IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i9p2174-d1641348.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Voltage Prediction by a Data-Driven Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Hristo Ivanov Beloev

    (Department Agricultural Machinery, “Angel Kanchev” University of Ruse, 7017 Ruse, Bulgaria)

  • Stanislav Radikovich Saitov

    (Department Nuclear and Thermal Power Plants, Kazan State Power Engineering University, 420066 Kazan, Russia)

  • Antonina Andreevna Filimonova

    (Department Nuclear and Thermal Power Plants, Kazan State Power Engineering University, 420066 Kazan, Russia)

  • Natalia Dmitrievna Chichirova

    (Department Nuclear and Thermal Power Plants, Kazan State Power Engineering University, 420066 Kazan, Russia)

  • Egor Sergeevich Mayorov

    (Department Nuclear and Thermal Power Plants, Kazan State Power Engineering University, 420066 Kazan, Russia)

  • Oleg Evgenievich Babikov

    (Department Nuclear and Thermal Power Plants, Kazan State Power Engineering University, 420066 Kazan, Russia)

  • Iliya Krastev Iliev

    (Department of Heat, Hydraulics and Environmental Engineering, “Angel Kanchev” University of Ruse, 7017 Ruse, Bulgaria)

Abstract

A solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) is an electrochemical energy conversion device that provides higher thermoelectric efficiency than traditional cogeneration systems. Current research in this field highlights a variety of mathematical models. These models are based on complex physicochemical and electrochemical reactions, enabling accurate simulation and optimal control of fuel cells. However, these models require substantial computational resources, leading to high processing times. White box and gray box models are unable to achieve real-time optimization of control parameters. A potential solution involves using data-driven machine learning (ML) black-box models. This study examines three ML models: artificial neural network (ANN), random forest (RF), and extreme gradient boosting (XGB). The training dataset consisted of experimental results from SOFC laboratory experiments, comprising 32,843 records with 47 control parameters. The study evaluated the effectiveness of input matrix dimensionality reduction using the following feature importance evaluation methods: mean decrease in impurity (MDI), permutation importance (PI), principal component analysis (PCA), and Shapley additive explanations (SHAP). The application of ML models revealed a complex nonlinear relationship between the SOFC output voltage and the control parameters of the system. The default XGB model achieved the optimal balance between accuracy (MSE = 0.9940) and training speed (τ = 0.173 s/it), with performance capabilities that enable real-time enhancement of SOFC thermoelectric characteristics during system operation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hristo Ivanov Beloev & Stanislav Radikovich Saitov & Antonina Andreevna Filimonova & Natalia Dmitrievna Chichirova & Egor Sergeevich Mayorov & Oleg Evgenievich Babikov & Iliya Krastev Iliev, 2025. "Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Voltage Prediction by a Data-Driven Approach," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-24, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2174-:d:1641348
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2174/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2174/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Weiwei Huo & Weier Li & Chao Sun & Qiang Ren & Guoqing Gong, 2022. "Research on Fuel Cell Fault Diagnosis Based on Genetic Algorithm Optimization of Support Vector Machine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    2. Chuang Sheng & Yi Zheng & Rui Tian & Qian Xiang & Zhonghua Deng & Xiaowei Fu & Xi Li, 2023. "A Comparative Study of the Kalman Filter and the LSTM Network for the Remaining Useful Life Prediction of SOFC," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-16, April.
    3. Danqi Su & Jiayang Zheng & Junjie Ma & Zizhe Dong & Zhangjie Chen & Yanzhou Qin, 2023. "Application of Machine Learning in Fuel Cell Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-32, May.
