IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v17y2025i7p287-d1688440.html

Cross-Lingual Cross-Domain Transfer Learning for Rumor Detection

Author

Listed:
  • Eliana Providel

    (Department of Informatics, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile
    School of Informatics Engineering, Universidad de Valparaíso, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile)

  • Marcelo Mendoza

    (Department of Computer Science, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago 7810000, Chile
    Millennium Institute for Foundational Research on Data, Santiago 7810000, Chile
    National Center of Artificial Intelligence, Santiago 7810000, Chile)

  • Mauricio Solar

    (Department of Informatics, Universidad Técnica Federico Santa María, Valparaíso 2340000, Chile)

Abstract

This study introduces a novel method that merges propagation-based transfer learning with word embeddings for rumor detection. This approach aims to use data from languages with abundant resources to enhance performance in languages with limited availability of annotated corpora in this task. Furthermore, we augment our rumor detection framework with two supplementary tasks—stance classification and bot detection—to reinforce the primary task of rumor detection. Utilizing our proposed multi-task system, which incorporates cascade learning models, we generate several pre-trained models that are subsequently fine-tuned for rumor detection in English and Spanish. The results show improvements over the baselines, thus empirically validating the efficacy of our proposed approach. A Macro-F1 of 0.783 is achieved for the Spanish language, and a Macro-F1 of 0.945 is achieved for the English language.

Suggested Citation

  • Eliana Providel & Marcelo Mendoza & Mauricio Solar, 2025. "Cross-Lingual Cross-Domain Transfer Learning for Rumor Detection," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-27, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:287-:d:1688440
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/7/287/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/17/7/287/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow & Chuan Yu, 2019. "Trends in the Diffusion of Misinformation on Social Media," NBER Working Papers 25500, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Hugo Queiroz Abonizio & Janaina Ignacio de Morais & Gabriel Marques Tavares & Sylvio Barbon Junior, 2020. "Language-Independent Fake News Detection: English, Portuguese, and Spanish Mutual Features," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Hunt Allcott & Matthew Gentzkow, 2017. "Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 31(2), pages 211-236, Spring.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Laura Studen & Victor Tiberius, 2020. "Social Media, Quo Vadis? Prospective Development and Implications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, August.
    2. Leopoldo Fergusson & Carlos Molina, 2020. "Facebook Causes Protests," HiCN Working Papers 323, Households in Conflict Network.
    3. Michele Cantarella & Nicolo' Fraccaroli & Roberto Volpe, 2019. "Does fake news affect voting behaviour?," Department of Economics 0146, University of Modena and Reggio E., Faculty of Economics "Marco Biagi".
    4. Bartosz Wilczek, 2020. "Misinformation and herd behavior in media markets: A cross-national investigation of how tabloids’ attention to misinformation drives broadsheets’ attention to misinformation in political and business journalism," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(11), pages 1-22, November.
    5. Florence Namasinga Selnes, 2024. "Adolescents’ experiences and (re)action towards fake news on social media: perspectives from Norway," Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 11(1), pages 1-11, December.
    6. Cage, Julia & Gallo, Nathan & Hengel, Moritz & Henry, Emeric & Huang, Yuchen, 2025. "Fact-Checking and Misinformation: Evidence from the Market Leader," CEPR Discussion Papers 20895, Centre for Economic Policy Research.
    7. Adam Eggleston & Richard Cook & Harriet Over, 2022. "The influence of fake news on face-trait learning," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 17(12), pages 1-14, December.
    8. Stefano Carattini & Ulrich Matter & Matthias Roesti, 2025. "Lobbying in Disguise," CESifo Working Paper Series 12000, CESifo.
    9. Dr. Diala Edwin Lionel & Dr. Uzowuihe Bertha, 2024. "Visual Elements in Digital Technology Platforms and Visualized Communication in Spreading of False Information," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 8(3s), pages 2118-2138, March.
    10. Andrew P. Weiss & Ahmed Alwan & Eric P. Garcia & Antranik T. Kirakosian, 2021. "Toward a Comprehensive Model of Fake News: A New Approach to Examine the Creation and Sharing of False Information," Societies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, July.
    11. Raúl Rodríguez-Ferrándiz & Cande Sánchez-Olmos & Tatiana Hidalgo-Marí & Estela Saquete-Boro, 2021. "Memetics of Deception: Spreading Local Meme Hoaxes during COVID-19 1st Year," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-19, June.
    12. Matilde Giaccherini & Joanna Kopinska & Gabriele Rovigatti, 2022. "Vax Populi: The Social Costs of Online Vaccine Skepticism," CESifo Working Paper Series 10184, CESifo.
    13. Jost, Peter J. & Pünder, Johanna & Schulze-Lohoff, Isabell, 2020. "Fake news - Does perception matter more than the truth?," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    14. Artem Zakharchenko & Tomáš Peráček & Solomiia Fedushko & Yuriy Syerov & Olha Trach, 2021. "When Fact-Checking and ‘BBC Standards’ Are Helpless: ‘Fake Newsworthy Event’ Manipulation and the Reaction of the ‘High-Quality Media’ on It," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-13, January.
    15. Ryan C. Moore & Ross Dahlke & Jeffrey T. Hancock, 2023. "Exposure to untrustworthy websites in the 2020 US election," Nature Human Behaviour, Nature, vol. 7(7), pages 1096-1105, July.
    16. Chaudhuri, Neha & Gupta, Gaurav & Bagherzadeh, Mehdi & Daim, Tugrul & Yalcin, Haydar, 2024. "Misinformation on social platforms: A review and research Agenda," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    17. Giancarlo Ruffo & Alfonso Semeraro, 2022. "FakeNewsLab: Experimental Study on Biases and Pitfalls Preventing Us from Distinguishing True from False News," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-24, September.
    18. Christopher Adamo & Jeffrey Carpenter, 2023. "Sentiment and the belief in fake news during the 2020 presidential primaries," Oxford Open Economics, Oxford University Press, vol. 2, pages 512-547.
    19. Shixiong Wang & Fangfang Su & Lu Ye & Yuan Jing, 2022. "Disinformation: A Bibliometric Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-21, December.
    20. Yesilada, Muhsin & Lewandowsky, Stephan, 2022. "Systematic review: YouTube recommendations and problematic content," Internet Policy Review: Journal on Internet Regulation, Alexander von Humboldt Institute for Internet and Society (HIIG), Berlin, vol. 11(1), pages 1-22.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:17:y:2025:i:7:p:287-:d:1688440. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.