IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i2p311-d1565350.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Innovative Approaches of Optimization Methods Used in Geothermal Power Plants: Artificial Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms

Author

Listed:
  • Özgür Özer

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences, Pamukkale University, 20160 Pamukkale, Türkiye)

  • Harun Kemal Öztürk

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Engineering, Pamukkale University, 20160 Pamukkale, Türkiye)

Abstract

In this study, a general description of geothermal power plants is provided, and the optimization methods used are summarized. Following the review of these optimization methods, the advantages of heuristic methods and the success of the developed models are demonstrated. The challenges in optimizing geothermal systems, including the limitations due to their complexity and the use of multiple parameters, are discussed. Heuristic methods, particularly the widely used artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms, are explained in general terms. Recent studies highlight that the combined use of artificial neural networks and genetic algorithms can produce faster and more consistent results. This demonstrates the benefits of using advanced methods for geothermal resource utilization and power plant optimization. An innovative optimization method has been developed using the operational data of an ORC geothermal power plant in the city of Izmir. The computational method, using genetic algorithms with artificial neural networks as the fitness function, has identified the optimal operating conditions, achieving a 39.41% increase in net power output. The plant’s gross power generation has increased from 4943 kW to 6624 kW.

Suggested Citation

  • Özgür Özer & Harun Kemal Öztürk, 2025. "Innovative Approaches of Optimization Methods Used in Geothermal Power Plants: Artificial Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(2), pages 1-26, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:311-:d:1565350
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/2/311/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/2/311/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Chen, Chaofan & Witte, Francesco & Tuschy, Ilja & Kolditz, Olaf & Shao, Haibing, 2022. "Parametric optimization and comparative study of an organic Rankine cycle power plant for two-phase geothermal sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C).
    2. Zhou, Chunwei & Liu, Gang & Liao, Shengming, 2024. "Probing dominant flow paths in enhanced geothermal systems with a genetic algorithm inversion model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 360(C).
    3. Cartelle Barros, Juan José & Lara Coira, Manuel & de la Cruz López, María Pilar & del Caño Gochi, Alfredo & Soares, Isabel, 2020. "Probabilistic multicriteria environmental assessment of power plants: A global approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    4. Madhawa Hettiarachchi, H.D. & Golubovic, Mihajlo & Worek, William M. & Ikegami, Yasuyuki, 2007. "Optimum design criteria for an Organic Rankine cycle using low-temperature geothermal heat sources," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 32(9), pages 1698-1706.
    5. Podlasek, Szymon & Jankowski, Marcin & Bałazy, Patryk & Lalik, Krzysztof & Figaj, Rafał, 2024. "Application of ANN control algorithm for optimizing performance of a hybrid ORC power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 306(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Shengjun, Zhang & Huaixin, Wang & Tao, Guo, 2011. "Performance comparison and parametric optimization of subcritical Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) and transcritical power cycle system for low-temperature geothermal power generation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(8), pages 2740-2754, August.
    2. Li, Tailu & Zhu, Jialing & Hu, Kaiyong & Kang, Zhenhua & Zhang, Wei, 2014. "Implementation of PDORC (parallel double-evaporator organic Rankine cycle) to enhance power output in oilfield," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 680-687.
    3. Anahita Moharamian & Saeed Soltani & Faramarz Ranjbar & Mortaza Yari & Marc A Rosen, 2017. "Thermodynamic analysis of a wall mounted gas boiler with an organic Rankine cycle and hydrogen production unit," Energy & Environment, , vol. 28(7), pages 725-743, November.
    4. Yang, Min-Hsiung & Yeh, Rong-Hua, 2015. "Thermo-economic optimization of an organic Rankine cycle system for large marine diesel engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 256-268.
    5. María Pilar de la Cruz López & Juan José Cartelle Barros & Alfredo del Caño Gochi & Manuel Lara Coira, 2021. "New Approach for Managing Sustainability in Projects," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-27, June.
    6. Kerme, Esa Dube & Orfi, Jamel & Fung, Alan S. & Salilih, Elias M. & Khan, Salah Ud-Din & Alshehri, Hassan & Ali, Emad & Alrasheed, Mohammed, 2020. "Energetic and exergetic performance analysis of a solar driven power, desalination and cooling poly-generation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    7. Li, Jing & Pei, Gang & Li, Yunzhu & Ji, Jie, 2013. "Analysis of a novel gravity driven organic Rankine cycle for small-scale cogeneration applications," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 34-44.
    8. Dong, Shengming & Zhang, Yufeng & He, Zhonglu & Deng, Na & Yu, Xiaohui & Yao, Sheng, 2018. "Investigation of Support Vector Machine and Back Propagation Artificial Neural Network for performance prediction of the organic Rankine cycle system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 851-864.
    9. Ghasemi, Hadi & Paci, Marco & Tizzanini, Alessio & Mitsos, Alexander, 2013. "Modeling and optimization of a binary geothermal power plant," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 412-428.
    10. Alipour, Mehran & Deymi-Dashtebayaz, Mahdi & Asadi, Mostafa, 2023. "Investigation of energy, exergy, and economy of co-generation system of solar electricity and cooling using linear parabolic collector for a data center," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    11. Stijepovic, Mirko Z. & Papadopoulos, Athanasios I. & Linke, Patrick & Grujic, Aleksandar S. & Seferlis, Panos, 2014. "An exergy composite curves approach for the design of optimum multi-pressure organic Rankine cycle processes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 285-298.
    12. Wang, E.H. & Zhang, H.G. & Fan, B.Y. & Ouyang, M.G. & Zhao, Y. & Mu, Q.H., 2011. "Study of working fluid selection of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) for engine waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 36(5), pages 3406-3418.
    13. Dai, Baomin & Li, Minxia & Ma, Yitai, 2014. "Thermodynamic analysis of carbon dioxide blends with low GWP (global warming potential) working fluids-based transcritical Rankine cycles for low-grade heat energy recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 942-952.
    14. Li, Tailu & Fu, Wencheng & Zhu, Jialing, 2014. "An integrated optimization for organic Rankine cycle based on entransy theory and thermodynamics," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 561-573.
    15. Shu, Gequn & Yu, Guopeng & Tian, Hua & Wei, Haiqiao & Liang, Xingyu, 2014. "A Multi-Approach Evaluation System (MA-ES) of Organic Rankine Cycles (ORC) used in waste heat utilization," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 325-338.
    16. Satanphol, K. & Pridasawas, W. & Suphanit, B., 2017. "A study on optimal composition of zeotropic working fluid in an Organic Rankine Cycle (ORC) for low grade heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 326-339.
    17. Liu, Qiang & Shang, Linlin & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2016. "Performance analyses of a hybrid geothermal–fossil power generation system using low-enthalpy geothermal resources," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 149-162.
    18. Liu, Chao & He, Chao & Gao, Hong & Xie, Hui & Li, Yourong & Wu, Shuangying & Xu, Jinliang, 2013. "The environmental impact of organic Rankine cycle for waste heat recovery through life-cycle assessment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 144-154.
    19. Roy, J.P. & Misra, Ashok, 2012. "Parametric optimization and performance analysis of a regenerative Organic Rankine Cycle using R-123 for waste heat recovery," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 39(1), pages 227-235.
    20. Lee, Jui-Yuan & Chen, Po-Ling & Xie, Pei-Shan & Bandyopadhyay, Santanu, 2024. "Design of multi-cycle organic Rankine cycle systems for low-grade heat utilisation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 310(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:2:p:311-:d:1565350. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.