IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i17p4521-d1732881.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Lithological and Petrophysical Parameters in Hydrocarbon Exploration: A Case Study from the Carpathian Foredeep

Author

Listed:
  • Drozd Arkadiusz

    (Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, Lubicz Street 25A, 31-503 Krakow, Poland)

  • Topór Tomasz

    (Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, Lubicz Street 25A, 31-503 Krakow, Poland)

  • Lis-Śledziona Anita

    (Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, Lubicz Street 25A, 31-503 Krakow, Poland)

  • Sowiżdżał Krzysztof

    (Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, Lubicz Street 25A, 31-503 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

This study presents a novel approach to the parametrization of 3D PETRO FACIES and SEISMO FACIES using supervised and unsupervised learning, supported by a coherent structural and stratigraphic framework, to enhance understanding of the presence of hydrocarbons in the Dzików–Uszkowce region. The prediction relies on selected seismic attributes and well logging data, which are essential in hydrocarbon exploration. Three-dimensional seismic data, a crucial source of information, reflect the propagation velocity of elastic waves influenced by lithological formations and reservoir fluids. However, seismic response similarities complicate accurate seismic image interpretation. Three-dimensional seismic data were also used to build a structural–stratigraphic model that partitions the study area into coeval strata, enabling spatial analysis of the machine learning results. In the 3D seismic model, PETRO FACIES classification achieved an overall accuracy of 80% (SD = 0.01), effectively distinguishing sandstone- and mudstone-dominated facies (RT1–RT4) with F1 scores between 0.65 and 0.85. RESERVOIR FACIES prediction, covering seven hydrocarbon system classes, reached an accuracy of 70% (SD = 0.01). However, class-level performance varied substantially. Non-productive zones such as HNF (No Flow) were identified with high precision (0.82) and recall (0.84, F1 = 0.83), while mixed-saturation facies (HWGS, BSWGS) showed moderate performance (F1 = 0.74–0.81). In contrast, gas-saturated classes (BSGS and HGS) suffered from extremely low F1 scores (0.08 and 0.12, respectively), with recalls as low as 5–7%, highlighting the model’s difficulty in discriminating these units from water-saturated or mixed facies due to overlapping seismic responses and limited training data for gas-rich intervals. To enhance reservoir characterization, SEISMO FACIES analysis identified 12 distinct seismic facies using key attributes. An additional facies (facies 13) was defined to characterize gas-saturated sandstones with high reservoir quality and accumulation potential. Refinements were performed using borehole data on hydrocarbon-bearing zones and clay volume (VCL), applying a 0.3 VCL cutoff and filtering specific facies to isolate zones with confirmed gas presence. The same approach was applied to PETRO FACIES and a new RT facie was extracted. This integrated approach improved mapping of lithological variability and hydrocarbon saturation in complex geological settings. The results were validated against two blind wells that were excluded from the machine learning process. Knowledge of the presence of gas in well N-1 and its absence in well D-24 guided verification of the models within the structural–stratigraphic framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Drozd Arkadiusz & Topór Tomasz & Lis-Śledziona Anita & Sowiżdżał Krzysztof, 2025. "Machine Learning Approaches for Predicting Lithological and Petrophysical Parameters in Hydrocarbon Exploration: A Case Study from the Carpathian Foredeep," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-28, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4521-:d:1732881
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4521/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4521/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Fionn Murtagh & Pierre Legendre, 2014. "Ward’s Hierarchical Agglomerative Clustering Method: Which Algorithms Implement Ward’s Criterion?," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 31(3), pages 274-295, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maurizio Vichi & Carlo Cavicchia & Patrick J. F. Groenen, 2022. "Hierarchical Means Clustering," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 39(3), pages 553-577, November.
    2. Jiao Jieying & Hu Guanyu & Yan Jun, 2021. "A Bayesian marked spatial point processes model for basketball shot chart," Journal of Quantitative Analysis in Sports, De Gruyter, vol. 17(2), pages 77-90, June.
