IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jgeogr/v1y2021i3p13-237d670430.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Importance of Connected and Interspersed Urban Green and Blue Space for Biodiversity: A Case Study in Cork City, Ireland

Author

Listed:
  • Luke Lambert

    (Department of Geography, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
    Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, T23 XE10 Cork, Ireland)

  • Fiona Cawkwell

    (Department of Geography, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
    Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, T23 XE10 Cork, Ireland)

  • Paul Holloway

    (Department of Geography, University College Cork, T12 K8AF Cork, Ireland
    Environmental Research Institute, University College Cork, T23 XE10 Cork, Ireland)

Abstract

Urban green and blue space (UGBS) is becoming increasingly important for supporting biodiversity, with the spatial configuration of these landscapes essential to supporting a range of taxa. The role of UGBS for supporting biodiversity is well established, but there remains a lack of consensus on the importance of the overall landscape configuration and the scale at which these configurations are analyzed. Moreover, statistical models are often compounded by coarse representations of UGBS that ignore ‘invisible’ spaces (i.e., gardens and brownfield sites). Using Sentinel-2 satellite data and a maximum likelihood classification, a comprehensive landcover map of Cork City, Ireland was produced with reliable accuracy. FRAGSTATS was then used to capture landscape metrics regarding the spatial configuration of the study area, at a city scale and at three spatial extents for each field site. Field surveys at 72 locations captured data on bird species richness and abundance, before generalized linear models (GLMs) were parameterized between biodiversity metrics and the landscape metrics at 50, 100, and 200 m scales. The UGBS classification revealed that two-thirds of the city is composed of green and blue space. The field surveys recorded 62 species in the city, while GLMs revealed that green space was a significant driver in increasing species richness and abundance, while blue space produced inversions in coefficient estimates, suggesting a more nuanced relationship. The edge effect phenomenon was suggested to play a key role in increasing bird diversity, with a diversified and varied urban landscape important. The impact of scale also affected how blue space was viewed as a connective network within the city, particularly in relation to biodiversity metrics. Overall, this study has demonstrated that UGBS is intrinsically linked to bird diversity. Moreover, 38% of the species recorded are listed as species of conservation concern in Ireland, highlighting how urban spaces can provide habitats for vulnerable species and should inform discussion on the role of geography within the implementation of conservation and planning initiatives for urban environs.

