IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2022i16p10107-d889164.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Compositional Data Analysis of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Results from Hospital Airborne Microbiome Samples

Author

Listed:
  • Maria Rita Perrone

    (Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Salvatore Romano

    (Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Giuseppe De Maria

    (Presidio Ospedaliero Santa Caterina Novella, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Lecce, 73013 Galatina, Italy)

  • Paolo Tundo

    (Presidio Ospedaliero Santa Caterina Novella, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Lecce, 73013 Galatina, Italy)

  • Anna Rita Bruno

    (Presidio Ospedaliero Santa Caterina Novella, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Lecce, 73013 Galatina, Italy)

  • Luigi Tagliaferro

    (Presidio Ospedaliero Santa Caterina Novella, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Lecce, 73013 Galatina, Italy)

  • Michele Maffia

    (Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences and Technologies, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

  • Mattia Fragola

    (Department of Mathematics and Physics, University of Salento, 73100 Lecce, Italy)

Abstract

The compositional analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequencing datasets is applied to characterize the bacterial structure of airborne samples collected in different locations of a hospital infection disease department hosting COVID-19 patients, as well as to investigate the relationships among bacterial taxa at the genus and species level. The exploration of the centered log-ratio transformed data by the principal component analysis via the singular value decomposition has shown that the collected samples segregated with an observable separation depending on the monitoring location. More specifically, two main sample clusters were identified with regards to bacterial genera (species), consisting of samples mostly collected in rooms with and without COVID-19 patients, respectively. Human pathogenic genera (species) associated with nosocomial infections were mostly found in samples from areas hosting patients, while non-pathogenic genera (species) mainly isolated from soil were detected in the other samples. Propionibacterium acnes , Staphylococcus pettenkoferi , Corynebacterium tuberculostearicum , and jeikeium were the main pathogenic species detected in COVID-19 patients’ rooms. Samples from these locations were on average characterized by smaller richness/evenness and diversity than the other ones, both at the genus and species level. Finally, the ρ metrics revealed that pairwise positive associations occurred either between pathogenic or non-pathogenic taxa.

