IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/plo/pone00/0292055.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Simple and flexible sign and rank-based methods for testing for differential abundance in microbiome studies

Author

Listed:
  • Leyla Kodalci
  • Olivier Thas

Abstract

Microbiome data obtained with amplicon sequencing are considered as compositional data. It has been argued that these data can be analysed after appropriate transformation to log-ratios, but ratios and logarithms cause problems with the many zeroes in typical microbiome experiments. We demonstrate that some well chosen sign and rank transformations also allow for valid inference with compositional data, and we show how logistic regression and probabilistic index models can be used for testing for differential abundance, while inheriting the flexibility of a statistical modelling framework. The results of a simulation study demonstrate that the new methods perform better than most other methods, and that it is comparable with ANCOM-BC. These methods are implemented in an R-package ‘signtrans’ and can be installed from Github (https://github.com/lucp9827/signtrans).

Suggested Citation

  • Leyla Kodalci & Olivier Thas, 2023. "Simple and flexible sign and rank-based methods for testing for differential abundance in microbiome studies," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(9), pages 1-17, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292055
    DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0292055
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292055
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0292055&type=printable
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1371/journal.pone.0292055?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Min Zhang & Anastasios A. Tsiatis & Marie Davidian, 2008. "Improving Efficiency of Inferences in Randomized Clinical Trials Using Auxiliary Covariates," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 64(3), pages 707-715, September.
    2. Juan José Egozcue & Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn, 2019. "Compositional data: the sample space and its structure," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 599-638, September.
    3. Jacob T. Nearing & Gavin M. Douglas & Molly G. Hayes & Jocelyn MacDonald & Dhwani K. Desai & Nicole Allward & Casey M. A. Jones & Robyn J. Wright & Akhilesh S. Dhanani & André M. Comeau & Morgan G. I., 2022. "Microbiome differential abundance methods produce different results across 38 datasets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    4. Huang Lin & Shyamal Das Peddada, 2020. "Analysis of compositions of microbiomes with bias correction," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    5. Jacob T. Nearing & Gavin M. Douglas & Molly G. Hayes & Jocelyn MacDonald & Dhwani K. Desai & Nicole Allward & Casey M. A. Jones & Robyn J. Wright & Akhilesh S. Dhanani & André M. Comeau & Morgan G. I., 2022. "Author Correction: Microbiome differential abundance methods produce different results across 38 datasets," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-1, December.
    6. Juan José Egozcue & Vera Pawlowsky-Glahn, 2019. "Rejoinder on: Compositional data: the sample space and its structure," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 28(3), pages 658-663, September.
    7. Selene Leon & Anastasios A. Tsiatis & Marie Davidian, 2003. "Semiparametric Estimation of Treatment Effect in a Pretest-Posttest Study," Biometrics, The International Biometric Society, vol. 59(4), pages 1046-1055, December.
    8. James T. Morton & Clarisse Marotz & Alex Washburne & Justin Silverman & Livia S. Zaramela & Anna Edlund & Karsten Zengler & Rob Knight, 2019. "Establishing microbial composition measurement standards with reference frames," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 10(1), pages 1-11, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karen D. Corbin & Elvis A. Carnero & Blake Dirks & Daria Igudesman & Fanchao Yi & Andrew Marcus & Taylor L. Davis & Richard E. Pratley & Bruce E. Rittmann & Rosa Krajmalnik-Brown & Steven R. Smith, 2023. "Host-diet-gut microbiome interactions influence human energy balance: a randomized clinical trial," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 14(1), pages 1-17, December.
    2. Zachary D. Wallen & Ayse Demirkan & Guy Twa & Gwendolyn Cohen & Marissa N. Dean & David G. Standaert & Timothy R. Sampson & Haydeh Payami, 2022. "Metagenomics of Parkinson’s disease implicates the gut microbiome in multiple disease mechanisms," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-20, December.
    3. Jose Agudelo & Xing Chen & Sromona D. Mukherjee & Jane K. Nguyen & Leslie A. Bruggeman & Aaron W. Miller, 2024. "Cefazolin shifts the kidney microbiota to promote a lithogenic environment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-19, December.