Suggested Citation

  • Luke Lambert & Fiona Cawkwell & Paul Holloway, 2021. "The Importance of Connected and Interspersed Urban Green and Blue Space for Biodiversity: A Case Study in Cork City, Ireland," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 1(3), pages 1-21, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jgeogr:v:1:y:2021:i:3:p:13-237:d:670430
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/1/3/13/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2673-7086/1/3/13/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alessio Russo & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2021. "Urban Ecosystem Services: New Findings for Landscape Architects, Urban Planners, and Policymakers," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-5, January.
    2. Monika Kopecká & Daniel Szatmári & Konštantín Rosina, 2017. "Analysis of Urban Green Spaces Based on Sentinel-2A: Case Studies from Slovakia," Land, MDPI, vol. 6(2), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Haifeng Li & Wenbo Chen & Wei He, 2015. "Planning of Green Space Ecological Network in Urban Areas: An Example of Nanchang, China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-16, October.
    4. Paul Holloway & Richard Field, 2020. "Can Rock-Rubble Groynes Support Similar Intertidal Ecological Communities to Natural Rocky Shores?," Land, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-17, April.
    5. Min Liu & Xiaoma Li & Ding Song & Hui Zhai, 2021. "Evaluation and Monitoring of Urban Public Greenspace Planning Using Landscape Metrics in Kunming," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-20, March.
    6. Thoralf Meyer & Paul Holloway & Thomas B. Christiansen & Jennifer A. Miller & Paolo D’Odorico & Gregory S. Okin, 2019. "An Assessment of Multiple Drivers Determining Woody Species Composition and Structure: A Case Study from the Kalahari, Botswana," Land, MDPI, vol. 8(8), pages 1-14, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Caitlin Dalla Pria & Fiona Cawkwell & Stephen Newton & Paul Holloway, 2022. "City Living: Nest-Site Selection Preferences in Urban Herring Gulls, Larus argentatus," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-12, March.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Neier, Thomas, 2023. "The green divide: A spatial analysis of segregation-based environmental inequality in Vienna," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
    2. Alessio Russo & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2023. "Urban Ecosystem Services: Advancements in Urban Green Development," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-4, February.
    3. Pinki Mondal & Sonali Shukla McDermid, 2021. "Editorial for Special Issue: “Global Vegetation and Land Surface Dynamics in a Changing Climate”," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-4, January.
    4. Thomas Panagopoulos & Stilianos Tampakis & Paraskevi Karanikola & Aikaterini Karipidou-Kanari & Apostolos Kantartzis, 2018. "The Usage and Perception of Pedestrian and Cycling Streets on Residents’ Well-being in Kalamaria, Greece," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(3), pages 1-17, August.
    5. Letizia Cremonini & Marianna Nardino & Teodoro Georgiadis, 2022. "The Utilization of the WMO-1234 Guidance to Improve Citizen’s Wellness and Health: An Italian Perspective," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-13, November.
    6. Alessio Russo & Giuseppe T. Cirella, 2021. "Urban Ecosystem Services: Current Knowledge, Gaps, and Future Research," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-4, August.
    7. Greg D. Simpson & Jackie Parker, 2018. "Data on Peer-Reviewed Papers about Green Infrastructure, Urban Nature, and City Liveability," Data, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-10, November.
    8. Chunsheng Wu & Guoxia Ma & Weishan Yang & Ying Zhou & Fei Peng & Jinnan Wang & Fang Yu, 2021. "Assessment of Ecosystem Service Value and Its Differences in the Yellow River Basin and Yangtze River Basin," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-16, March.
    9. Vasyl Yukhnovskyi & Olha Zibtseva, 2019. "Normalization of green space as a component of ecological stability of a town," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(11), pages 428-437.
    10. Greg D. Simpson & Jackie Parker, 2018. "Data for an Importance-Performance Analysis (IPA) of a Public Green Infrastructure and Urban Nature Space in Perth, Western Australia," Data, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-9, December.
    11. Eliza Szczerek, 2021. "The Problem of Densification of Large-Panel Housing Estates upon the Example of Cracow," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-23, December.
    12. Caitlin Dalla Pria & Fiona Cawkwell & Stephen Newton & Paul Holloway, 2022. "City Living: Nest-Site Selection Preferences in Urban Herring Gulls, Larus argentatus," Geographies, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-12, March.
    13. Raziyeh Teimouri & Sadasivam Karuppannan & Alpana Sivam & Ning Gu & Komali Yenneti, 2023. "Exploring International Perspective on Factors Affecting Urban Socio-Ecological Sustainability by Green Space Planning," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Ryan Hastings & Valerie Cummins & Paul Holloway, 2020. "Assessing the Impact of Physical and Anthropogenic Environmental Factors in Determining the Habitat Suitability of Seagrass Ecosystems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(20), pages 1-17, October.
    15. Peng Yang & Shanshan Dai & Honggang Xu & Peng Ju, 2018. "Perceived Environmental, Individual and Social Factors of Long-Distance Collective Walking in Cities," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, November.
    16. Peihao Song & Gunwoo Kim & Audrey Mayer & Ruizhen He & Guohang Tian, 2020. "Assessing the Ecosystem Services of Various Types of Urban Green Spaces Based on i-Tree Eco," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-16, February.
    17. Vasyl Yukhnovskyi & Olha Zibtseva, 2020. "Green space trends in small towns of Kyiv region according to EOS Land Viewer - a case study," Journal of Forest Science, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 66(6), pages 252-263.
    18. Monika Kopecká & Harini Nagendra & Andrew Millington, 2018. "Urban Land Systems: An Ecosystems Perspective," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-4, January.
    19. Dongwoo Lee & Kyushik Oh & Jungeun Suh, 2022. "Diagnosis and Prioritization of Vulnerable Areas of Urban Ecosystem Regulation Services," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, October.
    20. Jackie Parker & Greg D. Simpson, 2018. "Public Green Infrastructure Contributes to City Livability: A Systematic Quantitative Review," Land, MDPI, vol. 7(4), pages 1-26, December.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jgeogr:v:1:y:2021:i:3:p:13-237:d:670430. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.