IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i11p2684-d1662005.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Bayesian Network Approach to Predicting Severity Status in Nuclear Reactor Accidents with Resilience to Missing Data

Author

Listed:
  • Kaiyu Li

    (College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Naval University of Engineering of PLA, Wuhan 430033, China
    Wuhan Second Ship Design and Research Institute, Wuhan 430000, China)

  • Ling Chen

    (College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Naval University of Engineering of PLA, Wuhan 430033, China)

  • Xinxin Cai

    (Wuhan Second Ship Design and Research Institute, Wuhan 430000, China)

  • Cai Xu

    (Third Military Representative Office Stationed in Wuhan, Wuhan 430000, China)

  • Yuncheng Lu

    (Wuhan Second Ship Design and Research Institute, Wuhan 430000, China)

  • Shengfeng Luo

    (Sino-German College of Intelligent Manufacturing, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118, China)

  • Wenlin Wang

    (Sino-German College of Intelligent Manufacturing, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118, China)

  • Lizhi Jiang

    (College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Naval University of Engineering of PLA, Wuhan 430033, China)

  • Guohua Wu

    (Sino-German College of Intelligent Manufacturing, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen 518118, China)

Abstract

Nuclear energy is a cornerstone of the global energy mix, delivering reliable, low-carbon power essential for sustainable energy systems. However, the safety of nuclear reactors is critical to maintaining operational reliability and public trust, particularly during accidents like a Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) or a Steam Line Break Inside Containment (SLBIC). This study introduces a Bayesian Network (BN) framework used to enhance nuclear energy safety by predicting accident severity and identifying key factors that ensure energy production stability. With the integration of simulation data and physical knowledge, the BN enables dynamic inference and remains robust under missing-data conditions—common in real-time energy monitoring. Its hierarchical structure organizes variables across layers, capturing initial conditions, intermediate dynamics, and system responses vital to energy safety management. Conditional Probability Tables (CPTs), trained via Maximum Likelihood Estimation, ensure accurate modeling of relationships. The model’s resilience to missing data, achieved through marginalization, sustains predictive reliability when critical energy system variables are unavailable. Achieving R 2 values of 0.98 and 0.96 for the LOCA and SLBIC, respectively, the BN demonstrates high accuracy, directly supporting safer nuclear energy production. Sensitivity analysis using mutual information pinpointed critical variables—such as high-pressure injection flow (WHPI) and pressurizer level (LVPZ)—that influence accident outcomes and energy system resilience. These findings offer actionable insights for the optimization of monitoring and intervention in nuclear power plants. This study positions Bayesian Networks as a robust tool for real-time energy safety assessment, advancing the reliability and sustainability of nuclear energy production.

Suggested Citation

  • Kaiyu Li & Ling Chen & Xinxin Cai & Cai Xu & Yuncheng Lu & Shengfeng Luo & Wenlin Wang & Lizhi Jiang & Guohua Wu, 2025. "A Bayesian Network Approach to Predicting Severity Status in Nuclear Reactor Accidents with Resilience to Missing Data," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(11), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:11:p:2684-:d:1662005
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2684/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/11/2684/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marseguerra, M. & Zio, E. & Devooght, J. & Labeau, P.E., 1998. "A concept paper on dynamic reliability via Monte Carlo simulation," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 371-382.
    2. Tat-Chi Chow & Robert M. Oliver & G. Anthony Vignaux, 1990. "A Bayesian Escalation Model to Predict Nuclear Accidents and Risk," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 38(2), pages 265-277, April.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mandelli, D. & Parisi, C. & Alfonsi, A. & Maljovec, D. & Boring, R. & Ewing, S. & St Germain, S. & Smith, C. & Rabiti, C. & Rasmussen, M., 2019. "Multi-unit dynamic PRA," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 303-317.
    2. Babykina, Génia & Brînzei, Nicolae & Aubry, Jean-François & Deleuze, Gilles, 2016. "Modeling and simulation of a controlled steam generator in the context of dynamic reliability using a Stochastic Hybrid Automaton," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 115-136.
    3. Durga Rao, K. & Gopika, V. & Sanyasi Rao, V.V.S. & Kushwaha, H.S. & Verma, A.K. & Srividya, A., 2009. "Dynamic fault tree analysis using Monte Carlo simulation in probabilistic safety assessment," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 94(4), pages 872-883.
    4. Maidana, Renan G. & Parhizkar, Tarannom & Gomola, Alojz & Utne, Ingrid B. & Mosleh, Ali, 2023. "Supervised dynamic probabilistic risk assessment: Review and comparison of methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 230(C).
    5. Bier, Vicki M. & Yi, Woojune, 1995. "A Bayesian method for analyzing dependencies in precursor data," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 11(1), pages 25-41, March.
    6. Vasilyev, A. & Andrews, J. & Dunnett, S.J. & Jackson, L.M., 2021. "Dynamic Reliability Assessment of PEM Fuel Cell Systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    7. Heyes, Anthony & Heyes, Catherine, 2000. "An empirical analysis of the Nuclear Liability Act (1970) in Canada," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 22(1), pages 91-101, January.
    8. Daniele Codetta-Raiteri & Luigi Portinale, 2014. "Approaching dynamic reliability with predictive and diagnostic purposes by exploiting dynamic Bayesian networks," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(5), pages 488-503, October.
    9. Zhang, Huilong & Innal, Fares & Dufour, François & Dutuit, Yves, 2014. "Piecewise Deterministic Markov Processes based approach applied to an offshore oil production system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 126-134.
    10. Mohammad Nadjafi & Mohammad Ali Farsi, 2021. "Reliability analysis of system with timing functional dependency using fuzzy-bathtub failure rates," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 12(5), pages 919-930, October.
    11. Marseguerra M. & Zio E., 1998. "Weight updating in forced Monte Carlo approach to dynamic PSA," Monte Carlo Methods and Applications, De Gruyter, vol. 4(4), pages 359-374, December.
    12. Woojune Yi & Vicki M. Bier, 1998. "An Application of Copulas to Accident Precursor Analysis," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 44(12-Part-2), pages 257-270, December.
    13. Labeau, P.E & Zio, E, 1998. "The cell-to-boundary method in the frame of memorization-based Monte Carlo algorithms. A new computational improvement in dynamic reliability," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 47(2), pages 347-360.
    14. Chiacchio, F. & D’Urso, D. & Manno, G. & Compagno, L., 2016. "Stochastic hybrid automaton model of a multi-state system with aging: Reliability assessment and design consequences," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 1-13.
    15. Di Maio, Francesco & Rai, Ajit & Zio, Enrico, 2016. "A dynamic probabilistic safety margin characterization approach in support of Integrated Deterministic and Probabilistic Safety Analysis," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 9-18.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:11:p:2684-:d:1662005. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.