IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i15p4093-d1715920.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Cascade Processing of Agricultural, Forest, and Marine Waste Biomass for Sustainable Production of Food, Feed, Biopolymers, and Bioenergy

Author

Listed:
  • Swarnima Agnihotri

    (Swedish Centre for Resource Recovery, University of Borås, 501 90 Borås, Sweden)

  • Ellinor B. Heggset

    (RISE PFI, Høgskoleringen 6b, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

  • Juliana Aristéia de Lima

    (Department of Polymer, Fiber and Composite, RISE Research Institutes of Sweden, 504 62 Borås, Sweden)

  • Ilona Sárvári Horváth

    (Swedish Centre for Resource Recovery, University of Borås, 501 90 Borås, Sweden)

  • Mihaela Tanase-Opedal

    (RISE PFI, Høgskoleringen 6b, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

An increasing global population, rising energy demands, and the shift toward a circular bioeconomy are driving the need for more resource-efficient waste management. The increase in the world population—now exceeding 8 billion as of 2024—results in an increased need for alternative proteins, both human and feed grade proteins, as well as for biopolymers and bioenergy. As such, agricultural, forest, and marine waste biomass represent a valuable feedstock for production of food and feed ingredients, biopolymers, and bioenergy. However, the lack of integrated and efficient valorization strategies for these diverse biomass sources remains a major challenge. This literature review aims to give a systematic approach on the recent research status of agricultural, forest, and marine waste biomass valorization, focusing on cascade processing (a sequential combination of processes such as pretreatment, extraction, and conversion methods). Potential products will be identified that create the most economic value over multiple lifetimes, to maximize resource efficiency. It highlights the challenges associated with cascade processing of waste biomass and proposes technological synergies for waste biomass valorization. Moreover, this review will provide a comprehensive understanding of the potential of waste biomass valorization in the context of sustainable and circular bioeconomy.

