IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i11p2870-d1668626.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal Bidding Strategies for the Participation of Aggregators in Energy Flexibility Markets

Author

Listed:
  • Gian Giuseppe Soma

    (Consorzio Multi Ente per la Promozione e L’adozione di Tecnologie di Calcolo Avanzato (COMETA), 95123 Catania, Italy)

  • Giuseppe Marco Tina

    (Department of Electrical Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy)

  • Stefania Conti

    (Department of Electrical Electronic and Computer Engineering, University of Catania, 95125 Catania, Italy)

Abstract

The increasing adoption of Renewable Energy Sources (RESs), due to international energy policies mainly related to the decarbonization of electricity production, raises several operating issues for power systems, which need “flexibility” in order to guarantee reliable and secure operation. RESs can be considered examples of Distributed Energy Resources (DERs), which are typically electric power generators connected to distribution networks, including photovoltaic and wind systems, fuel cells, micro-turbines, etc., as well as energy storage systems. In this case, improved operation of power systems can be achieved through coordinated control of groups of DERs by “aggregators”, who also offer a “flexibility service” to power systems that need to be appropriately remunerated according to market rules. The implementation of the aggregator function requires the development of tools to optimally operate, control, and dispatch the DERs to define their overall flexibility as a “market product” in the form of bids. The contribution of the present paper in this field is to propose a new optimization strategy for flexibility bidding to maximize the profit of the aggregator in flexibility markets. The proposed optimal scheduling procedure accounts for important practical and technical aspects related to the DERs’ operation and their flexibility estimation. A case study is also presented and discussed to demonstrate the validity of the method; the results clearly highlight the efficacy of the proposed approach, showing a profit increase of 10% in comparison with the base case without the use of the proposed methodology. It is evident that quantitatively more significant results can be obtained when larger aggregations (more participants) are considered.

