IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p9891-d885398.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Religiosity and COVID-19: Impact on Use of Remote Worship and Changes in Self-Reported Social Support

Author

Listed:
  • Maghboeba Mosavel

    (Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, 830 East Main Street, P.O. Box 980149, Richmond, VA 23298, USA)

  • Ariel Hoadley

    (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave., Ninth Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA)

  • Aderonke A. Akinkugbe

    (Division of Environmental Epidemiology, Department of Environmental Medicine and Public Health, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY 10029, USA)

  • Dina T. Garcia

    (Department of Health Behavior and Policy, Virginia Commonwealth University, 830 East Main Street, P.O. Box 980149, Richmond, VA 23298, USA)

  • Sarah Bauerle Bass

    (Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave., Ninth Floor, Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA)

Abstract

Objective : This study examines associations between changes in the use of remote worship services and changes in the types of social support among religious adults during the COVID-19 pandemic. Materials and Methods : Cross-sectional, web survey data ( n = 461; 15 May to 6 July 2020) were collected during the COVID-19 pandemic. Multinomial logistic regression models calculated unadjusted odds of increases and decreases of three types of perceived social support from before to during COVID-19 based on remote worship use. Results : Adults who initiated use of remote worship had lower odds of gaining social support for personal problems (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.19, 0.79) and greater odds of reporting less ease of getting practical help from neighbors (OR: 1.77; 95% CI: 1.04, 3.02) compared to adults who never used or stopped using remote worship. Adults who continued using remote worship services were more likely to report less ease of getting practical help from their neighbors (OR: 2.23; 95% CI: 1.17, 4.25) and decreased interest and concern felt from other people (OR: 2.62; 95% CI: 1.24, 5.51) than adults who never used or stopped using remote worship. Conclusions : Adults who initiated and continued using remote worship during the COVID-19 pandemic had poorer perceived social support outcomes relative to adults who never used or stopped using remote services. Despite continued engagement with their religious communities, adults participating in worship remotely may have had residual personal, emotional, and instrumental social support needs that remote worship did not mitigate.

Suggested Citation

  • Maghboeba Mosavel & Ariel Hoadley & Aderonke A. Akinkugbe & Dina T. Garcia & Sarah Bauerle Bass, 2022. "Religiosity and COVID-19: Impact on Use of Remote Worship and Changes in Self-Reported Social Support," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-13, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9891-:d:885398
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9891/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/9891/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lim, Chaeyoon & Putnam, Robert David, 2010. "Religion, Social Networks, and Life Satisfaction," Scholarly Articles 11105537, Harvard Kennedy School of Government.
    2. John R. Bryson & Lauren Andres & Andrew Davies, 2020. "COVID‐19, Virtual Church Services and a New Temporary Geography of Home," Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie, Royal Dutch Geographical Society KNAG, vol. 111(3), pages 360-372, July.
    3. Sherbourne, Cathy Donald & Stewart, Anita L., 1991. "The MOS social support survey," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 705-714, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Denise Catalano & Linda Holloway & Elias Mpofu, 2018. "Mental Health Interventions for Parent Carers of Children with Autistic Spectrum Disorder: Practice Guidelines from a Critical Interpretive Synthesis (CIS) Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, February.
    2. Santini, Ziggi Ivan & Jose, Paul E. & Koyanagi, Ai & Meilstrup, Charlotte & Nielsen, Line & Madsen, Katrine R. & Koushede, Vibeke, 2020. "Formal social participation protects physical health through enhanced mental health: A longitudinal mediation analysis using three consecutive waves of the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in E," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    3. Liping Ye & Xinping Zhang, 2021. "The association mechanism between social network types and health‐related behaviours among the elderly in rural Hubei Province, China," International Journal of Health Planning and Management, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 36(3), pages 826-846, May.
    4. Patrick Nürnberger & Dirk von Lewinski & Hans-Bernd Rothenhäusler & Celine Braun & Patrick Reinbacher & Ewald Kolesnik & Andreas Baranyi, 2022. "A biopsychosocial model of severe fear of COVID-19," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(2), pages 1-16, February.
    5. Byoung-Jin Jeon & Kang-Hyun Park, 2022. "The Impact of Social Network Characteristics on Health among Community-Dwelling Older Adults in Korea: Application of Social Network Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(7), pages 1-9, March.
    6. Jun Zhang & Yuang He & Jing Zhang, 2022. "Energy Poverty and Depression in Rural China: Evidence from the Quantile Regression Approach," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(2), pages 1-21, January.
    7. Kenneth G. Rice & Fernán Arana & Hannah Wetstone & Michelle Aiello & Barbara Durán, 2023. "Predicting and Moderating COVID-Fear and Stress among College Students in Argentina and the USA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(15), pages 1-20, August.
    8. Feng Zhang & Haina Zhang & Geoffrey G. Bell, 2021. "Corporate religiosity and individual decision on conducting entrepreneurial activity: The contingent effects of institutional environments in China," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 955-978, September.
    9. Ellen G. Levine & Grace J. Yoo & Caryn Aviv, 2017. "Predictors of Quality of Life among Ethnically Diverse Breast Cancer Survivors," Applied Research in Quality of Life, Springer;International Society for Quality-of-Life Studies, vol. 12(1), pages 1-16, March.
    10. Nikolova, Milena, 2016. "Minding the happiness gap: Political institutions and perceived quality of life in transition," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 45(S), pages 129-148.
    11. Petro Mlyakado, Budeba & Li, Jessica Chi-Mei & Xinshan Jia, Cindy, 2023. "Online sexual exploitation of adolescents in Tanzania: Explaining help-seeking intention using the theory of planned behaviour," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    12. Kathleen Finlayson & Helen Edwards & Mary Courtney, 2010. "The impact of psychosocial factors on adherence to compression therapy to prevent recurrence of venous leg ulcers," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 19(9‐10), pages 1289-1297, May.
    13. Opfinger, Matthias & Gundlach, Erich, 2011. "Religiosity as a determinant of happiness," Open Access Publications from Kiel Institute for the World Economy 48360, Kiel Institute for the World Economy (IfW Kiel).
    14. Jieun Yoo, 2020. "Gratitude and Subjective Well-Being among Koreans," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-10, November.
    15. Lisa Hightow-Weidman & Sara LeGrand & Seul Ki Choi & Joseph Egger & Christopher B Hurt & Kathryn E Muessig, 2017. "Exploring the HIV continuum of care among young black MSM," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(6), pages 1-20, June.
    16. Charlay Indoumou Peppe & Emin Altintas & Eleonore Ngoma Voumbi & Alain Guerrien, 2018. "Personality, Relationships with Others and Psychological Well-Being: A Pilot Study on the Gabonese Older People," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(7), pages 1965-1979, October.
    17. Zoua M. Vang & Feng Hou & Katharine Elder, 2019. "Perceived Religious Discrimination, Religiosity, and Life Satisfaction," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 20(6), pages 1913-1932, August.
    18. Trinh Q. Long, 2021. "Individual Subjective Well-Being during the COVID-19 Pandemic," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    19. Hongmei Tong & Yu Lung & Shen (Lamson) Lin & Karen M Kobayashi & Karen M Davison & Senyo Agbeyaka & Esme Fuller-Thomson, 2021. "Refugee status is associated with double the odds of psychological distress in mid-to-late life: Findings from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 67(6), pages 747-760, September.
    20. Yanjie Bian & Mingsong Hao & Yaojun Li, 2018. "Social Networks and Subjective Well-Being: A Comparison of Australia, Britain, and China," Journal of Happiness Studies, Springer, vol. 19(8), pages 2489-2508, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:9891-:d:885398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.