IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v18y2021i10p5311-d556020.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Risk Perceptions of Low Nicotine Cigarettes and Alternative Nicotine Products across Priority Smoking Populations

Author

Listed:
  • Rachel L. Denlinger-Apte

    (Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA)

  • Lauren R. Pacek

    (Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27705, USA)

  • Jennifer Cornacchione Ross

    (Department of Social Sciences and Health Policy, Division of Public Health Sciences, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA)

  • Maansi Bansal-Travers

    (Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Health Behavior, Buffalo, NY 14263, USA)

  • Eric C. Donny

    (Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA)

  • Dorothy K. Hatsukami

    (Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA)

  • Dana Mowls Carroll

    (Division of Environmental Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA)

Abstract

Background: As the U.S. Food and Drug Administration considers a low nicotine product standard for cigarettes, it is important to examine how people who smoke, especially individuals from priority populations disproportionately affected by smoking, perceive low nicotine content (LNC) cigarettes and their relative risk perceptions of alternative nicotine delivery system (ANDS) products, including e-cigarettes and snus, and medicinal nicotine. Methods: Data are from Wave 4 (2016–2017) of the adult Population Assessment of Tobacco Use and Health (PATH) Study. We examined respondents’ absolute risk perceptions about nicotine, LNC cigarettes, ANDS products and medicinal nicotine; their relative risk perceptions of LNC cigarettes and ANDS products compared to conventional cigarettes; and their relative risk perceptions of medicinal nicotine compared to ANDS products. Results: The majority of respondents across priority smoking populations indicated snus, e-cigarettes, and LNC cigarettes were ‘about the same’ level of harmfulness or addictiveness as conventional cigarettes. The majority of respondents indicated e-cigarettes to be ‘about the same’ harmfulness as medicinal nicotine. Conclusions: Our study indicates that adults who smoke cigarettes generally have misperceptions about the harms of nicotine and the relative risks of ANDS products and such misperceptions exist regardless of their racial/ethnic identity, sexual orientation, and gender identity.

