IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i16p8286-d608781.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Methodological Framework for Resilience Assessment of Electricity Infrastructure in Conditions of Slovak Republic

Author

Listed:
  • Zdenek Dvorak

    (Department of Technical Sciences and Informatics, Faculty of Security Engineering, University of Zilina, 01026 Zilina, Slovakia)

  • Nikola Chovancikova

    (Department of Technical Sciences and Informatics, Faculty of Security Engineering, University of Zilina, 01026 Zilina, Slovakia)

  • Jozef Bruk

    (Institute of Lifelong Learning, University of Zilina, 01026 Zilina, Slovakia)

  • Martin Hromada

    (Department of Security Engineering, Faculty of Applied Informatics, University of T.Bata, 76005 Zlin, Czech Republic)

Abstract

The quality of the environment as well as public health is convincingly coupled with the functioning of a power subsector. The power subsector plays a pivotal role in the sense that it emerges as the key cross-sectional element for the society’s functioning (production, services, healthcare, education and others). A modern society consists of infrastructure systems that are primarily dependent on continuous electricity supplies. Each and every element of the electric power infrastructure is unique, and thus, its malfunction can disrupt the functioning of an important part of the electric power infrastructure. In conjunction with ensuring the functioning of electric power infrastructure, our attention must be drawn to the resilience issue. As far as the resilience of electric power infrastructure is concerned, it can resist weather-related events ensuring there are no disruptions in continuous electricity supplies. First, in the introductory part, the article presents the legal framework in the Slovak Republic. Second, it describes the current state of the electric power infrastructure of Slovakia. Third, it handles the state of the level of security risk assessment. Later on, in the literature review, besides turning to the issue of resilience assessment, the authors focused on the area of resilience of power engineering. Furthermore, the article scrutinizes resilience assessment in Slovakia, and it briefly examines approaches towards natural threats. In addition, the article demonstrates several approaches towards flood resilience. Having used different methods, the primary concern is to devise a framework for resilience assessment. Therefore, the included case study examines aspects of the proposed framework for resilience assessment. In conclusion, our aim was, in most respects, to outline an innovative methodological framework for increasing the resilience of electricity infrastructure.

