IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i9p2159-d1640586.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation Analysis of Multi-Energy Complementary Off-Grid System Operation

Author

Listed:
  • Yu Lei

    (Energy Planning and Research Institute, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Xiaobin Yan

    (Energy Planning and Research Institute, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Shenhao Yang

    (Energy Planning and Research Institute, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Yu Fan

    (Energy Planning and Research Institute, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Chao Ma

    (Energy Planning and Research Institute, Southwest Electric Power Design Institute Co., Ltd., China Power Engineering Consulting Group, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Qingsong Li

    (School of Electrical and Information, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Yuanfeng Huang

    (School of Electrical and Information, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

  • Wei Yang

    (School of Electrical and Information, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu 610500, China)

Abstract

In the future, China’s demand for centralized industrial development in remote areas will gradually increase, but the operation evaluation analysis of off-grid systems applicable to the development of such areas has not yet matured, and it is an urgent challenge to improve the operation mechanism of off-grid systems and then conduct a comprehensive benefit evaluation of off-grid systems. First of all, this paper focuses on the problem that the existing dimensions of the benefit evaluation of multi-energy complementary off-grid systems are not refined and comprehensive enough, and takes into account their high safety and reliability requirements, as well as the potential impacts on local industries and people’s lives after their completion, and then constructs a more complete comprehensive benefit evaluation indicator system for multi-energy complementary off-grid systems. Secondly, the subjective and objective weighting method based on the combination of the AHP (analytic hierarchy process) and AEM (anti-entropy method) is used to assign weights to the evaluation indicators. Finally, based on the TOPSIS (Technique for Order of Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution) comprehensive evaluation method, a comprehensive benefit evaluation of a multi-energy complementary off-grid system under different operation schemes is conducted, and the example results show that the size of the relative closeness under different operation schemes has a maximum difference of 0.5592, which verifies that the proposed evaluation indicator system and the multilevel evaluation method can comprehensively evaluate and analyze the strengths and weaknesses of multi-energy complementary off-grid systems under different operation schemes, and provide theoretical guidance and decision-making support for the further promotion and construction of multi-energy complementary off-grid systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Yu Lei & Xiaobin Yan & Shenhao Yang & Yu Fan & Chao Ma & Qingsong Li & Yuanfeng Huang & Wei Yang, 2025. "Comprehensive Benefit Evaluation Analysis of Multi-Energy Complementary Off-Grid System Operation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(9), pages 1-20, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2159-:d:1640586
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2159/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/9/2159/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:9:p:2159-:d:1640586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.