IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i17p4492-d1731212.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigations on Solidification and Melting Processes of the Solar Salt Mixture in Evacuated and Non-Evacuated Receiver Tubes

Author

Listed:
  • Valeria Russo

    (ENEA Casaccia Research Centre, Via Anguillarese, 301, 00123 Rome, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Napoli

    (ENEA Casaccia Research Centre, Via Anguillarese, 301, 00123 Rome, Italy)

  • Francesco Rovense

    (ENEA Casaccia Research Centre, Via Anguillarese, 301, 00123 Rome, Italy)

  • Primo Di Ascenzi

    (ENEA Casaccia Research Centre, Via Anguillarese, 301, 00123 Rome, Italy)

  • Gianremo Giorgi

    (ENEA Casaccia Research Centre, Via Anguillarese, 301, 00123 Rome, Italy)

  • Luigi Mongibello

    (ENEA Portici Research Centre, P.le Enrico Fermi, 1, 80055 Portici, Italy)

  • Carmine Cancro

    (ENEA Portici Research Centre, P.le Enrico Fermi, 1, 80055 Portici, Italy)

  • Gabriele Ciniglio

    (ENEA Portici Research Centre, P.le Enrico Fermi, 1, 80055 Portici, Italy)

  • Walter Gaggioli

    (ENEA Casaccia Research Centre, Via Anguillarese, 301, 00123 Rome, Italy)