Suggested Citation

  • Zdenek Dvorak & Nikola Chovancikova & Jozef Bruk & Martin Hromada, 2021. "Methodological Framework for Resilience Assessment of Electricity Infrastructure in Conditions of Slovak Republic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-29, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8286-:d:608781
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8286/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/16/8286/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alexis Kwasinski, 2016. "Quantitative Model and Metrics of Electrical Grids’ Resilience Evaluated at a Power Distribution Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 9(2), pages 1-27, February.
    2. Rehak, David & Senovsky, Pavel & Hromada, Martin & Lovecek, Tomas, 2019. "Complex approach to assessing resilience of critical infrastructure elements," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 125-138.
    3. Zdenek Dvorak & Nikola Chovancikova, 2020. "Research of safety management indicators," Technium Social Sciences Journal, Technium Science, vol. 8(1), pages 552-557, June.
    4. Roege, Paul E. & Collier, Zachary A. & Mancillas, James & McDonagh, John A. & Linkov, Igor, 2014. "Metrics for energy resilience," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 249-256.
    5. Martin Hromada & David Rehak & Ludek Lukas, 2021. "Resilience Assessment in Electricity Critical Infrastructure from the Point of View of Converged Security," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Kamia Handayani & Tatiana Filatova & Yoram Krozer, 2019. "The Vulnerability of the Power Sector to Climate Variability and Change: Evidence from Indonesia," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-25, September.
    7. Nan, Cen & Sansavini, Giovanni, 2017. "A quantitative method for assessing resilience of interdependent infrastructures," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 35-53.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Poulin, Craig & Kane, Michael B., 2021. "Infrastructure resilience curves: Performance measures and summary metrics," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    2. Paul, Shuva & Poudyal, Abodh & Poudel, Shiva & Dubey, Anamika & Wang, Zhaoyu, 2024. "Resilience assessment and planning in power distribution systems: Past and future considerations," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    3. Márcio das Chagas Moura & Helder Henrique Lima Diniz & Enrique López Droguett & Beatriz Sales da Cunha & Isis Didier Lins & Vicente Ribeiro Simoni, 2017. "Embedding resilience in the design of the electricity supply for industrial clients," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(11), pages 1-33, November.
    4. Ahmadi, Somayeh & Saboohi, Yadollah & Vakili, Ali, 2021. "Frameworks, quantitative indicators, characters, and modeling approaches to analysis of energy system resilience: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    5. David Rehak & Simona Slivkova & Heidi Janeckova & Dominika Stuberova & Martin Hromada, 2022. "Strengthening Resilience in the Energy Critical Infrastructure: Methodological Overview," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-14, July.
    6. Mottahedi, Adel & Sereshki, Farhang & Ataei, Mohammad & Qarahasanlou, Ali Nouri & Barabadi, Abbas, 2021. "Resilience estimation of critical infrastructure systems: Application of expert judgment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    7. Martin Hromada & David Rehak & Ludek Lukas, 2021. "Resilience Assessment in Electricity Critical Infrastructure from the Point of View of Converged Security," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-20, March.
    8. Linas Martišauskas & Juozas Augutis & Ričardas Krikštolaitis & Rolandas Urbonas & Inga Šarūnienė & Vytis Kopustinskas, 2022. "A Framework to Assess the Resilience of Energy Systems Based on Quantitative Indicators," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-25, May.
    9. Jasiūnas, Justinas & Lund, Peter D. & Mikkola, Jani, 2021. "Energy system resilience – A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 150(C).
    10. Pau Lloret-Gallego & Mònica Aragüés-Peñalba & Lien Van Schepdael & Eduard Bullich-Massagué & Pol Olivella-Rosell & Andreas Sumper, 2017. "Methodology for the Evaluation of Resilience of ICT Systems for Smart Distribution Grids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-16, August.
    11. Adel Mottahedi & Farhang Sereshki & Mohammad Ataei & Ali Nouri Qarahasanlou & Abbas Barabadi, 2021. "The Resilience of Critical Infrastructure Systems: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-32, March.
    12. Plotnek, Jordan J. & Slay, Jill, 2021. "Power systems resilience: Definition and taxonomy with a view towards metrics," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 33(C).
    13. Phylicia Cicilio & David Glennon & Adam Mate & Arthur Barnes & Vishvas Chalishazar & Eduardo Cotilla-Sanchez & Bjorn Vaagensmith & Jake Gentle & Craig Rieger & Richard Wies & Mohammad Heidari Kapourch, 2021. "Resilience in an Evolving Electrical Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-25, January.
    14. Corrado lo Storto, 2019. "An SNA-DEA Prioritization Framework to Identify Critical Nodes of Gas Networks: The Case of the US Interstate Gas Infrastructure," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-18, December.
    15. Pawel Gromek & Grzegorz Sobolewski, 2020. "Risk-Based Approach for Informing Sustainable Infrastructure Resilience Enhancement and Potential Resilience Implication in Terms of Emergency Service Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-30, June.
    16. Adrian Grimm & Patrik Schönfeldt & Herena Torio & Peter Klement & Benedikt Hanke & Karsten von Maydell & Carsten Agert, 2021. "Deduction of Optimal Control Strategies for a Sector-Coupled District Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-13, November.
    17. Shen, Lijuan & Cassottana, Beatrice & Tang, Loon Ching, 2018. "Statistical trend tests for resilience of power systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 138-147.
    18. Trucco, Paolo & Petrenj, Boris, 2023. "Characterisation of resilience metrics in full-scale applications to interdependent infrastructure systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    19. Yao He & Yongchun Yang & Meimei Wang & Xudong Zhang, 2022. "Resilience Analysis of Container Port Shipping Network Structure: The Case of China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-17, August.
    20. Fauzan Hanif Jufri & Jun-Sung Kim & Jaesung Jung, 2017. "Analysis of Determinants of the Impact and the Grid Capability to Evaluate and Improve Grid Resilience from Extreme Weather Event," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:16:p:8286-:d:608781. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.