IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i21p8136-d439704.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Vaccine Hesitancy in the Age of Coronavirus and Fake News: Analysis of Journalistic Sources in the Spanish Quality Press

Author

Listed:
  • Daniel Catalan-Matamoros

    (Department of Communication Studies, University Carlos III of Madrid, 28903 Madrid, Spain
    Health Research Centre, University of Almeria, 04120 Almeria, Spain
    Research Group for Analysis and Anticipation Journalism, University of Nebrija, 20240 Madrid, Spain)

  • Carlos Elías

    (Department of Communication Studies, University Carlos III of Madrid, 28903 Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

The study of the quality press and the use of sources is relevant to understand the role of journalists in scientific controversies. The objective was to examine media sourcing patterns, using the case of vaccines as a backdrop. Articles were retrieved from the national quality press in Spain. Content analysis was undertaken on the sources and on other variables such as tone, frames and journalistic genre. The software myNews and NVivo were used for data collection and coding, while SPSS and Excel were used for statistical analysis. Findings indicate that sources related to the government, professional associations and scientific companies are the most frequently used, confirming the central role of government institutions as journalistic sources. These were followed by university scientists, scientific journals and clinicians. On the other hand, NGOs and patients groups were included in fewer than 5% of the articles. More than 30% included none or just one source expressing unbalanced perspectives. Frequent use of certain source types, particularly governmental, may indicate state structures of power. The study provides a better understanding of journalistic routines in the coverage of vaccines, including fresh perspectives in the current COVID-19 pandemic.

Suggested Citation

  • Daniel Catalan-Matamoros & Carlos Elías, 2020. "Vaccine Hesitancy in the Age of Coronavirus and Fake News: Analysis of Journalistic Sources in the Spanish Quality Press," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8136-:d:439704
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8136/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/21/8136/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. An Nguyen & Daniel Catalan-Matamoros, 2020. "Digital Mis/Disinformation and Public Engagement with Health and Science Controversies: Fresh Perspectives from Covid-19," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 323-328.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Andrea Langbecker & Daniel Catalan-Matamoros, 2021. "Who Guides Vaccination in the Portuguese Press? An Analysis of Information Sources," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-10, February.
    2. María Jesús Fernández-Torres & Ana Almansa-Martínez & Rocío Chamizo-Sánchez, 2021. "Infodemic and Fake News in Spain during the COVID-19 Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-13, February.
    3. Laura Picazo-Sánchez & Rosa Domínguez-Martín & David García-Marín, 2022. "Health Promotion on Instagram: Descriptive–Correlational Study and Predictive Factors of Influencers’ Content," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-15, November.
    4. Luis Cárcamo-Ulloa & Camila Cárdenas-Neira & Eliana Scheihing-García & Diego Sáez-Trumper & Matthieu Vernier & Carlos Blaña-Romero, 2023. "On Politics and Pandemic: How Do Chilean Media Talk about Disinformation and Fake News in Their Social Networks?," Societies, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    5. Hedviga Tkacová & Roman Králik & Miroslav Tvrdoň & Zita Jenisová & José García Martin, 2022. "Credibility and Involvement of Social Media in Education—Recommendations for Mitigating the Negative Effects of the Pandemic among High School Students," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-22, February.
    6. Daniel Muñoz-Sastre & Luis Rodrigo-Martín & Isabel Rodrigo-Martín, 2021. "The Role of Twitter in the WHO’s Fight against the Infodemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-13, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jacques Bughin & Michele Cincera & Kelly Peters & Dorota Reykowska & Marcin Zyszkiewicz & Rafal Ohme, 2021. "Make it or Break it: Vaccination Intention at the Time of Covid-19," Working Papers TIMES² 2021-043, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    2. Vicente Javier Clemente-Suárez & Eduardo Navarro-Jiménez & Juan Antonio Simón-Sanjurjo & Ana Isabel Beltran-Velasco & Carmen Cecilia Laborde-Cárdenas & Juan Camilo Benitez-Agudelo & Álvaro Bustamante-, 2022. "Mis–Dis Information in COVID-19 Health Crisis: A Narrative Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(9), pages 1-24, April.
    3. Jacques Bughin & Michele Cincera & Dorota Reykowska & Rafal Ohme, 2021. "Big Data is Decision Science: the Case of Covid-19 Vaccination," Working Papers TIMES² 2021-047, ULB -- Universite Libre de Bruxelles.
    4. Federica Maria Magarini & Margherita Pinelli & Arianna Sinisi & Silvia Ferrari & Giovanna Laura De Fazio & Gian Maria Galeazzi, 2021. "Irrational Beliefs about COVID-19: A Scoping Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(19), pages 1-21, September.
    5. Daniel Muñoz-Sastre & Luis Rodrigo-Martín & Isabel Rodrigo-Martín, 2021. "The Role of Twitter in the WHO’s Fight against the Infodemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(22), pages 1-13, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:21:p:8136-:d:439704. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.