    4. Wu, Xiao-long & Yang, Yuxiao & Li, Keye & Xu, Yuan-wu & Peng, Jingxuan & Chi, Bo & Wang, Zhuo & Li, Xi, 2024. "Performance prediction of gasification-integrated solid oxide fuel cell and gas turbine cogeneration system based on PSO-BP neural network," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PC).
    5. Mumin Rao & Li Wang & Chuangting Chen & Kai Xiong & Mingfei Li & Zhengpeng Chen & Jiangbo Dong & Junli Xu & Xi Li, 2022. "Data-Driven State Prediction and Analysis of SOFC System Based on Deep Learning Method," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-15, April.
    6. Yaping Wu & Xiaolong Wu & Yuanwu Xu & Yongjun Cheng & Xi Li, 2023. "A Novel Adaptive Neural Network-Based Thermoelectric Parameter Prediction Method for Enhancing Solid Oxide Fuel Cell System Efficiency," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-17, September.
    7. Sheng, Chuang & Fu, Jun & Qin, HongChuan & Zu, YanMin & Liang, YeZhe & Deng, ZhongHua & Wang, Zhuo & Li, Xi, 2024. "Short-term hybrid prognostics of fuel cells: A comparative and improvement study," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 237(PB).
    8. Meilin Lai & Daihui Zhang & Yu Li & Xiaolong Wu & Xi Li, 2024. "Application of Multiple Linear Regression and Artificial Neural Networks in Analyses and Predictions of the Thermoelectric Performance of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-30, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Zheng & Yu, Jie & Wang, Chen & Bello, Idris Temitope & Yu, Na & Chen, Xi & Zheng, Keqing & Han, Minfang & Ni, Meng, 2024. "Multi-objective optimization of protonic ceramic electrolysis cells based on a deep neural network surrogate model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 365(C).
    2. Song, Ke & Huang, Xing & Huang, Pengyu & Sun, Hui & Chen, Yuhui & Huang, Dongya, 2024. "Data-driven health state estimation and remaining useful life prediction of fuel cells," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 227(C).
    3. Jiang, Deyin & Chen, Tianyu & Xie, Juanzhang & Cui, Weimin & Song, Bifeng, 2023. "A mechanical system reliability degradation analysis and remaining life estimation method——With the example of an aircraft hatch lock mechanism," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    4. Danqi Su & Jiayang Zheng & Junjie Ma & Zizhe Dong & Zhangjie Chen & Yanzhou Qin, 2023. "Application of Machine Learning in Fuel Cell Research," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-32, May.
    5. Tancredi Testasecca & Manfredi Picciotto Maniscalco & Giovanni Brunaccini & Girolama Airò Farulla & Giuseppina Ciulla & Marco Beccali & Marco Ferraro, 2024. "Toward a Digital Twin of a Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Microcogenerator: Data-Driven Modelling," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-15, August.
    6. Rendao Ye & Mengyao Yang & Peng Sun, 2023. "Consumer Purchasing Power Prediction of Interest E-Commerce Based on Cost-Sensitive Support Vector Machine," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-17, October.
    7. Jiaping Xie & Hao Yuan & Yufeng Wu & Chao Wang & Xuezhe Wei & Haifeng Dai, 2023. "Impedance Acquisition of Proton Exchange Membrane Fuel Cell Using Deeper Learning Network," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-18, July.
    8. Meng, Jianwen & Guo, Qihao & Yue, Meiling & Diallo, Demba, 2024. "A Lyapunov-based adaptive control strategy with fault-tolerant objectives for proton exchange membrane fuel cell air supply systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PA).
    9. Jingxuan Peng & Dongqi Zhao & Yuanwu Xu & Xiaolong Wu & Xi Li, 2023. "Comprehensive Analysis of Solid Oxide Fuel Cell Performance Degradation Mechanism, Prediction, and Optimization Studies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-23, January.
    10. Yue Ren & Chunhua Jin & Shu Fang & Li Yang & Zixuan Wu & Ziyang Wang & Rui Peng & Kaiye Gao, 2023. "A Comprehensive Review of Key Technologies for Enhancing the Reliability of Lithium-Ion Power Batteries," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(17), pages 1-38, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2174-:d:1641348. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.