IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i20p7643-d431688.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Using Peer Crowd Affiliation to Address Dual Use of Cigarettes and E-Cigarettes among San Francisco Bay Area Young Adults: A Cross Sectional Study

Author

Listed:
  • Nhung Nguyen

    (Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA)

  • Louisa M. Holmes

    (Departments of Geography & Demography, and the Social Science Research Institute, Penn State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA)

  • Minji Kim

    (Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA)

  • Pamela M. Ling

    (Center for Tobacco Control Research and Education, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA)

Abstract

Given the emerging tobacco landscape, dual use of cigarettes and e-cigarettes has increased among young adults, but little is known about its associated factors. Peer crowds, defined as macro-level connections between individuals with similar core values (e.g., “Hip Hop” describing a group that prefers hip hop music and values strength, honor, and respect), are a promising way to understand tobacco use patterns. We examined associations between peer crowds and tobacco use patterns by using data from a cross sectional survey of 1340 young adults in the San Francisco Bay Area in 2014. Outcomes were the past 30-day use of: neither cigarettes nor e-cigarettes; cigarettes but not e-cigarettes; e-cigarettes but not cigarettes; and both cigarettes and e-cigarettes. Peer crowds included Hipster, Hip Hop, Country, Partier, Homebody, and Young Professional. Multinomial regression analysis indicated that peer crowds were significantly associated with different tobacco use patterns. Compared to Young Professionals, Hip Hop and Hipster crowds were more likely to dual use; Hipsters were more likely to use e-cigarettes only, and Country participants were more likely to smoke cigarettes only. These findings suggest that tobacco control campaigns and cessation interventions should be tailored to different young adult peer crowds and address poly-tobacco use.

