IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i19p12312-d927600.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Barriers and Facilitators to Participating in an Exercise Referral Scheme among Women Living in a Low Socioeconomic Area in Australia: A Qualitative Investigation Using the COM-B and Theoretical Domains Framework

Author

Listed:
  • Grace McKeon

    (Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia
    School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Chiara Mastrogiovanni

    (Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

  • Megan Teychenne

    (Institute for Physical Activity and Nutrition (IPAN), School of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, Deakin University, Geelong, VIC 3217, Australia)

  • Simon Rosenbaum

    (Discipline of Psychiatry and Mental Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia)

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the health benefits of regular physical activity, women experiencing socioeconomic disadvantage are at high risk of inactivity. Reasons are multifactorial but likely include broad structural and contextual factors, e.g., lack of access to physical activity programs, as well as individual and interpersonal factors, e.g., lack of motivation and childcaring responsibilities. Few studies among women of low socioeconomic position (SEP) have explored these factors in-depth, yet an understanding of these factors can help inform the development and improve the uptake of exercise referral schemes. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) and COM-B model (capability, opportunity, motivation and behaviour) were employed to understand behaviours for intervention development. Therefore, using these behaviour change models, this study aimed to explore the barriers and facilitators influencing the use of an exercise referral scheme among women living in a socioeconomically disadvantaged area. Methods: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with women who had registered with a free exercise referral scheme (Live Life Get Active) and living in a low socioeconomic neighbourhood in Sydney, Australia. Reflexive thematic analysis and framework analysis were used to allow naturally identified themes to be determined and then allocated to theoretically driven domains. Results: Nine women were interviewed (aged 30–69 years). Eighteen themes were identified and mapped directly on to the six COM-B constructs. The most reported barriers to using the physical activity referral scheme related to the opportunity construct of the COM-B model, specifically childcare responsibilities, work commitments and environmental barriers. Key facilitators were enjoyment ( motivation ), no cost ( opportunity ), instructor led ( opportunity ) and social support ( opportunity ). Conclusion: Future exercise referral schemes targeting women living in low-SEP neighbourhoods should ensure programs are designed and delivered to overcome barriers aligned with the constructs of the COM-B model, particularly opportunity -related constructors.