Suggested Citation

  • Swarnima Agnihotri & Ellinor B. Heggset & Juliana Aristéia de Lima & Ilona Sárvári Horváth & Mihaela Tanase-Opedal, 2025. "Cascade Processing of Agricultural, Forest, and Marine Waste Biomass for Sustainable Production of Food, Feed, Biopolymers, and Bioenergy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(15), pages 1-25, August.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:15:p:4093-:d:1715920
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/15/4093/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/15/4093/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Katherine G. Johnston & Abdelfatah Abomohra & Christopher E. French & Abdelrahman S. Zaky, 2023. "Recent Advances in Seaweed Biorefineries and Assessment of Their Potential for Carbon Capture and Storage," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-32, September.
    2. Jain, Sanyam & Kumar, Shushil, 2024. "A comprehensive review of bioethanol production from diverse feedstocks: Current advancements and economic perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 296(C).
    3. Gayathri Priya Iragavarapu & Syed Shahed Imam & Omprakash Sarkar & Srinivasula Venkata Mohan & Young-Cheol Chang & Motakatla Venkateswar Reddy & Sang-Hyoun Kim & Naresh Kumar Amradi, 2023. "Bioprocessing of Waste for Renewable Chemicals and Fuels to Promote Bioeconomy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(9), pages 1-24, May.
    4. Demirbas, Ayhan, 2011. "Competitive liquid biofuels from biomass," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(1), pages 17-28, January.
    5. Wojciech Czekała & Tomasz Jasiński & Mieczysław Grzelak & Kamil Witaszek & Jacek Dach, 2022. "Biogas Plant Operation: Digestate as the Valuable Product," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(21), pages 1-11, November.
    6. Alexandra Gottinger & Luana Ladu & Rainer Quitzow, 2020. "Studying the Transition towards a Circular Bioeconomy—A Systematic Literature Review on Transition Studies and Existing Barriers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-25, October.
    7. Jiaao Zhu & Yun Guo & Na Chen & Baoming Chen, 2024. "A Review of the Efficient and Thermal Utilization of Biomass Waste," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(21), pages 1-30, October.
    8. Maxwel Monção & Anthony Ike Anukam & Kateřina Hrůzová & Ulrika Rova & Paul Christakopoulos & Leonidas Matsakas, 2024. "A Parametric Study of the Organosolv Fractionation of Norway Spruce Sawdust," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(13), pages 1-14, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bharathiraja, B. & Jayamuthunagai, J. & Sudharsanaa, T. & Bharghavi, A. & Praveenkumar, R. & Chakravarthy, M. & Yuvaraj, D., 2017. "Biobutanol – An impending biofuel for future: A review on upstream and downstream processing tecniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 68(P1), pages 788-807.
    2. Christina-Ioanna Papadopoulou & Stavros Kalogiannidis & Efstratios Loizou & Fotios Chatzitheodoridis, 2025. "Navigating the Bioeconomy: Using Delphi-SWOT to Build Robust Strategies for Sustainable Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-22, May.
    3. Vasaki E, Madhu & Karri, Rama Rao & Ravindran, Gobinath & Paramasivan, Balasubramanian, 2021. "Predictive capability evaluation and optimization of sustainable biodiesel production from oleaginous biomass grown on pulp and paper industrial wastewater," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 204-215.
    4. Wang, Zhi & Liu, Hui & Long, Yan & Wang, Jianxin & He, Xin, 2015. "Comparative study on alcohols–gasoline and gasoline–alcohols dual-fuel spark ignition (DFSI) combustion for high load extension and high fuel efficiency," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 395-405.
    5. Jin, Wenxiang & Chen, Ling & Hu, Meng & Sun, Dan & Li, Ao & Li, Ying & Hu, Zhen & Zhou, Shiguang & Tu, Yuanyuan & Xia, Tao & Wang, Yanting & Xie, Guosheng & Li, Yanbin & Bai, Baowei & Peng, Liangcai, 2016. "Tween-80 is effective for enhancing steam-exploded biomass enzymatic saccharification and ethanol production by specifically lessening cellulase absorption with lignin in common reed," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 82-90.
    6. Li, Yuping & Huang, Xiaoming & Zhang, Qian & Chen, Lungang & Zhang, Xinghua & Wang, Tiejun & Ma, Longlong, 2015. "Hydrogenation and hydrodeoxygenation of difurfurylidene acetone to liquid alkanes over Raney Ni and the supported Pt catalysts," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 990-998.
    7. Magdeldin, Mohamed & Kohl, Thomas & Järvinen, Mika, 2017. "Techno-economic assessment of the by-products contribution from non-catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of lignocellulose residues," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 679-695.
    8. Jiheon Jun & Yi-Feng Su & James R. Keiser & John E. Wade & Michael D. Kass & Jack R. Ferrell & Earl Christensen & Mariefel V. Olarte & Dino Sulejmanovic, 2022. "Corrosion Compatibility of Stainless Steels and Nickel in Pyrolysis Biomass-Derived Oil at Elevated Storage Temperatures," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Huang, Y. & McIlveen-Wright, D.R. & Rezvani, S. & Huang, M.J. & Wang, Y.D. & Roskilly, A.P. & Hewitt, N.J., 2013. "Comparative techno-economic analysis of biomass fuelled combined heat and power for commercial buildings," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 518-525.
    10. Ochoa, Aitor & Vicente, Héctor & Sierra, Irene & Arandes, José M. & Castaño, Pedro, 2020. "Implications of feeding or cofeeding bio-oil in the fluid catalytic cracker (FCC) in terms of regeneration kinetics and energy balance," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
    11. Tan, Raymond R. & Aviso, Kathleen B. & Barilea, Ivan U. & Culaba, Alvin B. & Cruz, Jose B., 2012. "A fuzzy multi-regional input–output optimization model for biomass production and trade under resource and footprint constraints," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 90(1), pages 154-160.
    12. Talebian-Kiakalaieh, Amin & Amin, Nor Aishah Saidina & Mazaheri, Hossein, 2013. "A review on novel processes of biodiesel production from waste cooking oil," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 104(C), pages 683-710.
    13. Kasivisvanathan, Harresh & Barilea, Ivan Dale U. & Ng, Denny K.S. & Tan, Raymond R., 2013. "Optimal operational adjustment in multi-functional energy systems in response to process inoperability," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 492-500.
    14. Akroum-Amrouche, Dahbia & Abdi, Nadia & Lounici, Hakim & Mameri, Nabil, 2011. "Effect of physico-chemical parameters on biohydrogen production and growth characteristics by batch culture of Rhodobacter sphaeroides CIP 60.6," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 88(6), pages 2130-2135, June.
    15. Makarfi Isa, Yusuf & Ganda, Elvis Tinashe, 2018. "Bio-oil as a potential source of petroleum range fuels," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 69-75.
    16. McCarty, Tanner & Sesmero, Juan, 2014. "Uncertainty, Irreversibility, and Investment in Second-Generation Biofuels," 2014 Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2014, Minneapolis, Minnesota 179201, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    17. Xu, Donghai & Lin, Guike & Guo, Shuwei & Wang, Shuzhong & Guo, Yang & Jing, Zefeng, 2018. "Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of algae and upgrading of biocrude: A critical review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 103-118.
    18. Rizwan, Muhammad & Lee, Jay H. & Gani, Rafiqul, 2015. "Optimal design of microalgae-based biorefinery: Economics, opportunities and challenges," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 69-79.
    19. Artur Wodołażski, 2025. "Coupled CFD-DEM Numerical Simulation of Hydrothermal Liquefaction (HTL) of Sludge Flocs to Biocrude Oil in a Continuous Stirred Tank Reactor (CSTR) in a Scale-Up Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(17), pages 1-26, August.
    20. Maity, Sunil K., 2015. "Opportunities, recent trends and challenges of integrated biorefinery: Part II," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 1446-1466.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:15:p:4093-:d:1715920. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.