IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i12p3098-d1677459.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lignite in Polish State Policies as a Regulatory Instrument

Author

Listed:
  • Hubert Schwarz

    (Department of Mining, Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-421 Wroclaw, Poland
    Amadeus Legal Firm, 54-611 Wrocław, Poland)

  • Zbigniew Kasztelewicz

    (Faculty of Civil Engineering and Resources Management, AGH University of Krakow, 30-059 Krakow, Poland)

  • Anna Nowak-Szpak

    (Department of Mining, Faculty of Geoengineering, Mining and Geology, Wrocław University of Science and Technology, 50-421 Wroclaw, Poland)

Abstract

Poland is a country with significant lignite resources. Prospecting for and exploring lignite deposits, as well as lignite extraction, requires prior acquisition of an appropriate concession. As concessions serve as instruments for regulating economic activity—and thereby constitute a form of permissible restriction on such activity under the Polish Constitution—the legal provisions governing them must be enacted by statute. This article analyzes the role of state policies relating to lignite extraction and its use in electricity generation, and examines the concession procedure as a regulatory instrument, with a particular focus on one specific ground for refusing to grant a concession: inconsistency with the state’s raw material interest. The main research question addresses whether the incorporation of the state’s raw material interest as grounds for refusal complies with constitutional standards and whether policy documents—specifically the State Raw Materials Policy and the State Energy Policy—can effectively guide its interpretation. The analysis concludes that, while the constitutional framework permits such a ground for refusal, current policy documents require updates and greater specificity to ensure legal certainty and consistency in administrative practices.

Suggested Citation

  • Hubert Schwarz & Zbigniew Kasztelewicz & Anna Nowak-Szpak, 2025. "Lignite in Polish State Policies as a Regulatory Instrument," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(12), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:12:p:3098-:d:1677459
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/12/3098/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/12/3098/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kubik, M.L. & Coker, P.J. & Hunt, C., 2012. "The role of conventional generation in managing variability," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 253-261.
    2. Janusz Gierszewski & Łukasz Młynarkiewicz & Tomasz R. Nowacki & Jacek Dworzecki, 2021. "Nuclear Power in Poland’s Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(12), pages 1-25, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Antti Alahäivälä & Juha Kiviluoma & Jyrki Leino & Matti Lehtonen, 2017. "System-Level Value of a Gas Engine Power Plant in Electricity and Reserve Production," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-13, July.
    2. Olga Pilipczuk, 2021. "Determinants of Managerial Competences Transformation in the Polish Energy Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(20), pages 1-27, October.
    3. Boßmann, Tobias & Eser, Eike Johannes, 2016. "Model-based assessment of demand-response measures—A comprehensive literature review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 1637-1656.
    4. Malhotra, Abhishek & Battke, Benedikt & Beuse, Martin & Stephan, Annegret & Schmidt, Tobias, 2016. "Use cases for stationary battery technologies: A review of the literature and existing projects," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 705-721.
    5. Mikkola, Jani & Lund, Peter D., 2016. "Modeling flexibility and optimal use of existing power plants with large-scale variable renewable power schemes," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 112(C), pages 364-375.
    6. Donato Morea & Mohamad El Mehtedi & Pasquale Buonadonna, 2023. "Energy Context: Analysis of Selected Studies and Future Research Developments," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(3), pages 1-6, February.
    7. Fell, Harrison & Kaffine, Daniel T., 2014. "A one-two punch: Joint eects of natural gas abundance and renewables on coal-red power plants," CEnREP Working Papers 340063, North Carolina State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
    8. Ozan Korkmaz & Bihrat Önöz, 2022. "Modelling the Potential Impacts of Nuclear Energy and Renewables in the Turkish Energy System," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(4), pages 1-25, February.
    9. Harrison Fell & Daniel T. Kaffine, 2014. "A one-two punch: Joint effects of natural gas abundance and renewables on coal-fired power plants," Working Papers 2014-10, Colorado School of Mines, Division of Economics and Business.
    10. Carapellucci, Roberto & Giordano, Lorena & Vaccarelli, Maura, 2017. "Application of an amine-based CO2 capture system in retrofitting combined gas-steam power plants," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 808-826.
    11. Urzúa, I.A. & Olmedo, J.C. & Sauma, E.E., 2016. "Impact of intermittent non-conventional renewable generation in the costs of the Chilean main power system," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 810-821.
    12. Sylwia Mrozowska & Jan A. Wendt & Krzysztof Tomaszewski, 2021. "The Challenges of Poland’s Energy Transition," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-22, December.
    13. Ding, Yi & Shao, Changzheng & Yan, Jinyue & Song, Yonghua & Zhang, Chi & Guo, Chuangxin, 2018. "Economical flexibility options for integrating fluctuating wind energy in power systems: The case of China," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 228(C), pages 426-436.
    14. Higgins, P. & Foley, A.M. & Douglas, R. & Li, K., 2014. "Impact of offshore wind power forecast error in a carbon constraint electricity market," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 187-197.
    15. Helms, Thorsten & Loock, Moritz & Bohnsack, René, 2016. "Timing-based business models for flexibility creation in the electric power sector," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 92(C), pages 348-358.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:12:p:3098-:d:1677459. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.