    4. Anna Maria Fiori & Francesco Porro, 2023. "A compositional analysis of systemic risk in European financial institutions," Annals of Finance, Springer, vol. 19(3), pages 325-354, September.
    5. Germ`a Coenders & N'uria Arimany Serrat, 2023. "Accounting statement analysis at industry level. A gentle introduction to the compositional approach," Papers 2305.16842, arXiv.org, revised Jun 2025.
    6. Braden T Tierney & Yingxuan Tan & Zhen Yang & Bing Shui & Michaela J Walker & Benjamin M Kent & Aleksandar D Kostic & Chirag J Patel, 2022. "Systematically assessing microbiome–disease associations identifies drivers of inconsistency in metagenomic research," PLOS Biology, Public Library of Science, vol. 20(3), pages 1-18, March.
    7. Spencer R. Rosario & Mark D. Long & Shanmuga Chilakapati & Eduardo Cortes Gomez & Sebastiano Battaglia & Prashant K. Singh & Jianmin Wang & Katy Wang & Kristopher Attwood & Suzanne M. Hess & AJ Robert, 2024. "Integrative multi-omics analysis uncovers tumor-immune-gut axis influencing immunotherapy outcomes in ovarian cancer," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Joscha Krause & Jan Pablo Burgard & Domingo Morales, 2022. "Robust prediction of domain compositions from uncertain data using isometric logratio transformations in a penalized multivariate Fay–Herriot model," Statistica Neerlandica, Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research, vol. 76(1), pages 65-96, February.
    9. Janice L. Scealy, 2021. "Comments on: Recent advances in directional statistics," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 30(1), pages 68-70, March.
    10. Salvador Linares-Mustar'os & Maria `Angels Farreras-Noguer & N'uria Arimany-Serrat & Germ`a Coenders, 2022. "New financial ratios based on the compositional data methodology," Papers 2210.11138, arXiv.org, revised May 2025.
    11. Alexander R. Bennett & Jon Lundstrøm & Sayantani Chatterjee & Morten Thaysen-Andersen & Daniel Bojar, 2025. "Compositional data analysis enables statistical rigor in comparative glycomics," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 16(1), pages 1-15, December.
    12. Alvis Cabrera & Lyvia Biagi & Aleix Beneyto & Ernesto Estremera & Iván Contreras & Marga Giménez & Ignacio Conget & Jorge Bondia & Josep Antoni Martín-Fernández & Josep Vehí, 2023. "Validation of a Probabilistic Prediction Model for Patients with Type 1 Diabetes Using Compositional Data Analysis," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-17, March.
    13. Rosenblum Michael & van der Laan Mark J., 2010. "Simple, Efficient Estimators of Treatment Effects in Randomized Trials Using Generalized Linear Models to Leverage Baseline Variables," The International Journal of Biostatistics, De Gruyter, vol. 6(1), pages 1-44, April.
    14. Huang Lin & Merete Eggesbø & Shyamal Das Peddada, 2022. "Linear and nonlinear correlation estimators unveil undescribed taxa interactions in microbiome data," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-16, December.
    15. Shulei Wang, 2023. "Robust differential abundance test in compositional data," Biometrika, Biometrika Trust, vol. 110(1), pages 169-185.
    16. Núria Arimany-Serrat & Andrey Felipe Sgorla, 2024. "Financial and ESG Analysis of the Beer Sector Pre- and Post-COVID-19 in Italy and Spain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-17, August.
    17. Maria Rita Perrone & Salvatore Romano & Giuseppe De Maria & Paolo Tundo & Anna Rita Bruno & Luigi Tagliaferro & Michele Maffia & Mattia Fragola, 2022. "Compositional Data Analysis of 16S rRNA Gene Sequencing Results from Hospital Airborne Microbiome Samples," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(16), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Pol Jofre-Campuzano & Germà Coenders, 2022. "Compositional Classification of Financial Statement Profiles: The Weighted Case," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 15(12), pages 1-17, November.
    19. Kai Markus Schneider & Antje Mohs & Wenfang Gui & Eric J. C. Galvez & Lena Susanna Candels & Lisa Hoenicke & Uthayakumar Muthukumarasamy & Christian H. Holland & Carsten Elfers & Konrad Kilic & Caroli, 2022. "Imbalanced gut microbiota fuels hepatocellular carcinoma development by shaping the hepatic inflammatory microenvironment," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-19, December.
    20. María Dolores Esteban & María José Lombardía & Esther López-Vizcaíno & Domingo Morales & Agustín Pérez, 2023. "Small area estimation of average compositions under multivariate nested error regression models," TEST: An Official Journal of the Spanish Society of Statistics and Operations Research, Springer;Sociedad de Estadística e Investigación Operativa, vol. 32(2), pages 651-676, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:plo:pone00:0292055. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: plosone (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://journals.plos.org/plosone/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.