IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/cog/meanco/v8y2020i2p323-328.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digital Mis/Disinformation and Public Engagement with Health and Science Controversies: Fresh Perspectives from Covid-19

Author

Listed:
  • An Nguyen

    (Department of Communication and Journalism, Bournemouth University, UK)

  • Daniel Catalan-Matamoros

    (Department of Communication Studies, University Carlos III of Madrid, Spain)

Abstract

Digital media, while opening a vast array of avenues for lay people to effectively engage with news, information and debates about important science and health issues, have become a fertile land for various stakeholders to spread misinformation and disinformation, stimulate uncivil discussions and engender ill-informed, dangerous public decisions. Recent developments of the Covid-19 infodemic might just be the tipping point of a process that has been long simmering in controversial areas of health and science (e.g., climate-change denial, anti-vaccination, anti-5G, Flat Earth doctrines). We bring together a wide range of fresh data and perspectives from four continents to help media scholars, journalists, science communicators, scientists, health professionals and policy-makers to better undersand these developments and what can be done to mitigate their impacts on public engagement with health and science controversies.

Suggested Citation

  • An Nguyen & Daniel Catalan-Matamoros, 2020. "Digital Mis/Disinformation and Public Engagement with Health and Science Controversies: Fresh Perspectives from Covid-19," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 323-328.
    • Handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:2:p:323-328
    DOI: 10.17645/mac.v8i2.3352
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.cogitatiopress.com/mediaandcommunication/article/view/3352
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.17645/mac.v8i2.3352?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Joachim Allgaier, 2020. "Rezo and German Climate Change Policy: The Influence of Networked Expertise on YouTube and Beyond," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 376-386.
    2. Sarah Kohler & Isabell Koinig, 2020. "Health and Scientific Frames in Online Communication of Tick-Borne Encephalitis: Antecedents of Frame Recognition," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 413-424.
    3. Elena Milani & Emma Weitkamp & Peter Webb, 2020. "The Visual Vaccine Debate on Twitter: A Social Network Analysis," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 364-375.
    4. Hoa Nguyen & An Nguyen, 2020. "Covid-19 Misinformation and the Social (Media) Amplification of Risk: A Vietnamese Perspective," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 444-447.
    5. Asheley R. Landrum & Alex Olshansky, 2020. "Third-Person Perceptions and Calls for Censorship of Flat Earth Videos on YouTube," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 387-400.
    6. Cornelia Betsch & Frank Renkewitz & Niels Haase, 2013. "Effect of Narrative Reports about Vaccine Adverse Events and Bias-Awareness Disclaimers on Vaccine Decisions," Medical Decision Making, , vol. 33(1), pages 14-25, January.
    7. M. Carmen Erviti & Mónica Codina & Bienvenido León, 2020. "Pro-Science, Anti-Science and Neutral Science in Online Videos on Climate Change, Vaccines and Nanotechnology," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 329-338.
    8. Torben E. Agergaard & Màiri E. Smith & Kristian H. Nielsen, 2020. "Vaccine Assemblages on Three HPV Vaccine-Critical Facebook Pages in Denmark from 2012 to 2019," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 339-352.
    9. Holger Wormer, 2020. "German Media and Coronavirus: Exceptional Communication—Or Just a Catalyst for Existing Tendencies?," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 467-470.
    10. George Ogola, 2020. "Africa and the Covid-19 Information Framing Crisis," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 440-443.
    11. Hoa Nguyen & An Nguyen, 2020. "Covid-19 Misinformation and the Social (Media) Amplification of Risk: A Vietnamese Perspective," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 444-447.
    12. Sarah Kohler & Isabell Koinig, 2020. "Health and Scientific Frames in Online Communication of Tick-Borne Encephalitis: Antecedents of Frame Recognition," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 413-424.
    13. George Ogola, 2020. "Africa and the Covid-19 Information Framing Crisis," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 440-443.
    14. Emily K. Vraga & Melissa Tully & Leticia Bode, 2020. "Empowering Users to Respond to Misinformation about Covid-19," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 475-479.
    15. Kaisu Koivumäki & Timo Koivumäki & Erkki Karvonen, 2020. "“On Social Media Science Seems to Be More Human”: Exploring Researchers as Digital Science Communicators," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 425-439.
    16. M. Carmen Erviti & Mónica Codina & Bienvenido León, 2020. "Pro-Science, Anti-Science and Neutral Science in Online Videos on Climate Change, Vaccines and Nanotechnology," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 329-338.
    17. Asheley R. Landrum & Alex Olshansky, 2020. "Third-Person Perceptions and Calls for Censorship of Flat Earth Videos on YouTube," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 387-400.
    18. Sharon Dunwoody, 2020. "Science Journalism and Pandemic Uncertainty," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 471-474.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. An Nguyen & Daniel Catalan-Matamoros, 2020. "Digital Mis/Disinformation and Public Engagement with Health and Science Controversies: Fresh Perspectives from Covid-19," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 8(2), pages 323-328.
