IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i13p3422-d1690396.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of Humidity on the Energy and CO 2 Separation Characteristics of Membranes in Direct Air Capture Technology

Author

Listed:
  • Kamil Niesporek

    (Department of Power Engineering and Turbomachinery, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Grzegorz Wiciak

    (Department of Power Engineering and Turbomachinery, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Janusz Kotowicz

    (Department of Power Engineering and Turbomachinery, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Oliwia Baszczeńska

    (Department of Power Engineering and Turbomachinery, Faculty of Energy and Environmental Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

Abstract

Membrane-based direct air capture of CO 2 (m-DAC) is a promising solution for atmospheric decarbonization. Despite growing interest, the impact of relative air humidity on the performance of m-DAC systems is often neglected in the literature. This study presents detailed parametric analyses that take into account humidity variability and several hypothetical scenarios regarding membrane selectivity toward water vapor. Specifically, cases were considered where the permeance of H 2 O relative to CO 2 was assumed to be 0.5, 2, and 5 times higher, which allowed for a systematic assessment of the impact of relative humidity on process performance. The calculations were carried out both for membranes with assumed separation parameters and for the PolyActive TM membrane, enabling a realistic evaluation of the influence of atmospheric conditions on the process. The results show that an increase in humidity in the analyzed range from 0 to 80% can lead to a rise in the energy intensity of the process by up to approximately 34%, and an increase in total power demand by around 29%. As humidity increases, key process parameters such as CO 2 purity in the permeate and recovery rate decrease. The water vapor content in the permeate in a single-stage membrane separation process can reach up to 60%. It is recommended to use gas drying systems and to develop membranes with low H 2 O permeance in order to reduce the energy cost of the process. The potential location of m-DAC systems should preferably be in regions with low air humidity. The study highlights the necessity of considering local climate conditions and the need for further research on membrane selectivity.

