IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i16p4337-d1724544.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Environmental Evaluation Index of Carbon-Based Power Generation Formats Under the “Dual Carbon Goals”

Author

Listed:
  • Chaojie Li

    (Electric Power Research Institute of Guizhou Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550002, China)

  • Xiankui Wen

    (Electric Power Research Institute of Guizhou Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550002, China)

  • Ying Zhang

    (Electric Power Research Institute of Guizhou Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550002, China)

  • Ruyue Guo

    (Electric Power Research Institute of Guizhou Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550002, China)

  • Siran Peng

    (Electric Power Research Institute of Guizhou Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550002, China)

Abstract

As a major source of carbon emissions, the carbon-based power generation industry requires a scientifically robust environmental performance evaluation system to facilitate its green transition and sustainable development. Focusing on unique transition dynamics across four carbon-based power generation formats, this study compares environmental dimension indicators across typical ESG evaluation frameworks and proposes an innovative evaluation index model of environmental performance based on common metrics, with a particular emphasis on their contribution potential to the “Dual Carbon Goals”. The framework’s core innovation lies in its Dual Carbon-focused indicator system, which evaluates three critical indicators overlooked by mainstream ESG methodologies. It extends to include upstream/downstream processes, addressing gaps in current evaluation systems. The findings reveal that core environmental issues, such as climate change, pollution emissions, and resource utilization, exhibit broad commonality in ESG evaluations. Among the assessed indicators, carbon emission intensity carries the highest weight, underscoring its centrality in each power generation sector’s efforts to align with the Dual Carbon Goals. Furthermore, the analysis demonstrates that underground coal gasification combined cycle power generation has a relatively favorable environmental performance, ranking slightly below natural gas combined cycle but above shale gas combined cycle power generation. In contrast, traditional coal-fired power generation exhibits significantly poorer environmental outcomes, highlighting both the efficacy of technological upgrades in reducing emissions and the urgent need for transitioning away from conventional coal-based power.

Suggested Citation

  • Chaojie Li & Xiankui Wen & Ying Zhang & Ruyue Guo & Siran Peng, 2025. "Research on Environmental Evaluation Index of Carbon-Based Power Generation Formats Under the “Dual Carbon Goals”," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-17, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:16:p:4337-:d:1724544
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/16/4337/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/16/4337/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zuoming Liu & Changbo Qiu & Min Sun & Dongmin Zhang, 2022. "Environmental Performance Evaluation of Key Polluting Industries in China—Taking the Power Industry as an Example," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(12), pages 1-21, June.
    2. Wan, Liyang & Wang, Can & Cai, Wenjia, 2016. "Impacts on water consumption of power sector in major emitting economies under INDC and longer term mitigation scenarios: An input-output based hybrid approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 26-39.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Krarti, Moncef & Aldubyan, Mohammad, 2021. "Mitigation analysis of water consumption for power generation and air conditioning of residential buildings: Case study of Saudi Arabia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    2. Zhao, Laijun & Wang, Ke & Yi, Hongru & Cheng, Youfeng & Zhen, Juntao & Hu, Haisheng, 2024. "Carbon emission drivers of China's power sector and its transformation for global decarbonization contribution," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 376(PA).
    3. Zihao Li & Xihang Xie & Xinyue Yan & Tingting Bai & Dong Xu, 2022. "Impact of China’s Rural Land Marketization on Ecological Environment Quality Based on Remote Sensing," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(19), pages 1-21, October.
    4. Mu, Yaqian & Wang, Can & Cai, Wenjia, 2018. "The economic impact of China's INDC: Distinguishing the roles of the renewable energy quota and the carbon market," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2955-2966.
    5. Hagenaars, R.H. & Heijungs, R. & Tukker, A. & Wang, R., 2025. "Hybrid LCA for sustainable transitions: principles, applications, and prospects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    6. Hai Li & Hui Liu, 2023. "Climate Change, Farm Irrigation Facilities, and Agriculture Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-19, February.
    7. Yu, Biying & Dai, Ying & Fu, Jiahao & Qi, Jiahong & Li, Xia, 2025. "Industrial risks assessment for the large-scale development of electric arc furnace steelmaking technology," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 377(PC).
    8. Lu Lin & Yongqin David Chen, 2017. "Evaluation of Future Water Use for Electricity Generation under Different Energy Development Scenarios in China," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Wu, Di & Zhang, Yuqian & Liu, Bo & Wang, Keke & Wang, Zijing & Kang, Junjie, 2024. "Optimization of coal power phaseout pathways ensuring energy security: Evidence from Shandong, China's largest coal power province," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    10. Linghao Meng & Jusen Asuka, 2022. "Impacts of Energy Transition on Life Cycle Carbon Emission and Water Consumption in Japan’s Electric Sector," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-14, April.
    11. Raul Munoz Castillo & Kuishuang Feng & Klaus Hubacek & Laixiang Sun & Joaquim Guilhoto & Fernando Miralles-Wilhelm, 2017. "Uncovering the Green, Blue, and Grey Water Footprint and Virtual Water of Biofuel Production in Brazil: A Nexus Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-18, November.
    12. Wang, Saige & Fath, Brian & Chen, Bin, 2019. "Energy–water nexus under energy mix scenarios using input–output and ecological network analyses," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 827-839.
    13. Luu, Le Quyen & Gibon, Thomas & Cellura, Maurizio & Sanseverino, Eleonora Riva & Longo, Sonia, 2024. "Integrated hybrid multi-regional input-output for assessing life cycle air emissions of the Italian power system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 290(C).
    14. Srinivasan, Shweta & Kholod, Nazar & Chaturvedi, Vaibhav & Ghosh, Probal Pratap & Mathur, Ritu & Clarke, Leon & Evans, Meredydd & Hejazi, Mohamad & Kanudia, Amit & Koti, Poonam Nagar & Liu, Bo & Parik, 2018. "Water for electricity in India: A multi-model study of future challenges and linkages to climate change mitigation," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 210(C), pages 673-684.
    15. Distefano, Tiziano & Kelly, Scott, 2017. "Are we in deep water? Water scarcity and its limits to economic growth," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 130-147.
    16. Yang, Yafei & Cui, Qi & Wang, Hui, 2024. "Assessing the socioeconomic and environmental impacts of China's power sector changes in 2010–2020," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 364(C).
    17. Handayani, Kamia & Krozer, Yoram & Filatova, Tatiana, 2017. "Trade-offs between electrification and climate change mitigation: An analysis of the Java-Bali power system in Indonesia," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 208(C), pages 1020-1037.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:16:p:4337-:d:1724544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.