IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i6p3602-d773988.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Emotion Regulation in Adolescents: Evidence of the Validity and Factor Structure of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ)

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Betegón

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Valladolid (UVa), Recognized Research Group (GIR) Psychology and Health, 47011 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Jairo Rodríguez-Medina

    (Department of Pedagogy, Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Valladolid (UVa), Recognized Research Group (GIR) Psychology and Health, 47011 Valladolid, Spain)

  • Macarena del-Valle

    (Institute of Basic and Applied Psychology and Technology (IPSIBAT), National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), National University of Mar del Plata (UNMDP), Recognized Research Group (GIR) Psychology and Health, Mar del Plata 7600, Argentina)

  • María Jesús Irurtia

    (Department of Psychology, Faculty of Education and Social Work, University of Valladolid (UVa), Recognized Research Group (GIR) Psychology and Health, 47011 Valladolid, Spain)

Abstract

The Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ) is an assessment tool to evaluate cognitive emotion regulation strategies. The main objective of this study is to provide new empirical evidence about the validity and reliability of the CERQ via a sample of 271 Spanish adolescents (136 female, 135 male) aged from 15 to 18 years (M = 15.7, SD = 0.76). The analytical process was carried out in two phases. A confirmatory factor analysis was performed on the polychoric correlation matrix between items. Four possible alternative models were contrasted: two models with nine factors and two models with two second-order factors and nine first-order factors, with 36 and 27 items, respectively. The model with nine correlated factors and 27 items obtained the best indices of overall fit. Subsequently, the reliability of the measurements was estimated on this model. The results reaffirm the validity of the 27-item version of the CERQ over the original 36-item structure. The findings also confirm that the CERQ is a reliable instrument for the evaluation of emotion regulation strategies in adolescents.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Betegón & Jairo Rodríguez-Medina & Macarena del-Valle & María Jesús Irurtia, 2022. "Emotion Regulation in Adolescents: Evidence of the Validity and Factor Structure of the Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-14, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3602-:d:773988
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3602/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/6/3602/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. William Revelle & Richard Zinbarg, 2009. "Coefficients Alpha, Beta, Omega, and the glb: Comments on Sijtsma," Psychometrika, Springer;The Psychometric Society, vol. 74(1), pages 145-154, March.
    2. Rosseel, Yves, 2012. "lavaan: An R Package for Structural Equation Modeling," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 48(i02).
    3. S. Balzarotti & F. Biassoni & D. Villani & A. Prunas & P. Velotti, 2016. "Individual Differences in Cognitive Emotion Regulation: Implications for Subjective and Psychological Well-Being," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 125-143, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sai-fu Fung & Esther Oi-wah Chow & Chau-kiu Cheung, 2020. "Development and Evaluation of the Psychometric Properties of a Brief Wisdom Development Scale," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-14, April.
    2. Sam S. S. Lau & Cherry C. Y. Ho & Rebecca C. K. Pang & Susan Su & Heather Kwok & Sai-fu Fung & Roger C. Ho, 2022. "COVID-19 Burnout Subject to the Dynamic Zero-COVID Policy in Hong Kong: Development and Psychometric Evaluation of the COVID-19 Burnout Frequency Scale," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-13, July.
    3. Beatriz Talavera-Velasco & Lourdes Luceño-Moreno & Jesús Martín García & Daniel Vázquez-Estévez, 2018. "DECORE-21: Assessment of occupational stress in police. Confirmatory factor analysis of the original model," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(10), pages 1-11, October.
    4. Piotr Koc, 2021. "Measuring Non-electoral Political Participation: Bi-factor Model as a Tool to Extract Dimensions," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 156(1), pages 271-287, July.
    5. María José Baeza-Rivera & Camila Salazar-Fernández & Diego Manríquez-Robles & Natalia Salinas-Oñate & Vanessa Smith-Castro, 2022. "Acculturative Stress, Perceived Social Support, and Mental Health: The Mediating Effect of Negative Emotions Associated with Discrimination," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-17, December.