Suggested Citation

  • Nhung Nguyen & Louisa M. Holmes & Minji Kim & Pamela M. Ling, 2020. "Using Peer Crowd Affiliation to Address Dual Use of Cigarettes and E-Cigarettes among San Francisco Bay Area Young Adults: A Cross Sectional Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(20), pages 1-13, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7643-:d:431688
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7643/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/20/7643/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ling, P.M. & Lee, Y.O. & Hong, J. & Neilands, T.B. & Jordan, J.W. & Glantz, S.A., 2014. "Social branding to decrease smoking among young adults in bars," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 104(4), pages 751-760.
    2. Mejia, A.B. & Ling, P.M., 2010. "Tobacco industry consumer research on smokeless tobacco users and product development," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 100(1), pages 78-87.
    3. Moran, M.B. & Walker, M.W. & Alexander, T.N. & Jordan, J.W. & Wagner, D.E., 2017. "Why peer crowds matter: Incorporating youth subcultures and values in health education campaigns," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 107(3), pages 389-395.
    4. Jiang, N. & Ling, P.M., 2013. "Impact of alcohol use and bar attendance on smoking and quit attempts among young adult bar patrons," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 103(5), pages 53-61.
    5. Ling, P.M. & Glantz, S.A., 2002. "Why and how the tobacco industry sells cigarettes to young adults: Evidence from industry documents," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 92(6), pages 908-916.
    6. repec:aph:ajpbhl:10.2105/ajph.2016.303595_1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Catherine A. Hess & Tamar M. J. Antin & Rachelle Annechino & Geoffrey Hunt, 2017. "Perceptions of E-Cigarettes among Black Youth in California," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-11, January.
    8. repec:cdl:ctcres:qt5tp828kn is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Kayzel R. Tabangcura & Rachel Taketa & Crissy T. Kawamoto & Samia Amin & Steve Sussman & Scott K. Okamoto & Pallav Pokhrel, 2023. "Peer Crowds and Tobacco Product Use in Hawai‘i: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-14, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Daniel N. Willis & Mary A. Popovech & Francesca Gany & Carol Hoffman & Jason L. Blum & Judith T. Zelikoff, 2014. "Toxicity of Gutkha, a Smokeless Tobacco Product Gone Global: Is There More to the Toxicity than Nicotine?," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 11(1), pages 1-15, January.
    2. A.L.S. Foong & M.Y.Y. Lai, 2018. "E-Cigarettes for Smoking Cessation: Why do Users Continue with E-Cigarettes?," Asian Social Science, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 14(12), pages 156-156, December.
    3. Sarah D. Kowitt & Allison J. Lazard & Tara L. Queen & Seth M. Noar & Adam O. Goldstein, 2018. "Adolescents’ Aided Recall of Targeted and Non-Targeted Tobacco Communication Campaigns in the United States," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-15, October.
    4. Bo Yang & Jiaying Liu & Lucy Popova, 2018. "Targeted Versus Nontargeted Communication About Electronic Nicotine Delivery Systems in Three Smoker Groups," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(10), pages 1-18, September.
    5. repec:plo:pone00:0244203 is not listed on IDEAS
    6. Lars Ramström & Ron Borland & Tom Wikmans, 2016. "Patterns of Smoking and Snus Use in Sweden: Implications for Public Health," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-14, November.
    7. repec:cdl:ctcres:qt2t823095 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Page D. Dobbs & Jason B. Colditz & Shelby Shields & Anna Meadows & Brian A. Primack, 2022. "Policy and Behavior: Comparisons between Twitter Discussions about the US Tobacco 21 Law and Other Age-Related Behaviors," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(5), pages 1-10, February.
    9. Angdi Zhou & Xinru Li & Yiwen Song & Bingqin Hu & Yitong Chen & Peiyao Cui & Jinghua Li, 2023. "Academic Performance and Peer or Parental Tobacco Use among Non-Smoking Adolescents: Influence of Smoking Interactions on Intention to Smoke," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-14, January.
    10. Nan Jiang & Mariaelena Gonzalez & Pamela M. Ling & Kelly C. Young-Wolff & Stanton A. Glantz, 2017. "Smoke-Free Laws and Hazardous Drinking: A Cross-Sectional Study among U.S. Adults," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-11, April.
    11. Carolyn A. Stalgaitis & Susan Dang & Catherine Warner & Sharon Biggers & LaQuanna Jackson & Jeffrey W. Jordan, 2025. "Youth Tobacco Control in the Digital Age: Impact of South Carolina’s Youth Tobacco Education and Vaping Cessation Social Media Programs," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 22(2), pages 1-20, February.
    12. Madeleine Steinmetz-Wood & Thierry Gagné & Marie-Pierre Sylvestre & Katherine Frohlich, 2018. "Do social characteristics influence smoking uptake and cessation during young adulthood?," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(1), pages 115-123, January.
    13. Dorie E Apollonio & Lauren M Dutra & Stanton A Glantz, 2021. "Associations between smoking trajectories, smoke-free laws and cigarette taxes in a longitudinal sample of youth and young adults," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 16(2), pages 1-17, February.
    14. Kim A. G. J. Romijnders & Liesbeth Van Osch & Hein De Vries & Reinskje Talhout, 2018. "Perceptions and Reasons Regarding E-Cigarette Use among Users and Non-Users: A Narrative Literature Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-19, June.
    15. Chenlin Yu & Ziteng Zhang & Yangang Liu & Ying Zong & Yongchun Chen & Xiuming Du & Jikuai Chen & Shijie Feng & Jinlian Hu & Shufang Cui & Guocai Lu, 2016. "Toxicity of Smokeless Tobacco Extract after 184-Day Repeated Oral Administration in Rats," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-16, March.
    16. Kayzel R. Tabangcura & Rachel Taketa & Crissy T. Kawamoto & Samia Amin & Steve Sussman & Scott K. Okamoto & Pallav Pokhrel, 2023. "Peer Crowds and Tobacco Product Use in Hawai‘i: A Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-14, January.
    17. Scott, Kristin A. & Mason, Marlys J. & Mason, James D., 2015. "I'm not a smoker: Constructing protected prototypes for risk behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 2198-2206.
    18. Allison C. Veronda & Leah A. Irish & Douglas L. Delahanty, 2020. "Effect of smoke exposure on young adults' sleep quality," Nursing & Health Sciences, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 22(1), pages 57-63, March.
    19. Carla J. Berg & Yael Bar-Zeev & Hagai Levine, 2020. "Informing iQOS Regulations in the United States: A Synthesis of What We Know," SAGE Open, , vol. 10(1), pages 21582440198, January.
    20. Draganidis, Adriana & Fernando, Anne Nileshni & West, Madeline L. & Sharp, Gemma, 2024. "Social media delivered mental health campaigns and public service announcements: A systematic literature review of public engagement and help-seeking behaviours," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 359(C).
    21. Laura Campo & Silvia Lumia & Silvia Fustinoni, 2022. "Assessing Smoking Habits, Attitudes, Knowledge, and Needs among University Students at the University of Milan, Italy," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-15, September.
    22. Anderson, Stacey J. & Pollay, Richard W. & Ling, Pamela M., 2006. "Taking ad-Vantage of lax advertising regulation in the USA and Canada: Reassuring and distracting health-concerned smokers," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 63(8), pages 1973-1985, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:20:p:7643-:d:431688. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.