IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i15p7931-d602173.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Ingestion of GNSS-Derived ZTD and PWV for Spatial Interpolation of PM 2.5 Concentration in Central and Southern China

Author

Listed:
  • Pengzhi Wei

    (College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China)

  • Shaofeng Xie

    (College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Spatial Information and Geomatics, Guilin 541006, China)

  • Liangke Huang

    (College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Spatial Information and Geomatics, Guilin 541006, China)

  • Lilong Liu

    (College of Geomatics and Geoinformation, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541006, China
    Guangxi Key Laboratory of Spatial Information and Geomatics, Guilin 541006, China)

Abstract

With the increasing application of global navigation satellite system (GNSS) technology in the field of meteorology, satellite-derived zenith tropospheric delay (ZTD) and precipitable water vapor (PWV) data have been used to explore the spatial coverage pattern of PM 2.5 concentrations. In this study, the PM 2.5 concentration data obtained from 340 PM 2.5 ground stations in south-central China were used to analyze the variation patterns of PM 2.5 in south-central China at different time periods, and six PM 2.5 interpolation models were developed in the region. The spatial and temporal PM 2.5 variation patterns in central and southern China were analyzed from the perspectives of time series variations and spatial distribution characteristics, and six types of interpolation models were established in central and southern China. (1) Through correlation analysis, and exploratory regression and geographical detector methods, the correlation analysis of PM 2.5 -related variables showed that the GNSS-derived PWV and ZTD were negatively correlated with PM 2.5 , and that their significances and contributions to the spatial analysis were good. (2) Three types of suitable variable combinations were selected for modeling through a collinearity diagnosis, and six types of models (geographically weighted regression (GWR), geographically weighted regression kriging (GWRK), geographically weighted regression—empirical bayesian kriging (GWR-EBK), multiscale geographically weighted regression (MGWR), multiscale geographically weighted regression kriging (MGWRK), and multiscale geographically weighted regression—empirical bayesian kriging (MGWR-EBK)) were constructed. The overall R 2 of the GWR-EBK model construction was the best (annual: 0.962, winter: 0.966, spring: 0.926, summer: 0.873, and autumn: 0.908), and the interpolation accuracy of the GWR-EBK model constructed by inputting ZTD was the best overall, with an average RMSE of 3.22 μg/m 3 recorded, while the GWR-EBK model constructed by inputting PWV had the highest interpolation accuracy in winter, with an RMSE of 4.5 μg/m 3 recorded; these values were 2.17% and 4.26% higher than the RMSE values of the other two types of models (ZTD and temperature) in winter, respectively. (3) The introduction of the empirical Bayesian kriging method to interpolate the residuals of the models (GWR and MGWR) and to then correct the original interpolation results of the models was the most effective, and the accuracy improvement percentage was better than that of the ordinary kriging method. The average improvement ratios of the GWRK and GWR-EBK models compared with that of the GWR model were 5.04% and 14.74%, respectively, and the average improvement ratios of the MGWRK and MGWR-EBK models compared with that of the MGWR model were 2.79% and 12.66%, respectively. (4) Elevation intervals and provinces were classified, and the influence of the elevation and the spatial distribution of the plane on the accuracy of the PM 2.5 regional model was discussed. The experiments showed that the accuracy of the constructed regional model decreased as the elevation increased. The accuracies of the models in representing Henan, Hubei and Hunan provinces were lower than those of the models in representing Guangdong and Guangxi provinces.

