IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v18y2025i10p2545-d1655818.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Biomass Valorization Recommender Tool Development

Author

Listed:
  • Vasiliki Tzelepi

    (I-SENSE Research Group, Institute of Communication & Computer Systems (ICCS) 9, Iroon Politechniou Str. Polytechnic Campus, Zografou, 15773 Athens, Greece)

  • Lucyna Lekawska-Andrinopoulou

    (I-SENSE Research Group, Institute of Communication & Computer Systems (ICCS) 9, Iroon Politechniou Str. Polytechnic Campus, Zografou, 15773 Athens, Greece)

  • Kostas Chatziioannou

    (I-SENSE Research Group, Institute of Communication & Computer Systems (ICCS) 9, Iroon Politechniou Str. Polytechnic Campus, Zografou, 15773 Athens, Greece)

  • Thodoris Theodoropoulos

    (I-SENSE Research Group, Institute of Communication & Computer Systems (ICCS) 9, Iroon Politechniou Str. