IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i10p5415-d557543.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multi-Criteria Evaluation and Sensitivity Analysis for the Optimal Location of Constructed Wetlands (METland) at Oceanic and Mediterranean Areas

Author

Listed:
  • Lorena Peñacoba-Antona

    (IMDEA Water Institute, Av. Punto Com, 2, Parque Científico Tecnológico, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
    METfilter S.L., Autovía A49 Sevilla-Huelva Km 28, 41820 Carrión de los Céspedes, Sevilla, Spain
    Department of Analytical Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Alcalá, Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona Km 33.600, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain)

  • Montserrat Gómez-Delgado

    (Department of Geology, Geography and Environment Science, University of Alcalá, Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona Km 33.600, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain)

  • Abraham Esteve-Núñez

    (IMDEA Water Institute, Av. Punto Com, 2, Parque Científico Tecnológico, 28805 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
    METfilter S.L., Autovía A49 Sevilla-Huelva Km 28, 41820 Carrión de los Céspedes, Sevilla, Spain
    Department of Analytical Chemistry, Physical Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, University of Alcalá, Ctra. Madrid-Barcelona Km 33.600, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

METland is a new variety of Constructed Wetland (CW) for treating wastewater where gravel is replaced by a biocompatible electroconductive material to stimulate the metabolism of electroactive bacteria. The system requires a remarkably low land footprint (0.4 m 2 /pe) compared to conventional CW, due to the high pollutant removal rate exhibited by such microorganisms. In order to predict the optimal locations for METland, a methodology based on Multi-Criteria Evaluation (MCE) techniques applied to Geographical Information Systems (GIS) has been proposed. Seven criteria were evaluated and weighted in the context of Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP). Finally, a Global Sensitivity Analysis (GSA) was performed using the Sobol method for resource optimization. The model was tested in two locations, oceanic and Mediterranean, to prove its feasibility in different geographical, demographic and climate conditions. The GSA revealed as conclusion the most influential factors in the model: (i) land use, (ii) distance to population centers, and (iii) distance to river beds. Interestingly, the model could predict best suitable locations by reducing the number of analyzed factors to just such three key factors (responsible for 78% of the output variance). The proposed methodology will help decision-making stakeholders in implementing nature-based solutions, including constructed wetlands, for treating wastewater in rural areas.

