345, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Thomas Morgenthaler & Christina Schulze & Duncan Pentland & Helen Lynch, 2023. "Environmental Qualities That Enhance Outdoor Play in Community Playgrounds from the Perspective of Children with and without Disabilities: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(3), pages 1-30, January.
    2. Pritzker, Suzanne & LaChapelle, Alicia & Tatum, Jeremy, 2012. "“We need their help”: Encouraging and discouraging adolescent civic engagement through Photovoice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 34(11), pages 2247-2254.
    3. Gazit, Matan & Perry-Hazan, Lotem, 2020. "Disadvantaged youth’s participation in collective decision making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    4. Miller, J. Jay & Donohue-Dioh, Jessica & Duron, Jacquelynn F. & Geiger, Jennifer M., 2019. "Examining legal representation for foster youth: Perspectives of foster parents," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 1-1.
    5. Nir, Tal & Perry-Hazan, Lotem, 2016. "The framed right to participate in municipal youth councils and its educational impact," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 174-183.
    6. Naseem, Farhat, 2020. "The role of Youth Leadership Development Program: The case of immigrant communities in Canada," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    7. Heejin Han & Sang Wuk Ahn, 2020. "Youth Mobilization to Stop Global Climate Change: Narratives and Impact," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-23, May.
    8. Gal, Tali, 2017. "An ecological model of child and youth participation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 57-64.
    9. Richards-Schuster, Katie & Timmermans, Rebecca, 2017. "Conceptualizing the role of adults within youth-adult partnerships: An example from practice," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 284-292.
    10. Nybell, Lynn M., 2013. "Locating “youth voice:” Considering the contexts of speaking in foster care," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(8), pages 1227-1235.
    11. Yunita, Sekar A.W. & Soraya, Emma & Maryudi, Ahmad, 2018. "“We are just cheerleaders”: Youth's views on their participation in international forest-related decision-making fora," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 88(C), pages 52-58.
    12. Augsberger, Astraea & Collins, Mary Elizabeth & Gecker, Whitney & Lusk, Katharine & Zhao, Qianqian Jane, 2017. "“She treated us like we bring valid ideas to the table:” Youth experiences of a youth-led participatory budgeting process," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 243-249.
    13. Perry-Hazan, Lotem, 2016. "Children's participation in national policymaking: “You're so adorable, adorable, adorable! I'm speechless; so much fun!”," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 67(C), pages 105-113.
    14. Walker, Janet S. & Masselli, Brianne M. & Blakeslee, Jennifer & Baird, Caitlin & Thorp, Kristin, 2018. "Development and testing of an assessment of youth/young adult voice in agency-level advising and decision making," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 94(C), pages 598-605.
    15. Park, Sunggeun (Ethan) & Powers, Jenna & Okpych, Nathanael J. & Courtney, Mark E., 2020. "Predictors of foster youths’ participation in their transitional independent living plan (TILP) development: Calling for collaborative case plan decision-making processes," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    16. Checkoway, Barry & Aldana, Adriana, 2013. "Four forms of youth civic engagement for diverse democracy," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(11), pages 1894-1899.
    17. Laura E. Smith & Veronique Gosselin & Patricia Collins & Katherine L. Frohlich, 2022. "A Tale of Two Cities: Unpacking the Success and Failure of School Street Interventions in Two Canadian Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-17, September.
    18. Ramey, Heather L. & Rose-Krasnor, Linda, 2015. "The new mentality: Youth–adult partnerships in community mental health promotion," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 28-37.
    19. Coates, Dominiek & Howe, Deborah, 2014. "The importance and benefits of youth participation in mental health settings from the perspective of the headspace Gosford Youth Alliance in Australia," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 294-299.
    20. Havlicek, Judy & Curry, Ashley & Villalpando, Fabiola, 2018. "Youth participation in foster youth advisory boards: Perspectives of facilitators," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 84(C), pages 255-270.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:20:y:2023:i:10:p:5823-:d:1147115. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.