Author
Listed:
- Chaojie Li
(Electric Power Research Institute of Guizhou Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550002, China)
- Xiankui Wen
(Electric Power Research Institute of Guizhou Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550002, China)
- Ying Zhang
(Electric Power Research Institute of Guizhou Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550002, China)
- Ruyue Guo
(Electric Power Research Institute of Guizhou Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550002, China)
- Siran Peng
(Electric Power Research Institute of Guizhou Power Grid Co., Ltd., Guiyang 550002, China)
Abstract
As a major source of carbon emissions, the carbon-based power generation industry requires a scientifically robust environmental performance evaluation system to facilitate its green transition and sustainable development. Focusing on unique transition dynamics across four carbon-based power generation formats, this study compares environmental dimension indicators across typical ESG evaluation frameworks and proposes an innovative evaluation index model of environmental performance based on common metrics, with a particular emphasis on their contribution potential to the “Dual Carbon Goals”. The framework’s core innovation lies in its Dual Carbon-focused indicator system, which evaluates three critical indicators overlooked by mainstream ESG methodologies. It extends to include upstream/downstream processes, addressing gaps in current evaluation systems. The findings reveal that core environmental issues, such as climate change, pollution emissions, and resource utilization, exhibit broad commonality in ESG evaluations. Among the assessed indicators, carbon emission intensity carries the highest weight, underscoring its centrality in each power generation sector’s efforts to align with the Dual Carbon Goals. Furthermore, the analysis demonstrates that underground coal gasification combined cycle power generation has a relatively favorable environmental performance, ranking slightly below natural gas combined cycle but above shale gas combined cycle power generation. In contrast, traditional coal-fired power generation exhibits significantly poorer environmental outcomes, highlighting both the efficacy of technological upgrades in reducing emissions and the urgent need for transitioning away from conventional coal-based power.
Suggested Citation
Chaojie Li & Xiankui Wen & Ying Zhang & Ruyue Guo & Siran Peng, 2025.
"Research on Environmental Evaluation Index of Carbon-Based Power Generation Formats Under the “Dual Carbon Goals”,"
Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(16), pages 1-17, August.
Handle:
RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:16:p:4337-:d:1724544
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:16:p:4337-:d:1724544. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.