IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v15y2023i4p141-d1117305.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Post-Digital Learning for Rural Development: A Case Study of Open Biotec MOOCs in Colombia

Author

Listed:
  • Carlos Ocampo-López

    (Chemical Engineering Faculty, Centro de Estudios y de Investigación en Biotecnología (CIBIOT), Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellin 050031, Colombia)

  • Oscar Muñoz-Blandón

    (Chemical Engineering Faculty, Centro de Estudios y de Investigación en Biotecnología (CIBIOT), Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellin 050031, Colombia)

  • Leidy Rendón-Castrillón

    (Chemical Engineering Faculty, Centro de Estudios y de Investigación en Biotecnología (CIBIOT), Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellin 050031, Colombia)

  • Margarita Ramírez-Carmona

    (Chemical Engineering Faculty, Centro de Estudios y de Investigación en Biotecnología (CIBIOT), Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellin 050031, Colombia)

Abstract

This research presents an experience of post-digital learning of biotechnology in rural areas in Colombia by implementing a massive open online course (MOOC) for biotechnology education called Open Biotec . The objective was to improve Colombian rural development by creating learning communities around five topics: waste management, environmental biotechnology, bioprocesses, alternative energies, and bio-entrepreneurship. The study utilized various methods, including a socioeconomic diagnosis of a subregion of the department of Antioquia, Colombia, and the creation of MOOCs using the Action Research methodology. The pilot test of the training route in biotechnology involved the progressive development of the MOOC courses that comprise it. Around 918 students from rural areas were trained, and statistical analysis showed that the average grade of the students increased significantly from 6.13 to 7.53 and the median from 6.15 to 8.00. The study results demonstrate how the learning experience designed in the Open Biotec MOOC increases the degree of knowledge of students in this field of biotechnology, offering an opportunity to establish sustainable learning communities with participation and collaborative action mediated by virtual tools. The study concludes that rural education in Colombia could be strengthened with a training strategy for rural communities supported by MOOCs focused on the responsible use of local biodiversity from a biotechnological perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Carlos Ocampo-López & Oscar Muñoz-Blandón & Leidy Rendón-Castrillón & Margarita Ramírez-Carmona, 2023. "Post-Digital Learning for Rural Development: A Case Study of Open Biotec MOOCs in Colombia," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-29, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:141-:d:1117305
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/4/141/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/15/4/141/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Gaspare D’Amico & Katarzyna Szopik-Depczyńska & Riccardo Beltramo & Idiano D’Adamo & Giuseppe Ioppolo, 2022. "Smart and Sustainable Bioeconomy Platform: A New Approach towards Sustainability," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(1), pages 1-22, January.
    2. Diana Elvira Soto Arango & Luis Eduardo Molina Pacheco, 2018. "La Escuela Rural en Colombia como escenario de implementación de TIC," Revista Saber, Ciencia y Libertad, Universidad Libre - Sede Cartagena, vol. 13(1), pages 275-289, January.
    3. Heather Stewart & Rod Gapp & Luke Houghton, 2020. "Large Online First Year Learning and Teaching: the Lived Experience of Developing a Student-Centred Continual Learning Practice," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 435-451, August.
    4. Alfredo Guzmán Rincón & Sandra Barragán & Favio Cala Vitery, 2021. "Rurality and Dropout in Virtual Higher Education Programmes in Colombia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-21, April.
    5. Calin S. Vac & Avram Fitiu, 2017. "Building Sustainable Development through Technology Transfer in a Romanian University," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-22, November.
    6. José Javier Hueso-Romero & Javier Gil-Quintana & Helen Hasbun & Sara Osuna-Acedo, 2021. "The Social and Transfer Massive Open Online Course: Post-Digital Learning," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-17, April.
    7. Treanor, Lorna & Noke, Hannah & Marlow, Susan & Mosey, Simon, 2021. "Developing entrepreneurial competences in biotechnology early career researchers to support long-term entrepreneurial career outcomes," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    8. Adro, Francisco do & Franco, Mário, 2020. "Rural and agri-entrepreneurial networks: A qualitative case study," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. İlkay Unay-Gailhard & Mark A. Brennen, 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: a review study focused on farming as a career option," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508, December.
