IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v19y2021i1p400-d714910.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Temporal and Spatial Variation of Aboveground Biomass of Pinus densata and Its Drivers in Shangri-La, CHINA

Author

Listed:
  • Dongfan Xu

    (Faculty of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Jialong Zhang

    (Faculty of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Rui Bao

    (Faculty of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Yi Liao

    (Faculty of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Dongyang Han

    (Faculty of Forestry, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China)

  • Qianwei Liu

    (Faculty of Geography, Yunnan Normal University, Kunming 650092, China)

  • Tao Cheng

    (National Geomatics Center of China, Beijing 100089, China)

Abstract

Understanding the drivers of forest aboveground biomass (AGB) is essential to further understanding the forest carbon cycle. In the upper Yangtze River region, where ecosystems are incredibly fragile, the driving factors that make AGB changes differ from other regions. This study aims to investigate AGB’s spatial and temporal variation of Pinus densata in Shangri-La and decompose the direct and indirect effects of spatial attribute, climate, stand structure, and agricultural activity on AGB in Shangri-La to evaluate the degree of influence of each factor on AGB change. The continuous sample plots from National Forest Inventory (NFI) and Landsat time series were used to estimate the AGB in 1987, 1992, 1997, 2002, 2007, 2012, and 2017. The structural equation model (SEM) was used to analyze the different effects of the four factors on AGB based on five scales: entire, 1987–2002, 2007–2017, low population density, and high population density. The results are as follows: (1) The AGB of Pinus densata in Shangri-La decreased from 1987 to 2017, with the total amount falling from 9.52 million tons to 7.41 million tons, and the average AGB falling from 55.49 t/ha to 40.10 t/ha. (2) At different scales, stand structure and climate were the drivers that directly affect the AGB change. In contrast, the agricultural activity had a negative direct effect on the AGB change, and spatial attribute had a relatively small indirect effect on the AGB change. (3) Analyzing the SEM results at different scales, the change of the contribution of the agricultural activity indicates that human activity is the main negative driver of AGB change in Shangri-La, especially at the high population density region. In contrast, the change of the contribution of the stand structure and climate indicates that the loss of old trees has an important influence on the AGB change. Forest resources here and other ecologically fragile areas should be gradually restored by adhering to policies, such as strengthening forest protection, improving forest stand quality, and limiting agricultural production activities.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongfan Xu & Jialong Zhang & Rui Bao & Yi Liao & Dongyang Han & Qianwei Liu & Tao Cheng, 2021. "Temporal and Spatial Variation of Aboveground Biomass of Pinus densata and Its Drivers in Shangri-La, CHINA," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(1), pages 1-17, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:400-:d:714910
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/400/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/19/1/400/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Rupert Seidl & Dominik Thom & Markus Kautz & Dario Martin-Benito & Mikko Peltoniemi & Giorgio Vacchiano & Jan Wild & Davide Ascoli & Michal Petr & Juha Honkaniemi & Manfred J. Lexer & Volodymyr Trotsi, 2017. "Forest disturbances under climate change," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 7(6), pages 395-402, June.
    2. Karl-Heinz Erb & Thomas Kastner & Sebastiaan Luyssaert & Richard A. Houghton & Tobias Kuemmerle & Pontus Olofsson & Helmut Haberl, 2013. "Bias in the attribution of forest carbon sinks," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 3(10), pages 854-856, October.
    3. Maite Gartzia & Federico Fillat & Fernando Pérez-Cabello & Concepción L Alados, 2016. "Influence of Agropastoral System Components on Mountain Grassland Vulnerability Estimated by Connectivity Loss," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(5), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Panpan Chen & Huamin Liu & Zongming Wang & Dehua Mao & Cunzhu Liang & Lu Wen & Zhiyong Li & Jinghui Zhang & Dongwei Liu & Yi Zhuo & Lixin Wang, 2021. "Vegetation Dynamic Assessment by NDVI and Field Observations for Sustainability of China’s Wulagai River Basin," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(5), pages 1-20, March.
    5. Ahmed Ibrahim Ahmed & Lulu Hou & Ruirui Yan & Xiaoping Xin & Yousif Mohamed Zainelabdeen, 2020. "The Joint Effect of Grazing Intensity and Soil Factors on Aboveground Net Primary Production in Hulunber Grasslands Meadow Steppe," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-19, July.
    6. Nancy L. Harris & David A. Gibbs & Alessandro Baccini & Richard A. Birdsey & Sytze Bruin & Mary Farina & Lola Fatoyinbo & Matthew C. Hansen & Martin Herold & Richard A. Houghton & Peter V. Potapov & D, 2021. "Global maps of twenty-first century forest carbon fluxes," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 11(3), pages 234-240, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Julia Noë & Karl-Heinz Erb & Sarah Matej & Andreas Magerl & Manan Bhan & Simone Gingrich, 2021. "Altered growth conditions more than reforestation counteracted forest biomass carbon emissions 1990–2020," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-10, December.