Suggested Citation

  • Lorena Peñacoba-Antona & Montserrat Gómez-Delgado & Abraham Esteve-Núñez, 2021. "Multi-Criteria Evaluation and Sensitivity Analysis for the Optimal Location of Constructed Wetlands (METland) at Oceanic and Mediterranean Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-22, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5415-:d:557543
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5415/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5415/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Haibo Zhang & Jianjun Zhang & Shouhong Zhang & Chunxue Yu & Ruoxiu Sun & Dandan Wang & Chunzhu Zhu & Jianan Zhang, 2020. "Identification of Priority Areas for Soil and Water Conservation Planning Based on Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis Using Choquet Integral," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-22, February.
    2. Luca Palmeri & Michael Trepel, 2002. "A GIS-Based Score System for Siting and Sizing of Created or Restored Wetlands: Two Case Studies," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 16(4), pages 307-328, August.
    3. David Moreno-Mateos & Ülo Mander & César Pedrocchi, 2010. "Optimal Location of Created and Restored Wetlands in Mediterranean Agricultural Catchments," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(11), pages 2485-2499, September.
    4. A. P. Vavatsikos & O. E. Demesouka & K. P. Anagnostopoulos, 2020. "GIS-based suitability analysis using fuzzy PROMETHEE," Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 63(4), pages 604-628, March.
    5. Md Ekhlasur Rahman & Mohd Izuan Effendi Bin Halmi & Mohd Yusoff Bin Abd Samad & Md Kamal Uddin & Khairil Mahmud & Mohd Yunus Abd Shukor & Siti Rozaimah Sheikh Abdullah & S M Shamsuzzaman, 2020. "Design, Operation and Optimization of Constructed Wetland for Removal of Pollutant," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-40, November.
    6. Paul, Manashi & Negahban-Azar, Masoud & Shirmohammadi, Adel & Montas, Hubert, 2020. "Assessment of agricultural land suitability for irrigation with reclaimed water using geospatial multi-criteria decision analysis," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    7. Víctor Manuel Rodríguez-Espinosa & Francisco Aguilera-Benavente & Montserrat Gómez-Delgado, 2020. "Green infrastructure design using GIS and spatial analysis: a proposal for the Henares Corridor (Madrid-Guadalajara, Spain)," Landscape Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 26-43, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Chenying Li & Tiantian Zhang & Xi Wang & Zefeng Lian, 2022. "Site Selection of Urban Parks Based on Fuzzy-Analytic Hierarchy Process (F-AHP): A Case Study of Nanjing, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(20), pages 1-27, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nadia Darwiche-Criado & Ricardo Sorando & Silvia G. Eismann & Francisco A. Comín, 2017. "Comparing Two Multi-Criteria Methods for Prioritizing Wetland Restoration and Creation Sites Based on Ecological, Biophysical and Socio-Economic Factors," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 31(4), pages 1227-1241, March.
    2. Salis Deris Artikanur & Widiatmaka & Yudi Setiawan & Marimin, 2023. "An Evaluation of Possible Sugarcane Plantations Expansion Areas in Lamongan, East Java, Indonesia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Junjie Li & Xin Dai & Bei Zhang & Xuehang Sun & Bangfan Liu, 2022. "Development and Path of Reclaimed Water Utilization Policy in China: Visual Analysis Based on CNKI and WOS," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-28, September.
    4. Zolfaghary, Parvin & Zakerinia, Mahdi & Kazemi, Hossein, 2021. "A model for the use of urban treated wastewater in agriculture using multiple criteria decision making (MCDM) and geographic information system (GIS)," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    5. R. Bhalla & Neil Pelkey & K. Devi Prasad, 2011. "Application of GIS for Evaluation and Design of Watershed Guidelines," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(1), pages 113-140, January.
    6. Dorothy Julian Nalumu & Daniel Otero Peña & Daniela Perrotti, 2023. "Leveraging the No Net Land Take Policy through Ecological Connectivity Analysis: The Role of Industrial Platforms in Flanders, Belgium," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-13, November.
    7. Rodney Ronalds & Hong Zhang, 2019. "Assessing the Impact of Urban Development and On-Site Stormwater Detention on Regional Hydrology Using Monte Carlo Simulated Rainfall," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 33(7), pages 2517-2536, May.
    8. Punys, P. & Radzevičius, A. & Kvaraciejus, A. & Gasiūnas, V. & Šilinis, L., 2019. "A multi-criteria analysis for siting surface-flow constructed wetlands in tile-drained agricultural catchments: The case of Lithuania," Agricultural Water Management, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 1036-1046.
    9. Luna Al Hadidi & Amer Sweity, 2022. "Evaluation the Efficiency of Subsurface Flow Constructed Wetland (SSF) for Wastewater Treatment and Reuse in Semi-arid Environment," Journal of Agricultural Studies, Macrothink Institute, vol. 10(4), pages 65-87, December.
    10. Marwa M. Waly & Slobodan B. Mickovski & Craig Thomson, 2023. "Application of Circular Economy in Oil and Gas Produced Water Treatment," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-19, January.
    11. Rosa Puertas & Luisa Marti & Jose-Maria Garcia-Alvarez-Coque, 2020. "Food Supply without Risk: Multicriteria Analysis of Institutional Conditions of Exporters," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(10), pages 1-20, May.
    12. Sotiropoulou, Kalliopi F. & Vavatsikos, Athanasios P., 2021. "Onshore wind farms GIS-Assisted suitability analysis using PROMETHEE II," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C).
    13. Kosar Ebrahimzadeh Azbari & Parisa-Sadat Ashofteh & Parvin Golfam & Hugo A. Loáiciga, 2022. "Ranking of wastewater reuse allocation alternatives using a variance-based weighted aggregated sum product assessment method," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 2497-2513, February.
    14. Maria C. Cunha & Dalila Serpa & João Marques & Jan J. Keizer & Nelson Abrantes, 2023. "On sustainable improvements of agricultural practices in the Bairrada region (Portugal)," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 25(3), pages 2735-2757, March.
    15. François Colin & Serge Guillaume & Bruno Tisseyre, 2011. "Small Catchment Agricultural Management Using Decision Variables Defined at Catchment Scale and a Fuzzy Rule-Based System: A Mediterranean Vineyard Case Study," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 25(11), pages 2649-2668, September.
    16. Hendrik & Yin Yuan & Akhmad Fauzi & Widiatmaka & Dyah Tjahyandari Suryaningtyas & Florentinus Firdiyono & Yang Yao, 2022. "Determination of the Red Mud Industrial Cluster Sites in Indonesia Based on Sustainability Aspect and Waste Management Analysis through PROMETHEE," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, July.
    17. Mohammed Salem & Wasef Al-Zayadneh & Abdul Cheruth, 2010. "Water Conservation and Management with Hydrophobic Encapsulation of Sand," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(10), pages 2237-2246, August.
    18. Ernest Baba Ali & Ephraim Bonah Agyekum & Parise Adadi, 2021. "Agriculture for Sustainable Development: A SWOT-AHP Assessment of Ghana’s Planting for Food and Jobs Initiative," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-24, January.
    19. David Moreno-Mateos & Ülo Mander & César Pedrocchi, 2010. "Optimal Location of Created and Restored Wetlands in Mediterranean Agricultural Catchments," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 24(11), pages 2485-2499, September.
    20. Coruhlu, Yakup Emre & Solgun, Necmettin & Baser, Volkan & Terzi, Fatih, 2022. "Revealing the solar energy potential by integration of GIS and AHP in order to compare decisions of the land use on the environmental plans," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5415-:d:557543. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.