IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v17y2020i11p3844-d364248.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Pedestrian Evacuation Risk Assessment of Subway Station under Large-Scale Sport Activity

Author

Listed:
  • Zeyang Cheng

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
    Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
    School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Jian Lu

    (Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Urban ITS, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
    Jiangsu Province Collaborative Innovation Center of Modern Urban Traffic Technologies, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China
    School of Transportation, Southeast University, Nanjing 211189, China)

  • Yi Zhao

    (College of Automobile and Traffic Engineering, Nanjing Forestry University, Nanjing 210037, China)

Abstract

Pedestrian evacuation risk of subway stations is an important concern in city management, as it not only endangers public safety but also affects the efficiency of urban subway transportation. Determination of how to effectively evaluate the pedestrian evacuation risk of subway stations is of great significance to improve pedestrian safety. Previous studies about the pedestrian evacuation of subway station were primarily focused on pedestrian moving behaviors and the evacuation modeling, and the evacuation scenario is the regular subway operation. There is a dearth of studies to quantify the pedestrian evacuation risk in the evacuation process, especially the pedestrian evacuation risk quantitative characterization of subway station in large-scale sport activity. The current study develops a quantitative pedestrian evacuation risk assessment model that integrates pedestrian stampede probability and pedestrian casualty. Then several different simulation scenarios based on the social force model (SFM) are simulated to evaluate the pedestrian evacuation risk of the “Olympic Park Station” in Beijing, China. The results demonstrate that the pedestrian evacuation method, pedestrian stampede location, and distance from the stampede location to the ticket gate have a large impact on pedestrian evacuation risk. Then, the pedestrian evacuation scenarios with the lowest and highest risk for the “Olympic Park Station” in large-scale sport activity are determined. The findings have potential applications in pedestrian safety protection of subway station during large-scale sports activity.