    3. Paulus, Michal & Kristoufek, Ladislav, 2015. "Worldwide clustering of the corruption perception," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 428(C), pages 351-358.
    4. Hyeri Choi & Min Jae Park, 2019. "Evaluating the Efficiency of Governmental Excellence for Social Progress: Focusing on Low- and Lower-Middle-Income Countries," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(1), pages 111-130, January.
    5. Maksym Polyakov & Morteza Chalak & Md. Sayed Iftekhar & Ram Pandit & Sorada Tapsuwan & Fan Zhang & Chunbo Ma, 2018. "Authorship, Collaboration, Topics, and Research Gaps in Environmental and Resource Economics 1991–2015," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 71(1), pages 217-239, September.
    6. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:3:p:934-948 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Giger, Markus & Mutea, Emily & Kiteme, Boniface & Eckert, Sandra & Anseeuw, Ward & Zaehringer, Julie G., 2020. "Large agricultural investments in Kenya’s Nanyuki Area: Inventory and analysis of business models," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    8. Walker, Nathan L. & Styles, David & Coughlan, Paul & Williams, A. Prysor, 2022. "Cross-sector sustainability benchmarking of major utilities in the United Kingdom," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    9. Pierre H. H. Schneeberger & Morgan Gueuning & Sophie Welsche & Eveline Hürlimann & Julian Dommann & Cécile Häberli & Jürg E. Frey & Somphou Sayasone & Jennifer Keiser, 2022. "Different gut microbial communities correlate with efficacy of albendazole-ivermectin against soil-transmitted helminthiases," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 13(1), pages 1-12, December.
    10. Abang Zainoren Abang Abdurahman & Syerina Azlin Md Nasir & Wan Fairos Wan Yaacob & Serah Jaya & Suhaili Mokhtar, 2021. "Spatio-Temporal Clustering of Sarawak Malaysia Total Protected Area Visitors," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-19, October.
    11. Ioana Birlan & Adriana AnaMaria Davidescu & Catalina-Elena Tita & Tamara Maria Nae, 2025. "Modeling Regional ESG Performance in the European Union: A Partial Least Squares Approach to Sustainable Economic Systems," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-42, July.
    12. Danxue Fan & Meiyue Li, 2025. "Coupling and Coordinated Development Analysis of Digital Economy, Economic Resilience, and Ecological Protection," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-25, May.
    13. Mulu Abraha Woldegiorgis & Janet E. Hiller & Wubegzier Mekonnen & Jahar Bhowmik, 2018. "Disparities in maternal health services in sub-Saharan Africa," International Journal of Public Health, Springer;Swiss School of Public Health (SSPH+), vol. 63(4), pages 525-535, May.
    14. Monika Stanny & Łukasz Komorowski & Andrzej Rosner, 2021. "The Socio-Economic Heterogeneity of Rural Areas: Towards a Rural Typology of Poland," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-23, August.
    15. Renato Amorim, 2015. "Feature Relevance in Ward’s Hierarchical Clustering Using the L p Norm," Journal of Classification, Springer;The Classification Society, vol. 32(1), pages 46-62, April.
    16. Anca Gabriela Ilie & Marinela Luminita Emanuela Zlatea & Cristina Negreanu & Dan Dumitriu & Alma Pentescu, 2023. "Reliance on Russian Federation Energy Imports and Renewable Energy in the European Union," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 25(64), pages 780-780, August.
    17. Luiza Ossowska & Dorota Janiszewska & Natalia Bartkowiak-Bakun & Grzegorz Kwiatkowski, 2020. "Energy Consumption Versus Greenhouse Gas Emissions in EU," European Research Studies Journal, European Research Studies Journal, vol. 0(3), pages 185-198.
    18. Lerato Lerato & Thomas Niesler, 2015. "Clustering Acoustic Segments Using Multi-Stage Agglomerative Hierarchical Clustering," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 10(10), pages 1-24, October.
    19. Jon Ellingsen & Vegard H. Larsen & Leif Anders Thorsrud, 2020. "News Media vs. FRED-MD for Macroeconomic Forecasting," CESifo Working Paper Series 8639, CESifo.
    20. Sokhna Dieng & Pierre Michel & Abdoulaye Guindo & Kankoe Sallah & El-Hadj Ba & Badara Cissé & Maria Patrizia Carrieri & Cheikh Sokhna & Paul Milligan & Jean Gaudart, 2020. "Application of Functional Data Analysis to Identify Patterns of Malaria Incidence, to Guide Targeted Control Strategies," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(11), pages 1-23, June.
    21. Jill F. Lundell & Brennan Bean & Jürgen Symanzik, 2023. "Let’s talk about the weather: a cluster-based approach to weather forecast accuracy," Computational Statistics, Springer, vol. 38(3), pages 1135-1155, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4521-:d:1732881. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.