Suggested Citation

  • Pengzhi Wei & Shaofeng Xie & Liangke Huang & Lilong Liu, 2021. "Ingestion of GNSS-Derived ZTD and PWV for Spatial Interpolation of PM 2.5 Concentration in Central and Southern China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-26, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7931-:d:602173
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7931/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/15/7931/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hauke Jan & Kossowski Tomasz, 2011. "Comparison of Values of Pearson's and Spearman's Correlation Coefficients on the Same Sets of Data," Quaestiones Geographicae, Sciendo, vol. 30(2), pages 87-93, June.
    2. Wenting Wang & Lijun Zhang & Jun Zhao & Mengge Qi & Fengrui Chen, 2020. "The Effect of Socioeconomic Factors on Spatiotemporal Patterns of PM 2.5 Concentration in Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region and Surrounding Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-16, April.
    3. A. Stewart Fotheringham & Wenbai Yang & Wei Kang, 2017. "Multiscale Geographically Weighted Regression (MGWR)," Annals of the American Association of Geographers, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 107(6), pages 1247-1265, November.
    4. Zhiyu Fan & Qingming Zhan & Chen Yang & Huimin Liu & Meng Zhan, 2020. "How Did Distribution Patterns of Particulate Matter Air Pollution (PM 2.5 and PM 10 ) Change in China during the COVID-19 Outbreak: A Spatiotemporal Investigation at Chinese City-Level," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-19, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zihan Tong & Zhenxing Kong & Xiao Jia & Hanyue Zhang & Yimin Zhang, 2022. "Multiscale Impact of Environmental and Socio-Economic Factors on Low Physical Fitness among Chinese Adolescents and Regionalized Coping Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-24, October.
    2. Yanzhao Wang & Jianfei Cao, 2023. "Examining the Effects of Socioeconomic Development on Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5) in China’s Cities Based on Spatial Autocorrelation Analysis and MGWR Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(4), pages 1-23, February.
    3. Wang, Xiaoxi & Zhang, Yaojun & Yu, Danlin & Qi, Jinghan & Li, Shujing, 2022. "Investigating the spatiotemporal pattern of urban vibrancy and its determinants: Spatial big data analyses in Beijing, China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 119(C).
    4. Alex Bara & Pierre LeRoux, 2018. "Technology, Financial Innovations and Bank Behavior in a Low Income Country," Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies, AMH International, vol. 10(4), pages 221-234.
    5. Hengyu Gu & Hanchen Yu & Mehak Sachdeva & Ye Liu, 2021. "Analyzing the distribution of researchers in China: An approach using multiscale geographically weighted regression," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 52(1), pages 443-459, March.
    6. Jin, Peizhen & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Song, Malin, 2021. "Moving towards a sustainable and innovative city: Internal urban traffic accessibility and high-level innovation based on platform monitoring data," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 235(C).
    7. Javier García López & Raffaele Sisto & Javier Benayas & Álvaro de Juanes & Julio Lumbreras & Carlos Mataix, 2021. "Assessment of the Results and Methodology of the Sustainable Development Index for Spanish Cities," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-29, June.
    8. Pan, Yue & Ou, Shenwei & Zhang, Limao & Zhang, Wenjing & Wu, Xianguo & Li, Heng, 2019. "Modeling risks in dependent systems: A Copula-Bayesian approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 188(C), pages 416-431.
    9. Chunfang Zhao & Yingliang Wu & Yunfeng Chen & Guohua Chen, 2023. "Multiscale Effects of Hedonic Attributes on Airbnb Listing Prices Based on MGWR: A Case Study of Beijing, China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-21, January.
    10. Adriana Gómez-Cabrera & Amalia Sanz-Benlloch & Laura Montalban-Domingo & Jose Luis Ponz-Tienda & Eugenio Pellicer, 2020. "Identification of Factors Affecting the Performance of Rural Road Projects in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(18), pages 1-18, September.
    11. Li Gao & Mingjing Huang & Wuping Zhang & Lei Qiao & Guofang Wang & Xumeng Zhang, 2021. "Comparative Study on Spatial Digital Mapping Methods of Soil Nutrients Based on Different Geospatial Technologies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, March.
    12. Youru Yao & Kang Ma & Cheng He & Yong Zhang & Yuesheng Lin & Fengman Fang & Shiyin Li & Huan He, 2023. "Urban Surface Ozone Concentration in Mainland China during 2015–2020: Spatial Clustering and Temporal Dynamics," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(5), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Bouchra Zellou & Hassane Rahali, 2017. "Assessment of reduced-complexity landscape evolution model suitability to adequately simulate flood events in complex flow conditions," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 86(1), pages 1-29, March.
    14. Judit Bar-Ilan & Mark Levene, 2015. "The hw-rank: an h-index variant for ranking web pages," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 102(3), pages 2247-2253, March.
    15. Patrik Silva & Lin Li, 2020. "Urban Crime Occurrences in Association with Built Environment Characteristics: An African Case with Implications for Urban Design," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-23, April.
    16. Moore, David & Webb, Amanda L., 2022. "Evaluating energy burden at the urban scale: A spatial regression approach in Cincinnati, Ohio," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C).
    17. Ma Zhong & Rong Xu & Xinyi Liao & Shuangli Zhang, 2019. "Do CSR Ratings Converge in China? A Comparison Between RKS and Hexun Scores," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-20, July.
    18. Sun, Long Long & Hu, Ya Peng & Zhu, Chen Ping, 2023. "Scaling invariance in domestic passenger flight delays in the United States," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 611(C).
    19. Hosseinzadeh, Aryan & Algomaiah, Majeed & Kluger, Robert & Li, Zhixia, 2021. "Spatial analysis of shared e-scooter trips," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    20. Yigong Hu & Binbin Lu & Yong Ge & Guanpeng Dong, 2022. "Uncovering spatial heterogeneity in real estate prices via combined hierarchical linear model and geographically weighted regression," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(6), pages 1715-1740, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:15:p:7931-:d:602173. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.