Abstract

Parabolic trough collector (PTC) plants that use solar salt as a heat transfer fluid face operational challenges due to the salt’s relatively high solidification temperature of around 240 °C, which can compromise reliability if solidification occurs within receiver tubes or piping. While electric tracing cables are typically used to heat piping, they cannot be installed on PTC receivers due to the presence of external glass covers. As an alternative, impedance heating can be employed, applying voltage directly to the steel receivers, which act as resistive heaters. This study presents experimental results on the phase-change behavior of solar salt within receivers, focusing on melting and solidification times. Tests were conducted using two dedicated receivers under vacuum and non-vacuum conditions. Under vacuum, complete melting was achieved at 4.5 V and 1.43 kW in 5.5 h, while solidification from 270 °C took about 4 h, progressing inward from the tube connections. For non-evacuated receivers, 7 V and 3.2 kW were needed for melting in 5.6 h, and solidification at 270 °C was completed in 1.45 h. These outcomes illustrate that non-evacuated tubes require nearly twice the power and have a 2.8-fold increase in heat loss rate, offering quantitative guidance for vacuum loss detection in PTC systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Valeria Russo & Giuseppe Napoli & Francesco Rovense & Primo Di Ascenzi & Gianremo Giorgi & Luigi Mongibello & Carmine Cancro & Gabriele Ciniglio & Walter Gaggioli, 2025. "Investigations on Solidification and Melting Processes of the Solar Salt Mixture in Evacuated and Non-Evacuated Receiver Tubes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-24, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4492-:d:1731212
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4492/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/17/4492/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Roberto Grena & Mattia Cagnoli & Roberto Zanino & Michela Lanchi, 2025. "Overcoming Power Limitations of Electric Heating in a Solar Salt Thermal Storage by Microwave Heating," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
    2. Cristina Prieto & Alfonso Rodríguez-Sánchez & F. Javier Ruiz-Cabañas & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2019. "Feasibility Study of Freeze Recovery Options in Parabolic Trough Collector Plants Working with Molten Salt as Heat Transfer Fluid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(12), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Valeria Russo & Giuseppe Petroni & Francesco Rovense & Mauro Giorgetti & Giuseppe Napoli & Gianremo Giorgi & Walter Gaggioli, 2025. "Experimental Testing Results on Critical Components for Molten Salt-Based CSP Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(1), pages 1-21, January.
    4. Lilliestam, Johan & Barradi, Touria & Caldés, Natalia & Gomez, Marta & Hanger, Susanne & Kern, Jürgen & Komendantova, Nadejda & Mehos, Mark & Hong, Wai Mun & Wang, Zhifeng & Patt, Anthony, 2018. "Policies to keep and expand the option of concentrating solar power for dispatchable renewable electricity," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 193-197.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ji, Junping & Tang, Hua & Jin, Peng, 2019. "Economic potential to develop concentrating solar power in China: A provincial assessment," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 1-1.
    2. Kareem Noureldin & Tobias Hirsch & Bijan Nouri & Zeyad Yasser & Robert Pitz-Paal, 2021. "Evaluating the Potential Benefit of Using Nowcasting Systems to Improve the Yield of Parabolic Trough Power Plants with Single-Phase HTF," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(3), pages 1-21, February.
    3. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2020. "Off-design performance of a supercritical CO2 Brayton cycle integrated with a solar power tower system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).
    4. Cristina Prieto & Sonia Fereres & Luisa F. Cabeza, 2020. "The Role of Innovation in Industry Product Deployment: Developing Thermal Energy Storage for Concentrated Solar Power," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-19, June.
    5. Navalho, Jorge E.P. & Pereira, José C.F., 2020. "A comprehensive and fully predictive discrete methodology for volumetric solar receivers: application to a functional parabolic dish solar collector system," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 267(C).
    6. Rangel, Richard & Arango-Manrique, Adriana & Corredor, Lesme & Sanjuan, Marco, 2024. "Assessment of Colombian renewable energy auctions policy: Enabler or barrier for concentrating solar power plants," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    7. Roberto Grena & Mattia Cagnoli & Roberto Zanino & Michela Lanchi, 2025. "Overcoming Power Limitations of Electric Heating in a Solar Salt Thermal Storage by Microwave Heating," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(8), pages 1-21, April.
    8. Damien Bazin & Nouri Chtourou & Amna Omri, 2019. "Risk management and policy implications for concentrating solar power technology investments in Tunisia," Post-Print hal-02061788, HAL.
    9. Sunghyun Yoo & Jihun Kim & Sungyeol Choi & Jeong Ik Lee, 2025. "Thermal Stability and Eutectic Point of Chloride-Based High-Temperature Molten Salt Energy Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-18, July.
    10. Mohammad Esmailzadeh & Siamak Noori & Alireza Aliahmadi & Hamidreza Nouralizadeh & Marcel Bogers, 2020. "A Functional Analysis of Technological Innovation Systems in Developing Countries: An Evaluation of Iran’s Photovoltaic Innovation System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Alhussein Albarbar & Abdullah Arar, 2019. "Performance Assessment and Improvement of Central Receivers Used for Solar Thermal Plants," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-27, August.
    12. Tan, Qinliang & Ding, Yihong & Zheng, Jin & Dai, Mei & Zhang, Yimei, 2021. "The effects of carbon emissions trading and renewable portfolio standards on the integrated wind–photovoltaic–thermal power-dispatching system: Real case studies in China," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    13. Ram, Shri & Ganesan, H. & Saini, Vishnu & Kumar, Abhinav, 2023. "Performance assessment of a parabolic trough solar collector using nanofluid and water based on direct absorption," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 11-22.
    14. Norambuena-Guzmán, Valentina & Palma-Behnke, Rodrigo & Hernández-Moris, Catalina & Cerda, Maria Teresa & Flores-Quiroz, Ángela, 2024. "Towards CSP technology modeling in power system expansion planning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    15. Yang, Jingze & Yang, Zhen & Duan, Yuanyuan, 2021. "Load matching and techno-economic analysis of CSP plant with S–CO2 Brayton cycle in CSP-PV-wind hybrid system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    16. Chang, Ruidong & Cao, Yuan & Lu, Yujie & Shabunko, Veronika, 2019. "Should BIPV technologies be empowered by innovation policy mix to facilitate energy transitions? - Revealing stakeholders' different perspectives using Q methodology," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 307-318.
    17. Guo, Hao & Xu, Hongyu & Xu, Cheng & Xin, Tuantuan, 2025. "Off-design performance analysis and comparison of a coal-based semi-closed supercritical CO2 cycle under different operational strategies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 315(C).
    18. Hahn Menacho, A.J. & Rodrigues, J.F.D. & Behrens, P., 2022. "A triple bottom line assessment of concentrated solar power generation in China and Europe 2020–2050," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:17:p:4492-:d:1731212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.