Suggested Citation

  • Rachel L. Denlinger-Apte & Lauren R. Pacek & Jennifer Cornacchione Ross & Maansi Bansal-Travers & Eric C. Donny & Dorothy K. Hatsukami & Dana Mowls Carroll, 2021. "Risk Perceptions of Low Nicotine Cigarettes and Alternative Nicotine Products across Priority Smoking Populations," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-22, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5311-:d:556020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5311/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/18/10/5311/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Cobb, N. & Espey, D. & King, J., 2014. "Health behaviors and risk factors among American Indians and Alaska natives, 2000û2010," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(S3), pages 481-489.
    2. Kim A. G. J. Romijnders & Liesbeth Van Osch & Hein De Vries & Reinskje Talhout, 2018. "Perceptions and Reasons Regarding E-Cigarette Use among Users and Non-Users: A Narrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, June.
    3. Washington, H.A., 2002. "Burning love: Big tobacco takes aim at LGBT youths," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(7), pages 1086-1095.
    4. Baig, Sabeeh A. & Pepper, Jessica K. & Morgan, Jennifer C. & Brewer, Noel T., 2017. "Social identity and support for counteracting tobacco company marketing that targets vulnerable populations," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 182(C), pages 136-141.
    5. Lee, J.G.L. & Henriksen, L. & Rose, S.W. & Moreland-Russell, S. & Ribisl, K.M., 2015. "A systematic review of neighborhood disparities in point-of-sale tobacco marketing," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(9), pages 8-18.
    6. Espey, D.K. & Jim, M.A. & Cobb, N. & Bartholomew, M. & Becker, T. & Haverkamp, D. & Plescia, M., 2014. "Leading causes of death and all-cause mortality in American Indians and Alaska Natives," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(S3), pages 303-311.
    7. Popova, L. & Ling, P.M., 2013. "Perceptions of relative risk of snus and cigarettes among US smokers," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(11), pages 21-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Akash Patel & Jana L. Hirschtick & Steven Cook & Bukola Usidame & Ritesh Mistry & David T. Levy & Rafael Meza & Nancy L. Fleischer, 2021. "Sociodemographic Patterns of Exclusive and Dual Use of ENDS and Menthol/Non-Menthol Cigarettes among US Youth (Ages 15–17) Using Two Nationally Representative Surveys (2013–2017)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-16, July.
    2. Joseph G. L. Lee & Adam O. Goldstein & William K. Pan & Kurt M. Ribisl, 2015. "Relationship Between Tobacco Retailers’ Point-of-Sale Marketing and the Density of Same-Sex Couples, 97 U.S. Counties, 2012," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Kiana Wilkins, 2022. "Intersectional Immunity? Examining How Race/Ethnicity and Sexual Orientation Combine to Shape Influenza Vaccination Among US Adults," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 41(6), pages 2585-2612, December.
    4. Lauren R. Pacek & Michael D. Sawdey & Kimberly H. Nguyen & Maria Cooper & Eunice Park-Lee & Amy L. Gross & Elisabeth A. Donaldson & Karen A. Cullen, 2023. "Trends and Associations of Past-30-Day Cigar Smoking in the U.S. by Age, Race/Ethnicity, and Sex, NSDUH 2002–2020," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(18), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Graham F. Moore & Lianna Angel & Linsay Gray & Lauren Copeland & Jordan Van Godwin & Jeremy Segrott & Britt Hallingberg, 2020. "Associations of Socioeconomic Status, Parental Smoking and Parental E-Cigarette Use with 10–11-Year-Old Children’s Perceptions of Tobacco Cigarettes and E-Cigarettes: Cross Sectional Analysis of the C," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(3), pages 1-16, January.
    6. Jeremy Mennis & Gerald J. Stahler & Michael J. Mason, 2016. "Risky Substance Use Environments and Addiction: A New Frontier for Environmental Justice Research," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-15, June.
    7. Melinda Pénzes & Márta Bakacs & Zoltán Brys & József Vitrai & Gergely Tóth & Zombor Berezvai & Róbert Urbán, 2021. "Vaping-Related Adverse Events and Perceived Health Improvements: A Cross-Sectional Survey among Daily E-Cigarette Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-15, August.
    8. Timian M. Godfrey & Edgar A. Villavicencio & Kimberly Barra & Priscilla R. Sanderson & Kimberly Shea & Xiaoxiao Sun & David O. Garcia, 2022. "Advancing Liver Cancer Prevention for American Indian Populations in Arizona: An Integrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(6), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Muhammad Aziz Rahman & Bindu Joseph & Naima Nimmi, 2022. "Electronic Cigarettes or Vaping: Are There Any Differences in the Profiles, Use and Perceptions between a Developed and a Developing Country?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-13, February.
    10. Holmes, Louisa M. & McQuoid, Julia & Shah, Aekta & Cruz, Tessa & Akom, Antwi & Ling, Pamela M., 2021. "Piloting a spatial mixed method for understanding neighborhood tobacco use disparities," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 291(C).
    11. Joseph G. L. Lee & Adam O. Goldstein & Leah M. Ranney & Jeff Crist & Anna McCullough, 2011. "High Tobacco Use among Lesbian, Gay, and Bisexual Populations in West Virginian Bars and Community Festivals," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 8(7), pages 1-12, July.
    12. Mohammed M. Alqahtani & Zachary B. Massey & Robert T. Fairman & Victoria Churchill & David L. Ashley & Lucy Popova, 2022. "General and Device-Specific Reasons for ENDS Use: A Qualitative Study with Adult ENDS Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-14, June.
    13. Michelle Estradé & Ellen J. I. van Dongen & Angela C. B. Trude & Lisa Poirier & Sheila Fleischhacker & Caroline R. Wensel & Leslie C. Redmond & Marla Pardilla & Jacqueline Swartz & Margarita S. Treuth, 2021. "Exposure to a Multilevel, Multicomponent Obesity Prevention Intervention (OPREVENT2) in Rural Native American Communities: Variability and Association with Change in Diet Quality," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-11, November.
    14. Shrestha, Vinish, 2020. "Maternal education and infant health gradient: New answers to old questions," Economics & Human Biology, Elsevier, vol. 39(C).
    15. Akee, Randall K. Q. & Feir, Donn. L. & Gorzig, Marina Mileo & Myers Jr, Samuel, 2022. "Native American "Deaths of Despair" and Economic Conditions," IZA Discussion Papers 15546, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    16. Arielle R. Deutsch & Rebecca Lustfield & Mohammad S. Jalali, 2022. "Community‐based system dynamics modelling of stigmatized public health issues: Increasing diverse representation of individuals with personal experiences," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(4), pages 734-749, July.
    17. Kim A.G.J. Romijnders & Liesbeth van Osch & Hein de Vries & Reinskje Talhout, 2019. "A Deliberate Choice? Exploring the Decision to Switch from Cigarettes to E-Cigarettes," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-11, February.
    18. Rachelle Annechino & Tamar M.J. Antin, 2019. "Truth Telling about Tobacco and Nicotine," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-5, February.
    19. Kim A.G.J. Romijnders & Jeroen L.A. Pennings & Liesbeth van Osch & Hein de Vries & Reinskje Talhout, 2019. "A Combination of Factors Related to Smoking Behavior, Attractive Product Characteristics, and Socio-Cognitive Factors are Important to Distinguish a Dual User from an Exclusive E-Cigarette User," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-12, October.
    20. WHO Study Group on Tobacco Product Regulation (TobReg), 2016. "Advisory note: banning menthol in tobacco products," University of California at San Francisco, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education qt8td7w55n, Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, UC San Francisco.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:18:y:2021:i:10:p:5311-:d:556020. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.