IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jijerp/v12y2015i11p13794-13806d57926.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Understanding Walking Behavior among University Students Using Theory of Planned Behavior

Author

Listed:
  • Guibo Sun

    (Institute of Space and Earth Information Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, FYT Bldg., CUHK, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China)

  • Ransford A. Acheampong

    (Lab of Interdisciplinary Spatial Analysis, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge, 19 Silver Street, Cambridge CB3 9EP, UK)

  • Hui Lin

    (Institute of Space and Earth Information Science, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, FYT Bldg., CUHK, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China
    Department of Geography and Resource Management, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, WFY Bldg., CUHK, Shatin, N.T., Hong Kong, China
    Shenzhen Research Institute, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, 2nd Yuexing Road, Nanshan District, Shenzhen 518057, China)

  • Vivian C. Pun

    (Department of Health Sciences, Northeast University, Boston, MA 02115, USA)

Abstract

Walking has been shown to improve physical and mental well-being, yet insufficient walking among university students has been increasingly reported. This study aimed to understand walking behavior of university students using theory of planned behavior (TPB). We recruited 169 undergraduate students by university mass email of the Chinese University of Hong Kong, and first administered a salient belief elicitation survey, which was used to design the TPB questionnaire, to a subset of the study sample. Secondly, all participants completed the TPB questionnaire and walking-oriented diary in a two-day period in December 2012. We mapped the walking behavior data obtained from the diary using geographic information system, and examined the extent to which TPB constructs explained walking intentions and walking behavior using Structural equation model (SEM). We found perceived behavioral control to be the key determinant of walking intention. Shaped by participants’ perceived behavioral control, attitude toward walking and subjective norms, and behavioral intention, in turn had a moderate explanatory effect on their walking behavior. In summary, our findings suggest that walking behavior among university students can be understood within the TPB framework, and could inform walking promotion interventions on the university campuses.

Suggested Citation

  • Guibo Sun & Ransford A. Acheampong & Hui Lin & Vivian C. Pun, 2015. "Understanding Walking Behavior among University Students Using Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(11), pages 1-13, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:11:p:13794-13806:d:57926
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/11/13794/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/12/11/13794/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Darker, Catherine D. & Larkin, Michael & French, David P., 2007. "An exploration of walking behaviour--An interpretative phenomenological approach," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 65(10), pages 2172-2183, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Song-Lin Wong & Cheng-Chin Hsu & Han-Shen Chen, 2018. "To Buy or Not to Buy? Consumer Attitudes and Purchase Intentions for Suboptimal Food," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Leiming Li & Yu Zhang, 2023. "An extended theory of planned behavior to explain the intention to use carsharing: a multi-group analysis of different sociodemographic characteristics," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 143-181, February.
    3. Hongyun Si & Jian-gang Shi & Daizhong Tang & Shiping Wen & Wei Miao & Kaifeng Duan, 2019. "Application of the Theory of Planned Behavior in Environmental Science: A Comprehensive Bibliometric Analysis," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-26, August.
    4. Hossain Mohiuddin & Md Musfiqur Rahman Bhuiya & Shaila Jamal & Zhi Chen, 2022. "Exploring the Choice of Bicycling and Walking in Rajshahi, Bangladesh: An Application of Integrated Choice and Latent Variable (ICLV) Models," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-20, November.
    5. Chung Gun Lee & Susan E. Middlestadt & Seiyeong Park & Junhye Kwon & Kyoungmin Noh & Dong-il Seo & Wook Song & Jung-jun Park & Han-joon Lee & Hyun Joo Kang & Yeon Soon Ahn, 2020. "Predicting Voluntary Exercise Training among Korean Firefighters: Using Elicitation Study and the Theory of Planned Behavior," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(2), pages 1-10, January.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ayse Ozbil & Tugce Gurleyen & Demet Yesiltepe & Ezgi Zunbuloglu, 2019. "Comparative Associations of Street Network Design, Streetscape Attributes and Land-Use Characteristics on Pedestrian Flows in Peripheral Neighbourhoods," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-23, May.
    2. Sara Dadpour & Jahanshah Pakzad & Hamidreza Khankeh, 2016. "Understanding the Influence of Environment on Adults’ Walking Experiences: A Meta-Synthesis Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, July.
    3. Lyons, Glenn, 2020. "Walking as a service – Does it have legs?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 271-284.
    4. Hoback, Alan & Anderson, Scott & Dutta, Utpal, 2012. "Health effects of walking to transit," 53rd Annual Transportation Research Forum, Tampa, Florida, March 15-17, 2012 207081, Transportation Research Forum.
    5. Annelise Norlyk & Bente Martinsen & Elisabeth Hall & Anita Haahr, 2016. "Being In-Between," SAGE Open, , vol. 6(3), pages 21582440166, September.
    6. Ralf Risser & Matus Sucha, 2020. "Start Walking! How to Boost Sustainable Mode Choice—Psychological Measures to Support a Shift from Individual Car Use to More Sustainable Traffic Modes," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-13, January.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jijerp:v:12:y:2015:i:11:p:13794-13806:d:57926. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.