Suggested Citation

  • Maria Rita Perrone & Salvatore Romano & Giuseppe De Maria & Paolo Tundo & Anna Rita Bruno & Luigi Tagliaferro & Michele Maffia & Mattia Fragola, 2022. "Compositional Data Analysis of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Results from Hospital Airborne Microbiome Samples," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-21, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10107-:d:889164
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10107/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/16/10107/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jacob T. Nearing & Gavin M. Douglas & Molly G. Hayes & Jocelyn MacDonald & Dhwani K. Desai & Nicole Allward & Casey M. A. Jones & Robyn J. Wright & Akhilesh S. Dhanani & André M. Comeau & Morgan G. I., 2022. "Microbiome differential abundance methods produce different results across 38 datasets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    2. Jacob T. Nearing & Gavin M. Douglas & Molly G. Hayes & Jocelyn MacDonald & Dhwani K. Desai & Nicole Allward & Casey M. A. Jones & Robyn J. Wright & Akhilesh S. Dhanani & André M. Comeau & Morgan G. I., 2022. "Author Correction: Microbiome differential abundance methods produce different results across 38 datasets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-1, December.
    3. Zachary D Kurtz & Christian L Müller & Emily R Miraldi & Dan R Littman & Martin J Blaser & Richard A Bonneau, 2015. "Sparse and Compositionally Robust Inference of Microbial Ecological Networks," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-25, May.
    4. David Lovell & Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn & Juan José Egozcue & Samuel Marguerat & Jürg Bähler, 2015. "Proportionality: A Valid Alternative to Correlation for Relative Data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Braden T Tierney & Yingxuan Tan & Zhen Yang & Bing Shui & Michaela J Walker & Benjamin M Kent & Aleksandar D Kostic & Chirag J Patel, 2022. "Systematically assessing microbiome–disease associations identifies drivers of inconsistency in metagenomic research," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, March.
    2. Karen D. Corbin & Elvis A. Carnero & Blake Dirks & Daria Igudesman & Fanchao Yi & Andrew Marcus & Taylor L. Davis & Richard E. Pratley & Bruce E. Rittmann & Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown & Steven R. Smith, 2023. "Host-diet-gut microbiome interactions influence human energy balance: a randomized clinical trial," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    3. Huang Lin & Merete Eggesbø & Shyamal Das Peddada, 2022. "Linear and nonlinear correlation estimators unveil undescribed taxa interactions in microbiome data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Zachary D. Wallen & Ayse Demirkan & Guy Twa & Gwendolyn Cohen & Marissa N. Dean & David G. Standaert & Timothy R. Sampson & Haydeh Payami, 2022. "Metagenomics of Parkinson’s disease implicates the gut microbiome in multiple disease mechanisms," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    5. Juan José Egozcue & Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn, 2019. "Compositional data: the sample space and its structure," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 599-638, September.
    6. Kai Markus Schneider & Antje Mohs & Wenfang Gui & Eric J. C. Galvez & Lena Susanna Candels & Lisa Hoenicke & Uthayakumar Muthukumarasamy & Christian H. Holland & Carsten Elfers & Konrad Kilic & Caroli, 2022. "Imbalanced gut microbiota fuels hepatocellular carcinoma development by shaping the hepatic inflammatory microenvironment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Duo Jiang & Thomas Sharpton & Yuan Jiang, 2021. "Microbial Interaction Network Estimation via Bias-Corrected Graphical Lasso," Statistics in Biosciences, Springer;International Chinese Statistical Association, vol. 13(2), pages 329-350, July.
    8. Colignatus, Thomas, 2017. "Comparing votes and seats with a diagonal (dis-) proportionality measure, using the slope-diagonal deviation (SDD) with cosine, sine and sign," MPRA Paper 80833, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 17 Aug 2017.
    9. Jiarui Lu & Pixu Shi & Hongzhe Li, 2019. "Generalized linear models with linear constraints for microbiome compositional data," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 75(1), pages 235-244, March.
    10. Dina in ‘t Zandt & Zuzana Kolaříková & Tomáš Cajthaml & Zuzana Münzbergová, 2023. "Plant community stability is associated with a decoupling of prokaryote and fungal soil networks," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-14, December.
    11. Li, Lianwei & Li, Wendy & Zou, Quan & Ma, Zhanshan (Sam), 2020. "Network analysis of the hot spring microbiome sketches out possible niche differentiations among ecological guilds," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 431(C).
    12. Qin Liu & Qi Su & Fen Zhang & Hein M. Tun & Joyce Wing Yan Mak & Grace Chung-Yan Lui & Susanna So Shan Ng & Jessica Y. L. Ching & Amy Li & Wenqi Lu & Chenyu Liu & Chun Pan Cheung & David S. C. Hui & P, 2022. "Multi-kingdom gut microbiota analyses define COVID-19 severity and post-acute COVID-19 syndrome," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    13. Colignatus, Thomas, 2017. "Comparing votes and seats with a diagonal (dis-) proportionality measure, using the slope-diagonal deviation (SDD) with cosine, sine and sign," MPRA Paper 80965, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Aug 2017.
    14. Pratheepa Jeganathan & Susan P. Holmes, 2021. "A Statistical Perspective on the Challenges in Molecular Microbial Biology," Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, Springer;The International Biometric Society;American Statistical Association, vol. 26(2), pages 131-160, June.
    15. Ana Popovic & Celine Bourdon & Pauline W. Wang & David S. Guttman & Sajid Soofi & Zulfiqar A. Bhutta & Robert H. J. Bandsma & John Parkinson & Lisa G. Pell, 2021. "Micronutrient supplements can promote disruptive protozoan and fungal communities in the developing infant gut," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-13, December.
    16. Rieser, Christopher & Filzmoser, Peter, 2023. "Extending compositional data analysis from a graph signal processing perspective," Journal of Multivariate Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    17. Runtan Cheng & Lu Wang & Shenglong Le & Yifan Yang & Can Zhao & Xiangqi Zhang & Xin Yang & Ting Xu & Leiting Xu & Petri Wiklund & Jun Ge & Dajiang Lu & Chenhong Zhang & Luonan Chen & Sulin Cheng, 2022. "A randomized controlled trial for response of microbiome network to exercise and diet intervention in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-13, December.
    18. Yu Shang & Johannes Sikorski & Michael Bonkowski & Anna-Maria Fiore-Donno & Ellen Kandeler & Sven Marhan & Runa S Boeddinghaus & Emily F Solly & Marion Schrumpf & Ingo Schöning & Tesfaye Wubet & Franc, 2017. "Inferring interactions in complex microbial communities from nucleotide sequence data and environmental parameters," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(3), pages 1-24, March.
    19. Oliver Aasmets & Kertu Liis Krigul & Kreete Lüll & Andres Metspalu & Elin Org, 2022. "Gut metagenome associations with extensive digital health data in a volunteer-based Estonian microbiome cohort," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    20. Emma Schwager & Himel Mallick & Steffen Ventz & Curtis Huttenhower, 2017. "A Bayesian method for detecting pairwise associations in compositional data," PLOS Computational Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-21, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2022:i:16:p:10107-:d:889164. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.