Suggested Citation

  • Grace McKeon & Chiara Mastrogiovanni & Megan Teychenne & Simon Rosenbaum, 2022. "Barriers and Facilitators to Participating in an Exercise Referral Scheme among Women Living in a Low Socioeconomic Area in Australia: A Qualitative Investigation Using the COM-B and Theoretical Domai," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-13, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12312-:d:927600
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12312/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/19/12312/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katherine L. Milkman & Dena Gromet & Hung Ho & Joseph S. Kay & Timothy W. Lee & Pepi Pandiloski & Yeji Park & Aneesh Rai & Max Bazerman & John Beshears & Lauri Bonacorsi & Colin Camerer & Edward Chang, 2021. "Megastudies improve the impact of applied behavioural science," Nature, Nature, vol. 600(7889), pages 478-483, December.
    2. Ragna Stalsberg & Arve Vorland Pedersen, 2018. "Are Differences in Physical Activity across Socioeconomic Groups Associated with Choice of Physical Activity Variables to Report?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-23, May.
    3. Minakshi Nayak & Karen Wills & Megan Teychenne & Jo Salmon & Verity Cleland, 2021. "Patterns and Predictors of Sitting among Women from Disad-Vantaged Neighbourhoods over Time: A 5-Year Prospective Cohort Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-13, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lucciano Testa & David Parra-Camacho & Ana María Gómez-Tafalla & Fernando Garcia-Pascual & Daniel Duclos-Bastías, 2023. "Local Impact of a Sports Centre: Effects on Future Intentions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tzu-Yu Lin & Seiichi Sakuno, 2020. "Service Quality for Sports and Active Aging in Japanese Community Sports Clubs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Anna Gaysynsky & Kathryn Heley & Wen-Ying Sylvia Chou, 2022. "An Overview of Innovative Approaches to Support Timely and Agile Health Communication Research and Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-24, November.
    3. Voelkel, Jan G. & Stagnaro, Michael & Chu, James & Pink, Sophia Lerner & Mernyk, Joseph S. & Redekopp, Chrystal & Ghezae, Isaias & Cashman, Matthew & Adjodah, Dhaval & Allen, Levi, 2023. "Megastudy identifying effective interventions to strengthen Americans’ democratic attitudes," OSF Preprints y79u5, Center for Open Science.
    4. Diane Pelly & Orla Doyle, 2022. "Nudging in the workplace: increasing participation in employee EDI wellness events," Working Papers 202208, Geary Institute, University College Dublin.
    5. Elżbieta Biernat & Monika Piątkowska, 2019. "Leisure-Time Physical Activity Participation Trends 2014–2018: A Cross-Sectional Study in Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(1), pages 1-14, December.
    6. Erev, Ido & Hiller, Maximilian & Klößner, Stefan & Lifshitz, Gal & Mertins, Vanessa & Roth, Yefim, 2022. "Promoting healthy behavior through repeated deposit contracts: An intervention study," Journal of Economic Psychology, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    7. Dagmar Sigmundová & Erik Sigmund & Petr Badura & Tomáš Hollein, 2020. "Parent-Child Physical Activity Association in Families with 4- to 16-Year-Old Children," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-12, June.
    8. Bruno Gonçalves Galdino da Costa & Jean-Philippe Chaput & Marcus Vinicius Veber Lopes & Luis Eduardo Argenta Malheiros & Kelly Samara da Silva, 2021. "Associations between Sociodemographic, Dietary, and Substance Use Factors with Self-Reported 24-Hour Movement Behaviors in a Sample of Brazilian Adolescents," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-12, March.
    9. Woerner, Andrej, 2023. "Overcoming Time Inconsistency with a Matched Bet: Theory and Evidence from Exercising," VfS Annual Conference 2023 (Regensburg): Growth and the "sociale Frage" 277711, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    10. Timmons, Shane & Robertson, Deirdre & Lunn, Pete, 2022. "Combining nudges and boosts to increase precautionary saving: A large-scale field experiment," Papers WP722, Economic and Social Research Institute (ESRI).
    11. Polman, Evan & Ruttan, Rachel L. & Peck, Joann, 2022. "Using curiosity to incentivize the choice of “should” options," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    12. Linus Dahlander, 2022. "The role of autonomy and selection at the gate in flat organizations," Journal of Organization Design, Springer;Organizational Design Community, vol. 11(1), pages 27-29, March.
    13. Hyo Lee & Damien Vitiello, 2022. "Five-Year Trend in Adherence Rate to Aerobic Physical Activity Guidelines among Korean Adults in Metropolitan Cities: 2016–2020 Korea Community Health Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-14, July.
    14. Ahmad Salman & Maha Sellami, 2019. "Do Older Adults with Multimorbidity Meet the Recommended Levels of Physical Activity? An Analysis of Scottish Health Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-10, October.
    15. Andrej Woerner, 2021. "Overcoming Time Inconsistency with a Matched Bet: Theory and Evidence from Exercising," CESifo Working Paper Series 9503, CESifo.
    16. Guillaume Coqueret, 2023. "Forking paths in financial economics," Papers 2401.08606, arXiv.org.
    17. Felix Holzmeister & Magnus Johannesson & Robert Böhm & Anna Dreber & Jürgen Huber & Michael Kirchler, 2023. "Heterogeneity in effect size estimates: Empirical evidence and practical implications," Working Papers 2023-17, Faculty of Economics and Statistics, Universität Innsbruck.
    18. Jesús García-Mayor & Élvio Rúbio Gouveia & Adilson Marques & Ernesto De la Cruz-Sánchez & Antonio Moreno-Llamas & Cíntia França & Bruna R. Gouveia & Andreas Ihle, 2022. "Exploring the Role of Physical Activity in Mediating the Association between Educational Level and Health-Related Quality of Life in an Adult Lifespan Sample from Madeira Island," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.
    19. Julia Zimmermann & Henri Tilga & Joachim Bachner & Yolanda Demetriou, 2021. "The Effect of Teacher Autonomy Support on Leisure-Time Physical Activity via Cognitive Appraisals and Achievement Emotions: A Mediation Analysis Based on the Control-Value Theory," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-18, April.
    20. Eugen Dimant & Shaul Shalvi, 2022. "Meta-Nudging Honesty: Past, Present, and Future of the Research Frontier," CESifo Working Paper Series 9939, CESifo.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:19:p:12312-:d:927600. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.