IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i2p393-d1569436.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Hierarchical Multi-Communities Energy Sharing Management with Electric Vehicle Integration

Author

Listed:
  • Ruengwit Khwanrit

    (School of Information Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 1-1 Asahidai, Nomi 923-1292, Ishikawa, Japan
    School of Information, Computer, and Communication Technology (ICT), Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Khlong Luang 12120, Pathum Thani, Thailand)

  • Saher Javaid

    (School of Information Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 1-1 Asahidai, Nomi 923-1292, Ishikawa, Japan)

  • Yuto Lim

    (School of Information Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 1-1 Asahidai, Nomi 923-1292, Ishikawa, Japan)

  • Chalie Charoenlarpnopparut

    (School of Information, Computer, and Communication Technology (ICT), Sirindhorn International Institute of Technology, Thammasat University, Khlong Luang 12120, Pathum Thani, Thailand)

  • Yasuo Tan

    (School of Information Science, Japan Advanced Institute of Science and Technology, 1-1 Asahidai, Nomi 923-1292, Ishikawa, Japan)

Abstract

The widespread adoption of Electric Vehicles (EVs) in the smart grid is transforming the traditional grid into a more complex system. EVs have the ability to both charge and discharge, acting as loads that draw high power and sources that inject energy back into the grid. Consequently, energy sharing and management within smart grid communities integrated with EVs have become interesting aspects to study in order to efficiently utilize this energy. However, most existing research focuses solely on energy sharing within single communities, utilizing homogeneous energy profiles and neglecting the potential of heterogeneous energy across multiple communities. EVs also possess the capability to travel to different places and communities, where they can engage in energy sharing with areas that have varying load profiles and prices. In this work, a novel three-level energy sharing management approach is proposed for a multiple community system integrating movable energy storage such as EVs. This model involves three main entities: the Utility Company (UC), Community Energy Aggregator (CEA), and EVs. The energy sharing problem is formulated as a Stackelberg game, with all entities striving to maximize their utility through optimal strategies, including pricing, energy demand, or supply. The proposed model is validated through comparison with typical human charging behavior, as well as single- and multiple-community two-level game models. The findings reveal that the proposed model successfully optimizes pricing and energy strategies, significantly lowering the peak-to-average ratio and smoothing the overall energy profile.

Suggested Citation

  • Ruengwit Khwanrit & Saher Javaid & Yuto Lim & Chalie Charoenlarpnopparut & Yasuo Tan, 2025. "Hierarchical Multi-Communities Energy Sharing Management with Electric Vehicle Integration," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:393-:d:1569436
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/2/393/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/2/393/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ruengwit Khwanrit & Saher Javaid & Yuto Lim & Chalie Charoenlarpnopparut & Yasuo Tan, 2024. "Optimal Vehicle-to-Grid Strategies for Energy Sharing Management Using Electric School Buses," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(16), pages 1-25, August.
    2. Bruno Canizes & João Soares & Zita Vale & Juan M. Corchado, 2019. "Optimal Distribution Grid Operation Using DLMP-Based Pricing for Electric Vehicle Charging Infrastructure in a Smart City," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-40, February.
    3. Zhang, Chenghua & Wu, Jianzhong & Zhou, Yue & Cheng, Meng & Long, Chao, 2018. "Peer-to-Peer energy trading in a Microgrid," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C), pages 1-12.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2021. "How to Procure Flexibility Services within the Electricity Distribution System: Lessons from an International Review of Innovation Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Yiqi Dong & Zuoji Dong, 2023. "Bibliometric Analysis of Game Theory on Energy and Natural Resource," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-19, January.
    3. Wang, Dongxiao & Qiu, Jing & Reedman, Luke & Meng, Ke & Lai, Loi Lei, 2018. "Two-stage energy management for networked microgrids with high renewable penetration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 226(C), pages 39-48.
    4. Elimam, Mohamed & El Moursi, Mohamed Shawki & EL-Fouly, Tarek H.M. & Al-Durra, Ahmed & Al Hosani, Khalifa Hassan, 2025. "Transactive energy trading among multi-microgrids in a distribution network with fair loss sharing," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 381(C).
    5. Matija Kostelac & Lin Herenčić & Tomislav Capuder, 2022. "Planning and Operational Aspects of Individual and Clustered Multi-Energy Microgrid Options," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-17, February.
    6. Park, Sung-Won & Zhang, Zhong & Li, Furong & Son, Sung-Yong, 2021. "Peer-to-peer trading-based efficient flexibility securing mechanism to support distribution system stability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 285(C).
    7. Kirchhoff, Hannes & Strunz, Kai, 2019. "Key drivers for successful development of peer-to-peer microgrids for swarm electrification," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 244(C), pages 46-62.
    8. Lyu, Cheng & Jia, Youwei & Xu, Zhao, 2021. "Fully decentralized peer-to-peer energy sharing framework for smart buildings with local battery system and aggregated electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    9. Lee, Juyong & Cho, Youngsang, 2020. "Estimation of the usage fee for peer-to-peer electricity trading platform: The case of South Korea," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    10. Ning Wang & Weisheng Xu & Weihui Shao & Zhiyu Xu, 2019. "A Q-Cube Framework of Reinforcement Learning Algorithm for Continuous Double Auction among Microgrids," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-26, July.
    11. Lefeng, Shi & Shengnan, Lv & Chunxiu, Liu & Yue, Zhou & Cipcigan, Liana & Acker, Thomas L., 2020. "A framework for electric vehicle power supply chain development," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    12. Wang, Zibo & Yu, Xiaodan & Mu, Yunfei & Jia, Hongjie, 2020. "A distributed Peer-to-Peer energy transaction method for diversified prosumers in Urban Community Microgrid System," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    13. Maarten Evens & Patricia Ercoli & Alessia Arteconi, 2023. "Blockchain-Enabled Microgrids: Toward Peer-to-Peer Energy Trading and Flexible Demand Management," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-24, September.
    14. Tsao, Yu-Chung & Thanh, Vo-Van, 2021. "Toward sustainable microgrids with blockchain technology-based peer-to-peer energy trading mechanism: A fuzzy meta-heuristic approach," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    15. Sara Khan & Uzma Amin & Ahmed Abu-Siada, 2024. "P2P Energy Trading of EVs Using Blockchain Technology in Centralized and Decentralized Networks: A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-17, April.
    16. Bhatti, Bilal Ahmad & Broadwater, Robert, 2019. "Energy trading in the distribution system using a non-model based game theoretic approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Zhaonian Ye & Yongzhen Wang & Kai Han & Changlu Zhao & Juntao Han & Yilin Zhu, 2023. "Bi-Objective Optimization and Emergy Analysis of Multi-Distributed Energy System Considering Shared Energy Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-23, January.
    18. Nizami, M.S.H. & Hossain, M.J. & Amin, B.M. Ruhul & Fernandez, Edstan, 2020. "A residential energy management system with bi-level optimization-based bidding strategy for day-ahead bi-directional electricity trading," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    19. Chen, Yang & Park, Byungkwon & Kou, Xiao & Hu, Mengqi & Dong, Jin & Li, Fangxing & Amasyali, Kadir & Olama, Mohammed, 2020. "A comparison study on trading behavior and profit distribution in local energy transaction games," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    20. Davarzani, Sima & Pisica, Ioana & Taylor, Gareth A. & Munisami, Kevin J., 2021. "Residential Demand Response Strategies and Applications in Active Distribution Network Management," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:393-:d:1569436. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.