    2. Jessica Stubenrauch & Beatrice Garske & Felix Ekardt & Katharina Hagemann, 2022. "European Forest Governance: Status Quo and Optimising Options with Regard to the Paris Climate Target," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(7), pages 1-35, April.
    3. Hallberg-Sramek, Isabella & Nordström, Eva-Maria & Priebe, Janina & Reimerson, Elsa & Mårald, Erland & Nordin, Annika, 2023. "Combining scientific and local knowledge improves evaluating future scenarios of forest ecosystem services," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 60(C).
    4. Carlos Sanz-Lazaro, 2019. "A Framework to Advance the Understanding of the Ecological Effects of Extreme Climate Events," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(21), pages 1-18, October.
    5. Rafael González-Val, 2021. "The Probability Distribution of Worldwide Forest Areas," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    6. Bergkvist, John & Lagergren, Fredrik & Linderson, Maj-Lena Finnander & Miller, Paul & Lindeskog, Mats & Jönsson, Anna Maria, 2023. "Modelling managed forest ecosystems in Sweden: An evaluation from the stand to the regional scale," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).
    7. Petri P. Kärenlampi, 2021. "Capital Return Rate and Carbon Storage on Forest Estates of Three Boreal Tree Species," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-19, June.
    8. Tiehu He & Weixin Ding & Xiaoli Cheng & Yanjiang Cai & Yulong Zhang & Huijuan Xia & Xia Wang & Jiehao Zhang & Kerong Zhang & Quanfa Zhang, 2024. "Meta-analysis shows the impacts of ecological restoration on greenhouse gas emissions," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-14, December.
    9. Li Yu & Fengxue Gu & Mei Huang & Bo Tao & Man Hao & Zhaosheng Wang, 2020. "Impacts of 1.5 °C and 2 °C Global Warming on Net Primary Productivity and Carbon Balance in China’s Terrestrial Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-17, April.
    10. William M. Hammond & A. Park Williams & John T. Abatzoglou & Henry D. Adams & Tamir Klein & Rosana López & Cuauhtémoc Sáenz-Romero & Henrik Hartmann & David D. Breshears & Craig D. Allen, 2022. "Global field observations of tree die-off reveal hotter-drought fingerprint for Earth’s forests," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-11, December.
    11. Gao, Ming, 2023. "The impacts of carbon trading policy on China's low-carbon economy based on county-level perspectives," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).
    12. Fugeray-Scarbel, Aline & Irz, Xavier & Lemarié, Stéphane, 2023. "Innovation in forest tree genetics: A comparative economic analysis in the European context," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    13. Winkel, Georg & Lovrić, Marko & Muys, Bart & Katila, Pia & Lundhede, Thomas & Pecurul, Mireia & Pettenella, Davide & Pipart, Nathalie & Plieninger, Tobias & Prokofieva, Irina & Parra, Constanza & Pülz, 2022. "Governing Europe's forests for multiple ecosystem services: Opportunities, challenges, and policy options," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(C).
    14. Brèteau-Amores, Sandrine & Yousefpour, Rasoul & Hanewinkel, Marc & Fortin, Mathieu, 2023. "Forest adaptation strategies to reconcile timber production and carbon sequestration objectives under multiple risks of extreme drought and windstorm events," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    15. Haga, Chihiro & Hotta, Wataru & Inoue, Takahiro & Matsui, Takanori & Aiba, Masahiro & Owari, Toshiaki & Suzuki, Satoshi N. & Shibata, Hideaki & Morimoto, Junko, 2022. "Modeling Tree Recovery in Wind-Disturbed Forests with Dense Understory Species under Climate Change," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 472(C).
    16. Fitts, Lucia A. & Fraser, Jacob S. & Miranda, Brian R. & Domke, Grant M. & Russell, Matthew B. & Sturtevant, Brian R., 2023. "An iterative site-scale approach to calibrate and corroborate successional processes within a forest landscape model," Ecological Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 477(C).
    17. Kolo, Horst & Kindu, Mengistie & Knoke, Thomas, 2020. "Optimizing forest management for timber production, carbon sequestration and groundwater recharge," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    18. Blattert, Clemens & Lemm, Renato & Thürig, Esther & Stadelmann, Golo & Brändli, Urs-Beat & Temperli, Christian, 2020. "Long-term impacts of increased timber harvests on ecosystem services and biodiversity: A scenario study based on national forest inventory data," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 45(C).
    19. Zefeng Chen & Weiguang Wang & Giovanni Forzieri & Alessandro Cescatti, 2024. "Transition from positive to negative indirect CO2 effects on the vegetation carbon uptake," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    20. Samuel G. Woodman & Sacha Khoury & Ronald E. Fournier & Erik J. S. Emilson & John M. Gunn & James A. Rusak & Andrew J. Tanentzap, 2021. "Forest defoliator outbreaks alter nutrient cycling in northern waters," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 12(1), pages 1-8, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:19:y:2021:i:1:p:400-:d:714910. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.