IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i13p3388-d1689050.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Suitability Evaluation of Site-Level CO 2 Geo-Storage in Saline Aquifers of Ying–Qiong Basin, South China Sea

Author

Listed:
  • Jin Liao

    (Hainan Branch of CNOOC Limited, Haikou 570100, China)

  • Cai Li

    (Hainan Branch of CNOOC Limited, Haikou 570100, China)

  • Qihui Yang

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Aixia Sun

    (Hainan Branch of CNOOC Limited, Haikou 570100, China)

  • Guangze Song

    (Hainan Branch of CNOOC Limited, Haikou 570100, China)

  • Joaquin Couchot

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Aohan Jin

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

  • Quanrong Wang

    (School of Environmental Studies, China University of Geosciences, Wuhan 430074, China)

Abstract

CO 2 geo-storage is a promising approach in reducing greenhouse gas emissions and controlling global temperature rise. Although numerous studies have reported that offshore saline aquifers have greater storage potential and safety, current suitability evaluation models for CO 2 geo-storage primarily focus on onshore saline aquifers, and site-level evaluations for offshore CO 2 geo-storage remain unreported. In this study, we propose a framework to evaluate the site-level offshore CO 2 geo-storage suitability with a multi-tiered indicator system, which considers three types of factors: engineering geology, storage potential, and socio-economy. Compared to the onshore CO 2 geo-storage suitability evaluation models, the proposed indicator system considers the unique conditions of offshore CO 2 geo-storage, including water depth, offshore distance, and distance from drilling platforms. The Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation (FCE) methods were integrated and applied to the analysis of the Ying–Qiong Basin, South China Sea. The results indicated that the average suitability score in the Yinggehai Basin (0.762) was higher than that in the Qiongdongnan Basin (0.691). This difference was attributed to more extensive fault development in the Qiongdongnan Basin, suggesting that the Yinggehai Basin is more suitable for CO 2 geo-storage. In addition, the DF-I reservoir in the Yinggehai Basin and the BD-A reservoir in the Qiongdongnan Basin were selected as the optimal CO 2 geo-storage targets for the two sub-basins, with storage potentials of 1.09 × 10 8 t and 2.40 × 10 7 t, respectively. This study advances the methodology for assessing site-level potential of CO 2 geo-storage in offshore saline aquifers and provides valuable insights for engineering applications and decision-making in future CO 2 geo-storage projects in the Ying–Qiong Basin.

Suggested Citation

  • Jin Liao & Cai Li & Qihui Yang & Aixia Sun & Guangze Song & Joaquin Couchot & Aohan Jin & Quanrong Wang, 2025. "Suitability Evaluation of Site-Level CO 2 Geo-Storage in Saline Aquifers of Ying–Qiong Basin, South China Sea," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(13), pages 1-17, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3388-:d:1689050
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3388/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/13/3388/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:13:p:3388-:d:1689050. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.