Suggested Citation

  • Gian Giuseppe Soma & Giuseppe Marco Tina & Stefania Conti, 2025. "Optimal Bidding Strategies for the Participation of Aggregators in Energy Flexibility Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:11:p:2870-:d:1668626
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2870/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2870/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hatziargyriou, Nikos D. & Asimakopoulou, Georgia E., 2020. "DER integration through a monopoly DER aggregator," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    2. Lu, Xin & Qiu, Jing & Zhang, Cuo & Lei, Gang & Zhu, Jianguo, 2024. "Seizing unconventional arbitrage opportunities in virtual power plants: A profitable and flexible recruitment approach," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 358(C).
    3. Cherrelle Eid & Paul Codani & Yannick Perez & Javier Reneses & Rudi Hakvoort, 2016. "Managing electric flexibility from Distributed Energy Resources: A review of incentives for market design," Post-Print hal-01792419, HAL.
    4. Ottesen, Stig Ødegaard & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Fleten, Stein-Erik, 2018. "Multi market bidding strategies for demand side flexibility aggregators in electricity markets," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 120-134.
    5. Jin, Xiaolong & Wu, Qiuwei & Jia, Hongjie, 2020. "Local flexibility markets: Literature review on concepts, models and clearing methods," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 261(C).
    6. Eid, Cherrelle & Codani, Paul & Perez, Yannick & Reneses, Javier & Hakvoort, Rudi, 2016. "Managing electric flexibility from Distributed Energy Resources: A review of incentives for market design," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 64(C), pages 237-247.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Karim L. Anaya & Michael G. Pollitt, 2021. "How to Procure Flexibility Services within the Electricity Distribution System: Lessons from an International Review of Innovation Projects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-26, July.
    2. Guray Kara & Asgeir Tomasgard & Hossein Farahmand, 2021. "Characterization of flexible electricity in power and energy markets," Papers 2109.03000, arXiv.org.
    3. Kara, Güray & Pisciella, Paolo & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Farahmand, Hossein & Crespo del Granado, Pedro, 2022. "Stochastic local flexibility market design, bidding, and dispatch for distribution grid operations," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    4. Kara, Güray & Tomasgard, Asgeir & Farahmand, Hossein, 2022. "Characterizing flexibility in power markets and systems," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 75(C).
    5. Ajla Mehinovic & Matej Zajc & Nermin Suljanovic, 2023. "Interpretation and Quantification of the Flexibility Sources Location on the Flexibility Service in the Distribution Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(2), pages 1-18, January.
    6. Tsaousoglou, Georgios & Giraldo, Juan S. & Paterakis, Nikolaos G., 2022. "Market Mechanisms for Local Electricity Markets: A review of models, solution concepts and algorithmic techniques," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    7. Gržanić, M. & Capuder, T. & Zhang, N. & Huang, W., 2022. "Prosumers as active market participants: A systematic review of evolution of opportunities, models and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    8. Aikaterini Forouli & Emmanouil A. Bakirtzis & Georgios Papazoglou & Konstantinos Oureilidis & Vasileios Gkountis & Luisa Candido & Eloi Delgado Ferrer & Pandelis Biskas, 2021. "Assessment of Demand Side Flexibility in European Electricity Markets: A Country Level Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-23, April.
    9. Andoni, Merlinda & Robu, Valentin & Flynn, David & Abram, Simone & Geach, Dale & Jenkins, David & McCallum, Peter & Peacock, Andrew, 2019. "Blockchain technology in the energy sector: A systematic review of challenges and opportunities," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 143-174.
    10. Rancilio, G. & Rossi, A. & Falabretti, D. & Galliani, A. & Merlo, M., 2022. "Ancillary services markets in europe: Evolution and regulatory trade-offs," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    11. Cherrelle Eid & Rudi Hakvoort & Martin de Jong, 2016. "Global trends in the political economy of smart grids: A tailored perspective on 'smart' for grids in transition," WIDER Working Paper Series 022, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    12. Konstantinos Kotsalos & Ismael Miranda & Nuno Silva & Helder Leite, 2019. "A Horizon Optimization Control Framework for the Coordinated Operation of Multiple Distributed Energy Resources in Low Voltage Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(6), pages 1-27, March.
    13. Pearson, Simon & Wellnitz, Sonja & Crespo del Granado, Pedro & Hashemipour, Naser, 2022. "The value of TSO-DSO coordination in re-dispatch with flexible decentralized energy sources: Insights for Germany in 2030," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 326(C).
    14. Pol Olivella-Rosell & Pau Lloret-Gallego & Íngrid Munné-Collado & Roberto Villafafila-Robles & Andreas Sumper & Stig Ødegaard Ottessen & Jayaprakash Rajasekharan & Bernt A. Bremdal, 2018. "Local Flexibility Market Design for Aggregators Providing Multiple Flexibility Services at Distribution Network Level," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-19, April.
    15. Patrick Sunday Onen & Geev Mokryani & Rana H. A. Zubo, 2022. "Planning of Multi-Vector Energy Systems with High Penetration of Renewable Energy Source: A Comprehensive Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-25, August.
    16. Joao C. Ferreira & Ana Lucia Martins, 2018. "Building a Community of Users for Open Market Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-21, September.
    17. Ali Darudi & Hannes Weigt, 2024. "Review and Assessment of Decarbonized Future Electricity Markets," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-38, September.
    18. Kaiss, Mateus & Wan, Yihao & Gebbran, Daniel & Vila, Clodomiro Unsihuay & Dragičević, Tomislav, 2025. "Review on Virtual Power Plants/Virtual Aggregators: Concepts, applications, prospects and operation strategies," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    19. Zubi, Ghassan & Kuhn, Maximilian & Makridis, Sofoklis & Coutinho, Savio & Dorasamy, Stanley, 2025. "Aviation sector decarbonization within the hydrogen economy – A UAE case study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    20. Haas, Christian & Kempa, Karol & Moslener, Ulf, 2023. "Dealing with deep uncertainty in the energy transition: What we can learn from the electricity and transportation sectors," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:11:p:2870-:d:1668626. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.