IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jftint/v11y2019i9p191-d264117.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Social Network Services Management and Risk of Doocing. Comment on Kim, S.; Park, H.; Choi, M.J. “Negative Impact of Social Network Services Based on Stressor-Stress-Outcome: The Role of Experience of Privacy Violations. Future Internet 2019, 11, 137”

Author

Listed:
  • Stefania Fantinelli

    (Department of Psychological, Health and Territory Sciences, Università “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy)

  • Michela Cortini

    (Department of Psychological, Health and Territory Sciences, Università “G. d’Annunzio” of Chieti-Pescara, 66100 Chieti, Italy)

Abstract

In light of the recent work by Kim and colleagues about Social Network Service (SNS), examining the individual and SNS characteristics as predictors of SNS fatigue, we hypothesize to enlarge their model to the job context. SNS is a relevant issue in occupational life as employers use it to have a deeper knowledge of their employees and as a tool of corporate communication. Employees can use SNS as a social platform and as a way to express discontent. In this latter case, the organization can implement a disciplinary procedure toward employees, known as doocing. The perception of privacy violation is strictly related to the fear and awareness of doocing, which in turn can predict SNS fatigue as well. So, it could be worthwhile to extend Kim and colleagues’ model to the workplace with particular attention to the doocing phenomenon.

Suggested Citation

  • Stefania Fantinelli & Michela Cortini, 2019. "Social Network Services Management and Risk of Doocing. Comment on Kim, S.; Park, H.; Choi, M.J. “Negative Impact of Social Network Services Based on Stressor-Stress-Outcome: The Role of Experience of," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-3, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:191-:d:264117
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/11/9/191/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1999-5903/11/9/191/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Parker, Janna M. & Marasi, Shelly & James, Kevin W. & Wall, Alison, 2019. "Should employees be “dooced” for a social media post? The role of social media marketing governance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 1-9.
    2. Shaukat Ali & Naveed Islam & Azhar Rauf & Ikram Ud Din & Mohsen Guizani & Joel J. P. C. Rodrigues, 2018. "Privacy and Security Issues in Online Social Networks," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-12, November.
    3. M. Cortini & G. Scaratti, 2011. "Creativity at Work and Weblogs: Opportunities and Obstacles," Springer Books, in: Alessandro D'Atri & Maria Ferrara & Joey F. George & Paolo Spagnoletti (ed.), Information Technology and Innovation Trends in Organizations, pages 443-450, Springer.
    4. Cortini, Michela & Fantinelli, Stefania, 2018. "Fear for Doocing and Digital Privacy in the Workplace: A Dual Pathway Model," management revue - Socio-Economic Studies, Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, vol. 29(2), pages 162-178.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Stefania Fantinelli, 2020. "Can an Abusive Supervision Be a Predictor of Doocing? Comment on Akram, Z.; Li, Y.; Akram, U. When Employees Are Emotionally Exhausted Due to Abusive Supervision. A Conservation-of-Resources Perspecti," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(24), pages 1-3, December.
    2. Laura Studen & Victor Tiberius, 2020. "Social Media, Quo Vadis? Prospective Development and Implications," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 12(9), pages 1-22, August.
    3. Musa Ahmed Zayyad, 2023. "An Analysis of the Privacy and Security Issues Affecting the Usage of Social Media," International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science (IJRISS), vol. 7(6), pages 19-27, June.
    4. Sharifah Sharar Aldalbahi & Abdulmohsen Saud Albesher, 2023. "Young Saudis’ Evaluations and Perceptions of Privacy in Digital Communities: The Case of WhatsApp and Telegram," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-17, July.
    5. Annetta Burger & Talha Oz & William G. Kennedy & Andrew T. Crooks, 2019. "Computational Social Science of Disasters: Opportunities and Challenges," Future Internet, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-31, April.
    6. Michela Cortini & Daniela Converso & Teresa Galanti & Teresa Di Fiore & Alberto Di Domenico & Stefania Fantinelli, 2019. "Gratitude at Work Works! A Mix-Method Study on Different Dimensions of Gratitude, Job Satisfaction, and Job Performance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(14), pages 1-12, July.
    7. Stefan Ivens & Mario Schaarschmidt & Raoul Könsgen, 2021. "When Employees Speak as They Like: Bad Mouthing in Social Media," Corporate Reputation Review, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 24(1), pages 1-13, February.
    8. Parker, Janna M. & Marasi, Shelly & James, Kevin W. & Wall, Alison, 2019. "Should employees be “dooced” for a social media post? The role of social media marketing governance," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 1-9.
    9. Lip Ryan Shin & Sunghyup Sean Hyun, 2019. "Impact of Managerial Influence Tactics on Job Creativity and Performance: A Focus on Korean Airline Service Employees," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(16), pages 1-14, August.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jftint:v:11:y:2019:i:9:p:191-:d:264117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.