    2. Qiong Dang, 2022. "Research on the Impact of Media Credibility on Risk Perception of COVID-19 and the Sustainable Travel Intention of Chinese Residents Based on an Extended TPB Model in the Post-Pandemic Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Joshua Ettinger & Peter Walton & James Painter & Thomas DiBlasi, 2021. "Climate of hope or doom and gloom? Testing the climate change hope vs. fear communications debate through online videos," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 164(1), pages 1-19, January.
    4. Mariusz Duplaga, 2022. "The Roles of Health and e-Health Literacy, Conspiracy Beliefs and Political Sympathy in the Adherence to Preventive Measures Recommended during the Pandemic," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(14), pages 1-13, July.
    5. Lesley Chiou & Catherine Tucker, 2018. "Fake News and Advertising on Social Media: A Study of the Anti-Vaccination Movement," NBER Working Papers 25223, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Mariusz Duplaga, 2020. "The Determinants of Conspiracy Beliefs Related to the COVID-19 Pandemic in a Nationally Representative Sample of Internet Users," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(21), pages 1-15, October.
    7. Cornelia Betsch & Niels Haase & Frank Renkewitz & Philipp Schmid, 2015. "The narrative bias revisited: What drives the biasing influence of narrative information on risk perceptions?," Judgment and Decision Making, Society for Judgment and Decision Making, vol. 10(3), pages 241-264, May.
    8. repec:cup:judgdm:v:10:y:2015:i:3:p:241-264 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Mohammed Habes & Mokhtar Elareshi & Ahmed Mansoori & Saadia Pasha & Said A. Salloum & Waleed Mugahed Al-Rahmi, 2023. "Factors Indicating Media Dependency and Online Misinformation Sharing in Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-15, January.
    10. Tasja-Selina Fischer & Castulus Kolo & Cornelia Mothes, 2022. "Political Influencers on YouTube: Business Strategies and Content Characteristics," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 259-271.
    11. Katharina Baum & Annika Baumann & Katharina Batzel, 2024. "Investigating Innovation Diffusion in Gender-Specific Medicine: Insights from Social Network Analysis," Business & Information Systems Engineering: The International Journal of WIRTSCHAFTSINFORMATIK, Springer;Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V. (GI), vol. 66(3), pages 335-355, June.
    12. Tasja-Selina Fischer & Castulus Kolo & Cornelia Mothes, 2022. "Political Influencers on YouTube: Business Strategies and Content Characteristics," Media and Communication, Cogitatio Press, vol. 10(1), pages 259-271.
    13. Ian G. J. Dawson, 2018. "Assessing the Effects of Information About Global Population Growth on Risk Perceptions and Support for Mitigation and Prevention Strategies," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 38(10), pages 2222-2241, October.
    14. Phi-Hung Nguyen & Jung-Fa Tsai & Ming-Hua Lin & Yi-Chung Hu, 2021. "A Hybrid Model with Spherical Fuzzy-AHP, PLS-SEM and ANN to Predict Vaccination Intention against COVID-19," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(23), pages 1-26, November.
    15. Samar Binkheder & Raniah N. Aldekhyyel & Alanoud AlMogbel & Nora Al-Twairesh & Nuha Alhumaid & Shahad N. Aldekhyyel & Amr A. Jamal, 2021. "Public Perceptions around mHealth Applications during COVID-19 Pandemic: A Network and Sentiment Analysis of Tweets in Saudi Arabia," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(24), pages 1-22, December.
    16. Milošević Đorđević, J. & Mari, S. & Vdović, M. & Milošević, A., 2021. "Links between conspiracy beliefs, vaccine knowledge, and trust: Anti-vaccine behavior of Serbian adults," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    17. Porismita Borah & Kyle Lorenzano & Anastasia Vishnevskaya & Erica Austin, 2022. "Conservative Media Use and COVID-19 Related Behavior: The Moderating Role of Media Literacy Variables," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(13), pages 1-13, June.
    18. Bo Yang & Chao Liu & Xusen Cheng & Xi Ma, 2022. "Understanding Users' Group Behavioral Decisions About Sharing Articles in Social Media: An Elaboration Likelihood Model Perspective," Group Decision and Negotiation, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 819-842, August.
    19. Indrani Saran & Günther Fink & Margaret McConnell, 2018. "How does anonymous online peer communication affect prevention behavior? Evidence from a laboratory experiment," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 13(11), pages 1-16, November.
    20. Alexandre Gori Maia & Jose Daniel Morales Martinez & Leticia Junqueira Marteleto & Cristina Guimaraes Rodrigues & Luiz Gustavo Sereno, 2023. "Can the Content of Social Networks Explain Epidemic Outbreaks?," Population Research and Policy Review, Springer;Southern Demographic Association (SDA), vol. 42(1), pages 1-34, February.
    21. Zhang, Lianshan & Liu, Piper Liping & Lam, Chervin & Huang, Zhongwei, 2024. "Well-informed or misinformed? News-Finds-Me perception in shaping sexual and reproductive health knowledge and behavioral intentions among Chinese women," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:cog:meanco:v8:y:2020:i:2:p:323-328. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: António Vieira or IT Department (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.cogitatiopress.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.