IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i3p1246-d490012.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of an Observational Measure for Parent–Child Responsive Caregiving

Author

Listed:
  • Alessandra Schneider

    (Department of Applied Psychology and Human Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S, Canada)

  • Michelle Rodrigues

    (Department of Applied Psychology and Human Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S, Canada)

  • Olesya Falenchuk

    (Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S, Canada)

  • Tiago N. Munhoz

    (Faculty of Psychology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas 96010900, Brazil
    Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas 96010900, Brazil)

  • Aluisio J. D. Barros

    (Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas 96010900, Brazil)

  • Joseph Murray

    (Postgraduate Program in Epidemiology, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas 96010900, Brazil
    Human Development and Violence Research Centre, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas 96010900, Brazil)

  • Marlos R. Domingues

    (Postgraduate Program in Physical Education, Federal University of Pelotas, Pelotas 96010900, Brazil)

  • Jennifer M. Jenkins

    (Department of Applied Psychology and Human Development, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S, Canada)

Abstract

Responsive caregiving is the dimension of parenting most consistently related to later child functioning in both developing and developed countries. There is a growing need for efficient, psychometrically sound and culturally appropriate measurement of this construct. This study describes the cross-cultural validation in Brazil of the Responsive Interactions for Learning (RIFL-P) measure, requiring only eight minutes for assessment and coding. The cross-cultural adaptation used a recognized seven-step procedure. The adapted version was applied to a stratified sample of 153 Brazilian mother–child (18 months) dyads. Videos of mother–child interaction were coded using the RIFL-P and a longer gold standard parenting assessment. Mothers completed a survey on child stimulation (18 months) and child outcomes were measured at 24 months. Internal consistency (α = 0.94), inter-rater reliability ( r = 0.83), and intra-rater reliability ( r = 0.94) were all satisfactory to high. RIFL-P scores were significantly correlated with another measurement of parenting ( r ’s ranged from 0.32 to 0.47, p < 0.001), stimulation markers ( r = 0.34, p < 0.01), and children’s cognition ( r = 0.29, p < 0.001), language ( r = 0.28, p < 0.001), and positive behavior ( r = 0.17, p < 0.05). The Brazilian Portuguese version is a valid and reliable instrument for a brief assessment of responsive caregiving.

Suggested Citation

  • Alessandra Schneider & Michelle Rodrigues & Olesya Falenchuk & Tiago N. Munhoz & Aluisio J. D. Barros & Joseph Murray & Marlos R. Domingues & Jennifer M. Jenkins, 2021. "Cross-Cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Brazilian Portuguese Version of an Observational Measure for Parent–Child Responsive Caregiving," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-15, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1246-:d:490012
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1246/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/3/1246/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Martins, Rafaela Costa & Machado, Adriana Kramer Fiala & Shenderovich, Yulia & Soares, Tâmara Biolo & da Cruz, Suélen Henriques & Altafim, Elisa Raquel Pisani & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins & Barro, 2020. "Parental attendance in two early-childhood training programmes to improve nurturing care: A randomized controlled trial," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    2. Joyce J Endendijk & Marleen G Groeneveld & Marian J Bakermans-Kranenburg & Judi Mesman, 2016. "Gender-Differentiated Parenting Revisited: Meta-Analysis Reveals Very Few Differences in Parental Control of Boys and Girls," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 11(7), pages 1-33, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Verónica Schiariti, 2021. "Introduction to the Special Issue on Early Child Development: From Measurement to Optimal Functioning and Evidence-Based Policy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-4, May.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Livvy Mitchell & Isabelle Sin & Maanaima Soa-Lafoai & Colleen Ward, 2022. "Gendered parenting and the intergenerational transmission of gendered stereotypes: Evidence from the Growing Up in New Zealand survey," Working Papers 22_10, Motu Economic and Public Policy Research.
    2. Francis, Taja & Baker-Henningham, Helen, 2021. "The Irie Homes Toolbox: A cluster randomized controlled trial of an early childhood parenting program to prevent violence against children in Jamaica," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    3. Lotto, Camila Regina & Altafim, Elisa Rachel Pisani & Linhares, Maria Beatriz Martins, 2022. "Feasibility and acceptability study of the online ACT-Raising Safe Kids program," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 141(C).
    4. Choe, Danbi, 2020. "Parents’ and adolescents’ perceptions of parental support as predictors of adolescents’ academic achievement and self-regulated learning," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    5. Chan, Yau Yu & Li, Jian-Bin, 2020. "An early look at parental expectation towards early childhood education among Pakistani parents in Hong Kong: The role of culture and acculturation," Children and Youth Services Review, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    6. Tine Steenhoff & Anne Tharner & Mette Skovgaard Væver, 2019. "Mothers' and fathers' observed interaction with preschoolers: Similarities and differences in parenting behavior in a well-resourced sample," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 14(8), pages 1-25, August.
    7. Dr. Mussarat Jabeen Khan & Kainat Zia & Dr. Sumaira Naz & Ayesha Jahangir & Awwabah Rufarakh, 2023. "Relationship between Parenting Styles and Socio-Emotional and Character Development among School Students," Journal of Policy Research (JPR), Research Foundation for Humanity (RFH), vol. 9(3), pages 141-147.
    8. Stuti S. Kokkalera & Chris E. Marshall & Ineke Haen Marshall, 2018. "The Role of Parental Maltreatment and Parental Social Control on Self-Reported Violent Offending in Indonesia and the U.S.: Does Gender Make a Difference?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 8(2), pages 1-25, May.
    9. Conzo, Pierluigi & Zotti, Roberto, 2020. "Blessed are the first: The long-term effect of birth order on trust," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    10. Wolfgang Briegel & Jan Greuel & Sanna Stroth & Nina Heinrichs, 2019. "Parents’ Perception of Their 2–10-Year-Old Children’s Contribution to The Dyadic Parent-Child Relationship in Terms of Positive and Negative Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-26, March.
    11. Pesando, Luca Maria & De Cao, Elisabetta & La Mattina, Giulia & Ciancio, Alberto, 2023. "Educational Assortative Mating and Harsh Parenting in Sub-Saharan Africa," IZA Discussion Papers 16466, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    12. Elias P. Kourkoutas & Stefanos G. Giakoumatos, 2023. "Statistical analysis and evaluation of Greek students’ background determinants on Science literacy," Journal of Statistical and Econometric Methods, SCIENPRESS Ltd, vol. 12(2), pages 1-2.
    13. David Montero-Montero & Paula López-Martínez & Belén Martínez-Ferrer & David Moreno-Ruiz, 2020. "Parenting Dimensions and Adolescent Peer Aggression: A Gendered Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-15, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:3:p:1246-:d:490012. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.