IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i14p7330-d590918.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Bioactive Compounds of Porcine Hearts and Aortas May Improve Cardiovascular Disorders in Humans

Author

Listed:
  • Irina Chernukha

    (V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of RAS, Experimental Clinic and Research Laboratory for Bioactive Substances of Animal Origin, Talalikhina St. 26, Moscow 109316, Russia)

  • Elena Kotenkova

    (V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Center for Food Systems of RAS, Experimental Clinic and Research Laboratory for Bioactive Substances of Animal Origin, Talalikhina St. 26, Moscow 109316, Russia)

  • Svetlana Derbeneva

    (Federal Research Center of Nutrition, Biotechnology and Food Safety, Department of Cardiovascular Pathology, Kashirskoe Sh. 21, Moscow 115446, Russia)

  • Daniil Khvostov

    (V. M. Gorbatov Federal Research Centre for Food Systems of RAS, Laboratory of Molecular Biology and Bioinformatics, Talalikhina St. 26, Moscow 109316, Russia)

Abstract

Functional foods promote health benefits in human metabolism, with bioactive compounds acting as therapeutic agents. The aim was to investigate the biological effects of a pâté made of pork hearts and aortas, minced, sterilised and packed in tins. Adults (61–66 years old) with a body mass index of 26.4–60.7 kg/m 2 (n = 36) were randomly divided into two groups: one group consumed a low-calorie diet (LCD), while the other consumed an LCD with the developed meat product (MP) for 28–30 days. Serum biochemical parameters, anthropometry and blood pressure were measured. Consumption of an LCD + MP by experimental group participants helped to maintain reduced cholesterol levels. The difference in total cholesterol was significantly different ( p = 0.018) from that of the control group, mainly due to the difference in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol ( p = 0.005). Six peptides with potential cholesterol-binding properties and four peptides with potential antioxidant activity were identified in the MP, while elevation of the content of two peptides with potential angiotensin-converting enzyme-inhibitory activity was detected in patients’ plasma. Intervention with the MP can be considered as a supportive therapy to the main treatment for medical cardiovascular diseases due to a positive effect on serum cholesterol.

Suggested Citation

  • Irina Chernukha & Elena Kotenkova & Svetlana Derbeneva & Daniil Khvostov, 2021. "Bioactive Compounds of Porcine Hearts and Aortas May Improve Cardiovascular Disorders in Humans," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7330-:d:590918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7330/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/14/7330/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruben Sanchez-Sabate & Joan Sabaté, 2019. "Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-37, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Youngdeok Lee & Kittichai Watchravesringkan, 2022. "How to Promote Eco-Apparel? Effects of Eco-Labels and Message Framing," International Journal of Marketing Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(2), pages 1-69, December.
    2. Ewa Halicka & Joanna Kaczorowska & Krystyna Rejman & Agata Szczebyło, 2021. "Parental Food Choices and Engagement in Raising Children’s Awareness of Sustainable Behaviors in Urban Poland," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-18, March.
    3. Yingjie Lai & Chaemoon Yoo & Xiaomin Zhou & Younghwan Pan, 2023. "Elements of Food Service Design for Low-Carbon Tourism-Based on Dine-In Tourist Behavior and Attitudes in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-21, May.
    4. Gabriela O. Chiciudean & Rezhen Harun & Iulia C. Muresan & Felix H. Arion & Daniel I. Chiciudean & Garofita L. Ilies & Diana E. Dumitras, 2019. "Assessing the Importance of Health in Choosing a Restaurant: An Empirical Study from Romania," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(12), pages 1-15, June.
    5. Rakhshan Ummar & Kanwal Shaheen & Iram Bashir & Junaid Ul Haq & Mark A. Bonn, 2023. "Green Social Media Campaigns: Influencing Consumers’ Attitudes and Behaviors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Carlsson, Fredrik & Kataria, Mitesh & Lampi, Elina, 2022. "Sustainable food: Can information from food labels make consumers switch to meat substitutes?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    7. Dominika Skolmowska & Dominika Głąbska, 2022. "Effectiveness of Dietary Intervention with Iron and Vitamin C Administered Separately in Improving Iron Status in Young Women," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-19, September.
    8. Diana Kmeťková & Iva Zvěřinová & Milan Ščasný & Vojtěch Máca, 2025. "Acceptability of meat tax and subsidy removal by meat eaters: insights from five European countries," Agricultural and Food Economics, Springer;Italian Society of Agricultural Economics (SIDEA), vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    9. Samson Yaekob Assele & Michel Meulders & Helena Michiels & Nanou Flamant & Martina Vandebroek, 2023. "The Effect of Information Provision and Color Coding in Product Labeling on the Preference for Meat Substitutes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    10. Alina Zaharia & Maria-Claudia Diaconeasa & Natalia Maehle & Gergely Szolnoki & Roberta Capitello, 2021. "Developing Sustainable Food Systems in Europe: National Policies and Stakeholder Perspectives in a Four-Country Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-40, July.
    11. Sigrid Kusch-Brandt, 2020. "Towards More Sustainable Food Systems—14 Lessons Learned," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-8, June.
    12. T. Praveen Kumar & Santosh Basavaraj & K. Soundarapandiyan, 2024. "Can co‐creating in CSR initiatives influence loyal customers? Evidence from the banking industry," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(1), pages 180-195, January.
    13. Giuseppe Di Vita & Simone Blanc & Teresina Mancuso & Stefano Massaglia & Giovanni La Via & Mario D’Amico, 2019. "Harmful Compounds and Willingness to Buy for Reduced-Additives Salami. An Outlook on Italian Consumers," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-9, July.
    14. Jan-Felix Palnau & Matthias Ziegler & Lena Lämmle, 2022. "You Are What You Eat and So Is Our Planet: Identifying Dietary Groups Based on Personality and Environmentalism," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(15), pages 1-19, July.
    15. Bonnet, Céline & Coinon, Marine, 2024. "Environmental co-benefits of health policies to reduce meat consumption: A narrative review," Health Policy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C).
    16. Qurat Ul Ain Sajid & Muhammad Umair Asghar & Haneef Tariq & Martyna Wilk & Arkadiusz Płatek, 2023. "Insect Meal as an Alternative to Protein Concentrates in Poultry Nutrition with Future Perspectives (An Updated Review)," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, June.
    17. Arturo Nickolay Rojas-Tavara & Alberto Jesus Donayre-Torres, 2023. "Microalgae in lab-grown meat production," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 41(6), pages 406-418.
    18. Shahida Anusha Siddiqui & Francesca Gerini & Ali Ikram & Farhan Saeed & Xi Feng & Yanping Chen, 2023. "Rabbit Meat—Production, Consumption and Consumers’ Attitudes and Behavior," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-13, January.
    19. Hernando Barreto Riaño & John Willmer Escobar & Rodrigo Linfati & Virna Ortiz-Araya, 2022. "Disciplinary Categorization of the Cattle Supply Chain—A Review and Bibliometric Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-44, November.
    20. Jörg Rieger & Florian Freund & Frank Offermann & Inna Geibel & Alexander Gocht, 2023. "From fork to farm: Impacts of more sustainable diets in the EU‐27 on the agricultural sector," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 74(3), pages 764-784, September.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:14:p:7330-:d:590918. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.