IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i5p2797-d760279.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrating Human Barriers in Human Reliability Analysis: A New Model for the Energy Sector

Author

Listed:
  • Dina Guglielmi

    (Department of Educational Science, University of Bologna, Viale Filippo Re 6, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Alessio Paolucci

    (Department of Educational Science, University of Bologna, Viale Filippo Re 6, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Valerio Cozzani

    (LISES—Department of Civil, Chemical, Environmental and Materials Engineering, University of Bologna, Via Terracini 28, 40131 Bologna, Italy)

  • Marco Giovanni Mariani

    (Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Via Berti Pichat 5, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Luca Pietrantoni

    (Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Via Berti Pichat 5, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

  • Federico Fraboni

    (Department of Psychology, University of Bologna, Via Berti Pichat 5, 40126 Bologna, Italy)

Abstract

Human reliability analysis (HRA) is a major concern for organizations. While various tools, methods, and instruments have been developed by the scientific community to assess human error probability, few of them actually consider human factors impact in their analysis. The active role that workers have in shaping their own performance should be taken into account in order to understand the causal factors that may lead to errors while performing a task and identifying which human factors may prevent errors from occurring. In line with this purpose, the aim of this study is to present a new methodology for the assessment of human reliability. The proposed model relies on well-known HRA methodologies (such as SPAR-H and HEART) and integrates them in a unified framework in which human factors assume the role of safety barriers against human error. A test case of the new method was carried out in a logistics hub of an energy company. Our results indicate that human factors play a significant role in preventing workers from making errors while performing tasks by reducing human error probability. The limits and implications of the study are discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Dina Guglielmi & Alessio Paolucci & Valerio Cozzani & Marco Giovanni Mariani & Luca Pietrantoni & Federico Fraboni, 2022. "Integrating Human Barriers in Human Reliability Analysis: A New Model for the Energy Sector," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-17, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2797-:d:760279
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2797/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/5/2797/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kariuki, S.G. & Löwe, K., 2007. "Integrating human factors into process hazard analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 92(12), pages 1764-1773.
    2. Marco Giovanni Mariani & Michela Vignoli & Rita Chiesa & Francesco Saverio Violante & Dina Guglielmi, 2019. "Improving Safety through Non-Technical Skills in Chemical Plants: The Validity of a Questionnaire for the Self-Assessment of Workers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-14, March.
    3. Laumann, Karin & Rasmussen, Martin, 2016. "Suggested improvements to the definitions of Standardized Plant Analysis of Risk-Human Reliability Analysis (SPAR-H) performance shaping factors, their levels and multipliers and the nominal tasks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 287-300.
    4. Wang, Lijing & Wang, Yanlong & Chen, Yingchun & Pan, Xing & Zhang, Wenjin, 2020. "Performance shaping factors dependence assessment through moderating and mediating effect analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Jianqiao & Zou, Yanhua & Wang, Wei & Zio, Enrico & Yuan, Chengwei & Wang, Taorui & Jiang, Jianjun, 2022. "A Bayesian belief network framework for nuclear power plant human reliability analysis accounting for dependencies among performance shaping factors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    2. Catelani, Marcantonio & Ciani, Lorenzo & Guidi, Giulia & Patrizi, Gabriele, 2021. "An enhanced SHERPA (E-SHERPA) method for human reliability analysis in railway engineering," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    3. Zarei, Esmaeil & Khan, Faisal & Abbassi, Rouzbeh, 2021. "Importance of human reliability in process operation: A critical analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    4. Xiaoyan Yi & Qinqi Zou & Zewei Zhang & Sheng-Han-Erin Chang, 2023. "What Motivates Greenhouse Vegetable Farmers to Adapt Organic-Substitute-Chemical-Fertilizer (OSCF)? An Empirical Study from Shandong, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Burns, Kevin & Bonaceto, Craig, 2020. "An empirically benchmarked human reliability analysis of general aviation," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    6. Zhang, Yan & Wang, Yu-Hao & Zhao, Xu & Tong, Rui-Peng, 2023. "Dynamic probabilistic risk assessment of emergency response for intelligent coal mining face system, case study: Gas overrun scenario," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 85(PB).
    7. Vincenza Capone & Roberta Borrelli & Leda Marino & Giovanni Schettino, 2022. "Mental Well-Being and Job Satisfaction of Hospital Physicians during COVID-19: Relationships with Efficacy Beliefs, Organizational Support, and Organizational Non-Technical Skills," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. Daniela Converso & Andreina Bruno & Vincenza Capone & Lara Colombo & Alessandra Falco & Teresa Galanti & Damiano Girardi & Gloria Guidetti & Sara Viotti & Barbara Loera, 2021. "Working during a Pandemic between the Risk of Being Infected and/or the Risks Related to Social Distancing: First Validation of the SAPH@W Questionnaire," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-14, June.
    9. Martina Morando & Leonardo Brullo, 2022. "Promoting Safety Climate Training for Migrant Workers through Non-Technical Skills: A Step Forward to Inclusion," Merits, MDPI, vol. 2(1), pages 1-20, February.
    10. Winatha, Arvin, 2020. "Konsep Contingency serta Peranan Moderating dan Mediating Variable dalam FP," OSF Preprints 83j5r, Center for Open Science.
    11. Lita, Amanda Dara, 2020. "Penjabaran Teori Kontingensi dan Pengaruh Suatu Moderating Variable Terhadap Suatu Model Serta Peran Mediating Effect Dalam Suatu Perusahaan," OSF Preprints y48kz, Center for Open Science.
    12. Junqiao Zhang & Xuebo Chen & Qiubai Sun, 2019. "A Safety Performance Assessment Framework for the Petroleum Industry’s Sustainable Development Based on FAHP-FCE and Human Factors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(13), pages 1-20, June.
    13. amien, haqqan, 2020. "Efek Mediasi Terhadap Kepuasan Kinerja Karyawan Dengan Hubungan Kepemimpinan Yang Efektif Dalam Situasi Tertentu," OSF Preprints zytvj, Center for Open Science.
    14. Taylor, Claire & Øie, Sondre & Gould, Kristian, 2020. "Lessons learned from applying a new HRA method for the petroleum industry," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    15. Palmer, C. & Chung, P.W.H., 2009. "An automated system for batch hazard and operability studies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(6), pages 1095-1106.
    16. Alessio Paolucci & Sergio Sangiorgi & Marco Giovanni Mariani, 2021. "Non-Technical Skills in Social Networks: The Spread of Safety Communication and Teamwork in a Warehouse," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-13, January.
    17. Patriarca, Riccardo & Ramos, Marilia & Paltrinieri, Nicola & Massaiu, Salvatore & Costantino, Francesco & Di Gravio, Giulio & Boring, Ronald Laurids, 2020. "Human reliability analysis: Exploring the intellectual structure of a research field," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    18. Zhou, Jian-Lan & Tu, Ren-Fang & Xiao, Hai, 2022. "Large-scale group decision-making to facilitate inter-rater reliability of human-factors analysis for the railway system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    19. Park, Jinkyun & Jung, Wondea, 2015. "Comparing cultural profiles of MCR operators with those of non-MCR operators working in domestic Nuclear Power Plants," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 146-156.
    20. Selvik, Jon T. & Bellamy, Linda J., 2020. "Addressing human error when collecting failure cause information in the oil and gas industry: A review of ISO 14224:2016," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:5:p:2797-:d:760279. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.