    2. Georgios Archimidis Tsalidis, 2022. "Human Health and Ecosystem Quality Benefits with Life Cycle Assessment Due to Fungicides Elimination in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(2), pages 1-12, January.
    3. Sandija Zeverte-Rivza & Laura Girdziute & Agnieszka Parlińska & Peteris Rivza & Anastasija Novikova & Ina Gudele, 2023. "Digitalisation in Bioeconomy in the Baltic States and Poland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-20, September.
    4. Samira Yusef Araújo Falani Bezerra & Ana Lúcia Vitale Torkomian, 2024. "Technology Transfer Offices: a Systematic Review of the Literature and Future Perspective," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 15(1), pages 4455-4488, March.
    5. Kuldeep Singh & Madhvendra Misra, 2021. "Developing an agricultural entrepreneur inclination model for sustainable agriculture by integrating expert mining and ISM–MICMAC," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 23(4), pages 5122-5150, April.
    6. Lisa Craiut & Constantin Bungau & Tudor Bungau & Cristian Grava & Pavel Otrisal & Andrei-Flavius Radu, 2022. "Technology Transfer, Sustainability, and Development, Worldwide and in Romania," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-33, November.
    7. Călin S. Vac & Ileana Andreica & Ioana A. Roman, 2023. "Prospects for Research, Development, Innovation and Technology Transfer in Romanian Horticulture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(13), pages 1-26, June.
    8. Elizabeth Martinez-Villarraga & Isabel Lopez-Cobo & David Becerra-Alonso & Francisco Fernández-Navarro, 2021. "Characterizing Mathematics Learning in Colombian Higher Distance Education," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(15), pages 1-14, July.
    9. Unay-Gailhard, Ilkay & Bojnec, Štefan, 2021. "Young Farmers' Attitudes Towards Agri-Environmental-Climate Measures: Do Young Women Farmers Make a Difference?," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315374, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Petra Maresova & Ruzena Stemberkova & Oluwaseun Fadeyi, 2019. "Models, Processes, and Roles of Universities in Technology Transfer Management: A Systematic Review," Administrative Sciences, MDPI, vol. 9(3), pages 1-36, September.
    11. Francisco-Isidoro Vega-Gomez & F. Javier Miranda & Antonio Chamorro Mera & Jesús Pérez Mayo, 2018. "The Spin-Off as an Instrument of Sustainable Development: Incentives for Creating an Academic USO," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-15, November.
    12. Adriano Mesquita Soares & João Luiz Kovaleski & Silvia Gaia & Daiane Maria de Genaro Chiroli, 2020. "Building Sustainable Development through Technology Transfer Offices: An Approach Based on Levels of Maturity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-22, February.
    13. Alfredo Guzmán & Sandra Barragán & Favio Cala-Vitery, 2022. "Comparative Analysis of Dropout and Student Permanence in Rural Higher Education," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-25, July.
    14. José Bestier Padilla Bejarano & Jhon Wilder Zartha Sossa & Carlos Ocampo-López & Margarita Ramírez-Carmona, 2023. "University Technology Transfer from a Knowledge-Flow Approach—Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-21, April.
    15. Kwangsoo Shin & Eungdo Kim & EuiSeob Jeong, 2018. "Structural Relationship and Influence between Open Innovation Capacities and Performances," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(8), pages 1-18, August.
    16. Alana Corsi & Fabiane Florencio Souza & Regina Negri Pagani & João Luiz Kovaleski, 2021. "Technology transfer oriented to sustainable development: proposal of a theoretical model based on barriers and opportunities," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 126(6), pages 5081-5112, June.
    17. Marcelo Sili & Jochen Dürr, 2022. "Bioeconomic Entrepreneurship and Key Factors of Development: Lessons from Argentina," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(4), pages 1-28, February.
    18. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2022. "Priorities in Bioeconomy Strategies: A Systematic Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-15, October.
    19. Unay-Gailhard, İlkay & Brennen, Mark A., 2022. "How digital communications contribute to shaping the career paths of youth: A review study focused on farming as a career option," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 39(4), pages 1491-1508.
    20. Fang Li & Sheng Zhang & Yuhuan Jin, 2018. "Sustainability of University Technology Transfer: Mediating Effect of Inventor’s Technology Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-17, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:15:y:2023:i:4:p:141-:d:1117305. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.