Suggested Citation

  • Kamil Niesporek & Grzegorz Wiciak & Janusz Kotowicz & Oliwia Baszczeńska, 2025. "Effect of Humidity on the Energy and CO 2 Separation Characteristics of Membranes in Direct Air Capture Technology," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-19, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3422-:d:1690396
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3422/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3422/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Bui, Mai & Fajardy, Mathilde & Mac Dowell, Niall, 2017. "Bio-Energy with CCS (BECCS) performance evaluation: Efficiency enhancement and emissions reduction," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 289-302.
    2. Jason Boerst & Ivonne Pena Cabra & Smriti Sharma & Connie Zaremsky & Arun K. S. Iyengar, 2024. "Strategic Siting of Direct Air Capture Facilities in the United States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-30, July.
    3. An, Keju & Farooqui, Azharuddin & McCoy, Sean T., 2022. "The impact of climate on solvent-based direct air capture systems," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 325(C).
    4. Remiorz, Leszek & Wiciak, Grzegorz & Grzywnowicz, Krzysztof, 2019. "Novel concept of supporting the membrane separation of CO2 in power plants by thermoacoustic dehumidification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    5. Janusz Kotowicz & Kamil Niesporek & Oliwia Baszczeńska, 2025. "Advancements and Challenges in Direct Air Capture Technologies: Energy Intensity, Novel Methods, Economics, and Location Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, January.
    6. Takeshi Tsuji & Masao Sorai & Masashige Shiga & Shigenori Fujikawa & Toyoki Kunitake, 2021. "Geological storage of CO2–N2–O2 mixtures produced by membrane‐based direct air capture (DAC)," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(4), pages 610-618, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Janusz Kotowicz & Kamil Niesporek & Oliwia Baszczeńska, 2025. "Advancements and Challenges in Direct Air Capture Technologies: Energy Intensity, Novel Methods, Economics, and Location Strategies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(3), pages 1-21, January.
    2. Wang, Qian & Du, Caiyi & Zhang, Xueguang, 2024. "Direct air capture capacity configuration and cost allocation based on sharing mechanism," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 374(C).
    3. Wil Burns & Simon Nicholson, 2017. "Bioenergy and carbon capture with storage (BECCS): the prospects and challenges of an emerging climate policy response," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 7(4), pages 527-534, December.
    4. Li, Wei & Wang, Ting & Lu, Can, 2023. "Pathways to net-zero emissions from China's transportation industry: Considering alternative fuels," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 283(C).
    5. Saharudin, Djasmine Mastisya & Jeswani, Harish Kumar & Azapagic, Adisa, 2023. "Bioenergy with carbon capture and storage (BECSS): Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of electricity generated from palm oil wastes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 349(C).
    6. Rongrong Zhai & Hongtao Liu & Hao Wu & Hai Yu & Yongping Yang, 2018. "Analysis of Integration of MEA-Based CO 2 Capture and Solar Energy System for Coal-Based Power Plants Based on Thermo-Economic Structural Theory," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(5), pages 1-30, May.
    7. Wu, Zitao & Zhai, Haibo, 2021. "Consumptive life cycle water use of biomass-to-power plants with carbon capture and sequestration," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 303(C).
    8. Muhammad Ridhuan Tony Lim Abdullah & Saedah Siraj & Zulkipli Ghazali, 2021. "An ISM Approach for Managing Critical Stakeholder Issues Regarding Carbon Capture and Storage (CCS) Deployment in Developing Asian Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    9. Dikhanbaev, Bayandy & Dikhanbaev, Arystan & Koshumbayev, Marat & Ybray, Sultan & Mergalimova, Almagul & Georgiev, Aleksandar, 2024. "On the issue of neutralizing carbon dioxide at processing coal in boilers of thermal power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 295(C).
    10. Zappa, William & Junginger, Martin & van den Broek, Machteld, 2021. "Can liberalised electricity markets support decarbonised portfolios in line with the Paris Agreement? A case study of Central Western Europe," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C).
    11. Sammarchi, Sergio & Li, Jia & Izikowitz, David & Yang, Qiang & Xu, Dong, 2022. "China’s coal power decarbonization via CO2 capture and storage and biomass co-firing: A LCA case study in Inner Mongolia," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(PA).
    12. Vassilis Stavrakas & Niki-Artemis Spyridaki & Alexandros Flamos, 2018. "Striving towards the Deployment of Bio-Energy with Carbon Capture and Storage (BECCS): A Review of Research Priorities and Assessment Needs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-27, June.
    13. Amiri-Pebdani, Sima & Alinaghian, Mahdi & Khosroshahi, Hossein, 2023. "Pricing in competitive energy supply chains considering government interventions to support CCS under cap-and-trade regulations: A game-theoretic approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Ma, Chunyan & Wang, Nan & Chen, Yifeng & Khokarale, Santosh Govind & Bui, Thai Q. & Weiland, Fredrik & Lestander, Torbjörn A. & Rudolfsson, Magnus & Mikkola, Jyri-Pekka & Ji, Xiaoyan, 2020. "Towards negative carbon emissions: Carbon capture in bio-syngas from gasification by aqueous pentaethylenehexamine," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    15. Yang, Bo & Wei, Yi-Ming & Hou, Yunbing & Li, Hui & Wang, Pengtao, 2019. "Life cycle environmental impact assessment of fuel mix-based biomass co-firing plants with CO2 capture and storage," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 252(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Tsupari, Eemeli & Arponen, Timo & Hankalin, Ville & Kärki, Janne & Kouri, Sampo, 2017. "Feasibility comparison of bioenergy and CO2 capture and storage in a large combined heat, power and cooling system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 1040-1051.
    17. Yang, Lihua & Wu, Xiao, 2024. "Net-zero carbon configuration approach for direct air carbon capture based integrated energy system considering dynamic characteristics of CO2 adsorption and desorption," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    18. Bello, Sara & Galán-Martín, Ángel & Feijoo, Gumersindo & Moreira, Maria Teresa & Guillén-Gosálbez, Gonzalo, 2020. "BECCS based on bioethanol from wood residues: Potential towards a carbon-negative transport and side-effects," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    19. Jason Boerst & Ivonne Pena Cabra & Smriti Sharma & Connie Zaremsky & Arun K. S. Iyengar, 2024. "Strategic Siting of Direct Air Capture Facilities in the United States," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-30, July.
    20. Paweł Gładysz & Magdalena Strojny & Łukasz Bartela & Maciej Hacaga & Thomas Froehlich, 2022. "Merging Climate Action with Energy Security through CCS—A Multi-Disciplinary Framework for Assessment," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-28, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3422-:d:1690396. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.