    6. Cristina Segura-Garcia & Matteo Aloi & Elvira Anna Carbone & Filippo Antonio Staltari & Marianna Rania & Maria Cristina Papaianni & Mikel Vaquero-Solís & Miguel Ángel Tapia-Serrano & Pedro Antonio Sán, 2023. "Development, Validation, and Measurement Invariance of the Body Image Bidimensional Assessment (BIBA) in Italian and Spanish Children and Early Adolescent Samples," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-14, February.
    7. Myszkowski, Nils & Storme, Martin, 2018. "A snapshot of g? Binary and polytomous item-response theory investigations of the last series of the Standard Progressive Matrices (SPM-LS)," Intelligence, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 109-116.
    8. Marius Leckelt & Eunike Wetzel & Tanja M. Gerlach & Robert A. Ackerman & Joshua D. Miller & William J. Chopik & Lars Penke & Katharina Geukes & Albrecht C. P. Küfner & Roos Hutteman & David Richter & , 2016. "Validation of the Narcissistic Admiration and Rivalry Questionnaire Short Scale (NARQ-S) in Convenience and Representative Samples," SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research 884, DIW Berlin, The German Socio-Economic Panel (SOEP).
    9. José Luis Aparicio-Herguedas & Antonio Fraile-Aranda & Jairo Rodríguez-Medina, 2023. "Teaching skills in physical education teacher training: theoretical and factor models," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 10(1), pages 1-8, December.
    10. Sai-fu Fung & Annis Lai Chu Fung, 2020. "Development and evaluation of the psychometric properties of a brief parenting scale (PS-7) for the parents of adolescents," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(1), pages 1-15, January.
    11. Sonia Nawrocka & Hans De Witte & Margherita Pasini & Margherita Brondino, 2023. "A Person-Centered Approach to Job Insecurity: Is There a Reciprocal Relationship between the Quantitative and Qualitative Dimensions of Job Insecurity?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(7), pages 1-27, March.
    12. Md. Mominur Rahman & Bilkis Akhter, 2021. "The impact of investment in human capital on bank performance: evidence from Bangladesh," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 7(1), pages 1-13, December.
    13. Masashi Soga & Kevin J. Gaston & Yuichi Yamaura & Kiyo Kurisu & Keisuke Hanaki, 2016. "Both Direct and Vicarious Experiences of Nature Affect Children’s Willingness to Conserve Biodiversity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-12, May.
    14. César Merino-Soto & Gina Chávez-Ventura & Verónica López-Fernández & Guillermo M. Chans & Filiberto Toledano-Toledano, 2022. "Learning Self-Regulation Questionnaire (SRQ-L): Psychometric and Measurement Invariance Evidence in Peruvian Undergraduate Students," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-17, September.
    15. Silvia Cristina Da Costa Dutra & Xavier Oriol Granado & Darío Paéz-Rovira & Virginia Díaz & Claudia Carrasco-Dajer & Alicia Izquierdo, 2023. "Emotion Regulation Strategies in Educational, Work and Sport Contexts: An Approach in Five Countries," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(19), pages 1-24, September.
    16. Anne-Catherine Guio & David Gordon & Eric Marlier & Hector Najera & Marco Pomati, 2018. "Towards an EU measure of child deprivation," Child Indicators Research, Springer;The International Society of Child Indicators (ISCI), vol. 11(3), pages 835-860, June.
    17. Nathaniel Oliver Iotti & Damiano Menin & Tomas Jungert, 2022. "Early Adolescents’ Motivations to Defend Victims of Cyberbullying," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-9, July.
    18. Peter Tavel & Bibiana Jozefiakova & Peter Telicak & Jana Furstova & Michal Puza & Natalia Kascakova, 2022. "Psychometric Analysis of the Shortened Version of the Spiritual Well-Being Scale on the Slovak Population (SWBS-Sk)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-12, January.
    19. Gaetano Martino & Giulia Giacchè & Enrica Rossetti, 2016. "Organizing the Co-Production of Health and Environmental Values in Food Production: The Constitutional Processes in the Relationships between Italian Solidarity Purchasing Groups and Farmers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(4), pages 1-22, March.
    20. Samuel Mayanja & Joseph M. Ntayi & John C. Munene & Waswa Balunywa & James R. K. Kagaari, 2021. "Informational differences and entrepreneurial networking among small and medium enterprises in Uganda," Journal of Global Entrepreneurship Research, Springer;UNESCO Chair in Entrepreneurship, vol. 11(1), pages 563-577, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:6:p:3602-:d:773988. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.