Suggested Citation

  • Zeyang Cheng & Jian Lu & Yi Zhao, 2020. "Pedestrian Evacuation Risk Assessment of Subway Station under Large-Scale Sport Activity," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-15, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:3844-:d:364248
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/3844/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/17/11/3844/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dirk Helbing & Illés Farkas & Tamás Vicsek, 2000. "Simulating dynamical features of escape panic," Nature, Nature, vol. 407(6803), pages 487-490, September.
    2. Lei, Wenjun & Li, Angui & Gao, Ran & Hao, Xinpeng & Deng, Baoshun, 2012. "Simulation of pedestrian crowds’ evacuation in a huge transit terminal subway station," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 391(22), pages 5355-5365.
    3. Yanyan Chen & Yiwen Cai & Pingpu Li & Guanghou Zhang, 2015. "Study on Evacuation Evaluation in Subway Fire Based on Pedestrian Simulation Technology," Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Hindawi, vol. 2015, pages 1-9, March.
    4. Parisi, Daniel R. & Gilman, Marcelo & Moldovan, Herman, 2009. "A modification of the Social Force Model can reproduce experimental data of pedestrian flows in normal conditions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 388(17), pages 3600-3608.
    5. Kim, Inhi & Galiza, Ronald & Ferreira, Luis, 2013. "Modeling pedestrian queuing using micro-simulation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 49(C), pages 232-240.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jiping Xing & Qi Zhang & Qixiu Cheng & Zhenshan Zu, 2022. "A Geographical and Temporal Risk Evaluation Method for Red-Light Violations by Pedestrians at Signalized Intersections: Analysis and Results of Suzhou, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(21), pages 1-19, November.
    2. Jiexiong Duan & Weixin Zhai & Chengqi Cheng, 2020. "Crowd Detection in Mass Gatherings Based on Social Media Data: A Case Study of the 2014 Shanghai New Year’s Eve Stampede," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(22), pages 1-14, November.
    3. Kai Yu & Nannan Qu & Jifeng Lu & Lujie Zhou, 2022. "Determining Subway Emergency Evacuation Efficiency Using Hybrid System Dynamics and Multiple Agents," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(19), pages 1-18, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Wenhang & Gong, Jianhua & Yu, Ping & Shen, Shen & Li, Rong & Duan, Qishen, 2015. "Simulation and analysis of congestion risk during escalator transfers using a modified social force model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 420(C), pages 28-40.
    2. Xianing Wang & Zhan Zhang & Ying Wang & Jun Yang & Linjun Lu, 2022. "A Study on Safety Evaluation of Pedestrian Flows Based on Partial Impact Dynamics by Real-Time Data in Subway Stations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-19, August.
    3. Fu, Libi & Zhang, Ying & Qin, Huigui & Shi, Qingxin & Chen, Qiyi & Chen, Yunqian & Shi, Yongqian, 2023. "A modified social force model for studying nonlinear dynamics of pedestrian-e-bike mixed flow at a signalized crosswalk," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    4. Ma, Liang & Chen, Bin & Wang, Xiaodong & Zhu, Zhengqiu & Wang, Rongxiao & Qiu, Xiaogang, 2019. "The analysis on the desired speed in social force model using a data driven approach," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 525(C), pages 894-911.
    5. Wan, Jiahui & Sui, Jie & Yu, Hua, 2014. "Research on evacuation in the subway station in China based on the Combined Social Force Model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 394(C), pages 33-46.
    6. Guo, Ren-Yong, 2014. "Simulation of spatial and temporal separation of pedestrian counter flow through a bottleneck," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 415(C), pages 428-439.
    7. Ziyou Gao & Yunchao Qu & Xingang Li & Jiancheng Long & Hai-Jun Huang, 2014. "Simulating the Dynamic Escape Process in Large Public Places," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 62(6), pages 1344-1357, December.
    8. Yamamoto, Hiroki & Yanagisawa, Daichi & Feliciani, Claudio & Nishinari, Katsuhiro, 2019. "Body-rotation behavior of pedestrians for collision avoidance in passing and cross flow," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 122(C), pages 486-510.
    9. Heng Wang & Tiandong Xu & Feng Li, 2021. "A Novel Emergency Evacuation Model of Subway Station Passengers Considering Personality Traits," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-15, September.
    10. Zhang, Zhao & Fu, Daocheng, 2022. "Modeling pedestrian–vehicle mixed-flow in a complex evacuation scenario," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 599(C).
    11. Johansson, Fredrik & Peterson, Anders & Tapani, Andreas, 2015. "Waiting pedestrians in the social force model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 419(C), pages 95-107.
    12. Li, Wenhang & Gong, Jianhua & Yu, Ping & Shen, Shen, 2016. "Modeling, simulation and analysis of group trampling risks during escalator transfers," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 444(C), pages 970-984.
    13. Geng, Zhongfei & Li, Xingli & Kuang, Hua & Bai, Xuecen & Fan, Yanhong, 2019. "Effect of uncertain information on pedestrian dynamics under adverse sight conditions," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 521(C), pages 681-691.
    14. García, Ander & Hernández-Delfin, Dariel & Lee, Dae-Jin & Ellero, Marco, 2023. "Limited visual range in the Social Force Model: Effects on macroscopic and microscopic dynamics," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 612(C).
    15. Xiao, Tianyi & Mu, Tong & Shen, Sunle & Song, Yiming & Yang, Shufan & He, Jie, 2022. "A dynamic physical-distancing model to evaluate spatial measures for prevention of Covid-19 spread," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 592(C).
    16. Li, Wenhang & Gong, Jianhua & Yu, Ping & Shen, Shen & Li, Rong & Duan, Qishen, 2014. "Simulation and analysis of individual trampling risk during escalator transfers," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 408(C), pages 119-133.
    17. Xue Lin & Long Cheng & Shuo Zhang & Qianling Wang, 2023. "Simulating the Effects of Gate Machines on Crowd Traffic Based on the Modified Social Force Model," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-12, February.
    18. Wu, Pei-Yang & Guo, Ren-Yong, 2021. "Simulation of pedestrian flows through queues: Effect of interaction and intersecting angle," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 570(C).
    19. Pierrot Derjany & Sirish Namilae & Dahai Liu & Ashok Srinivasan, 2020. "Multiscale model for the optimal design of pedestrian queues to mitigate infectious disease spread," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(7), pages 1-21, July.
    20. Guo, Ning & Hu, Mao-Bin & Jiang, Rui, 2017. "Impact of variable body size on pedestrian dynamics by heuristics-based model," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 465(C), pages 109-114.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:17:y:2020:i:11:p:3844-:d:364248. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.