IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i20p10566-d652360.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Analysis of Policies to Protect the Health of Urban Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Thailand: A Qualitative Study and Delphi Survey

Author

Listed:
  • Sataporn Julchoo

    (International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Mathudara Phaiyarom

    (International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Pigunkaew Sinam

    (International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Watinee Kunpeuk

    (International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

  • Nareerut Pudpong

    (International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
    Sirindron College of Public Health, Chonburi 20000, Thailand)

  • Rapeepong Suphanchaimat

    (International Health Policy Program, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand
    Department of Disease Control, Division of Epidemiology, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand)

Abstract

The health of urban refugees and asylum seekers (URAS) in Bangkok has been neglected and health policies for USAR have not materialized. This study aimed to explore the views of stakeholders on policies to protect URAS well-being in Thailand. This study conducted a mixed-methods approach comprising both in-depth interviews and Delphi survey. The interview findings revealed six main themes: (1) the government position on URAS; (2) opinions on Thailand becoming a party of the 1951 Refugee Convention; (3) NGOs on health promotion for URAS; (4) options on health insurance management for URAS; (5) working potential of URAS; and (6) uncertainty of future life plans for URAS. The Delphi survey showed that URAS should have the right to acquire a work permit and be enrolled in the public insurance scheme managed by the Ministry of Public Health. Moreover, the ideology of national security was more influential than the concept of human rights. The ambiguity of the central authorities’ policy direction to take care of URAS creates haphazard legal interpretations. The Delphi survey findings suggested the need for a more inclusive policy for URAS, however actual policy implementation requires further research on policy feasibility and acceptance by the wider public.

Suggested Citation

  • Sataporn Julchoo & Mathudara Phaiyarom & Pigunkaew Sinam & Watinee Kunpeuk & Nareerut Pudpong & Rapeepong Suphanchaimat, 2021. "Analysis of Policies to Protect the Health of Urban Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Thailand: A Qualitative Study and Delphi Survey," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(20), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10566-:d:652360
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10566/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/20/10566/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Azarnert, Leonid V., 2018. "Refugee resettlement, redistribution and growth," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 89-98.
    2. Caroline Fleay & Lisa Hartley, 2016. "‘I Feel Like a Beggar’: Asylum Seekers Living in the Australian Community Without the Right to Work," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 17(4), pages 1031-1048, November.
    3. Fiona Leh Hoon Chuah & Sok Teng Tan & Jason Yeo & Helena Legido-Quigley, 2019. "Health System Responses to the Health Needs of Refugees and Asylum-seekers in Malaysia: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-21, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Surendran Rajaratnam & Azlinda Azman, 2022. "Refugee and Asylum Seeker Women’s Experiences with Healthcare and Social Environment in Malaysia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-15, May.
    2. Bjertrup, Pia Juul & Bouhenia, Malika & Mayaud, Philippe & Perrin, Clément & Ben Farhat, Jihane & Blanchet, Karl, 2018. "A life in waiting: Refugees' mental health and narratives of social suffering after European Union border closures in March 2016," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 53-60.
    3. Alessandro Maculan, 2022. "Asylum Seekers, Power Relations, and Everyday Resistance Practices: an Ethnographic Study," Journal of International Migration and Integration, Springer, vol. 23(2), pages 431-447, June.
    4. Tomberg, Lukas & Smith Stegen, Karen & Vance, Colin, 2021. "“The mother of all political problems”? On asylum seekers and elections," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    5. Mary Anne Kenny & Nicholas Procter & Carol Grech, 2023. "Mental deterioration of refugees and asylum seekers with uncertain legal status in Australia: Perceptions and responses of legal representatives," International Journal of Social Psychiatry, , vol. 69(5), pages 1277-1284, August.
    6. Phillimore, Jenny & Cheung, Sin Yi, 2021. "The Violence of Uncertainty: empirical evidence on how asylum waiting time undermines refugees’ health," SocArXiv mzsnf, Center for Open Science.
    7. Phillimore, Jenny & Cheung, Sin Yi, 2021. "The violence of uncertainty: Empirical evidence on how asylum waiting time undermines refugee health," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 282(C).
    8. Gallegos Torres, Katia, 2023. "The 2015 refugee inflow and concerns over immigration," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    9. Leonid V Azarnert, 2023. "Population sorting and human capital accumulation," Oxford Economic Papers, Oxford University Press, vol. 75(3), pages 780-801.
    10. Watinee Kunpeuk & Sataporn Julchoo & Mathudara Phaiyarom & Pigunkaew Sinam & Nareerut Pudpong & Tharani Loganathan & Huso Yi & Rapeepong Suphanchaimat, 2022. "Access to Healthcare and Social Protection among Migrant Workers in Thailand before and during COVID-19 Era: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-16, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:20:p:10566-:d:652360. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.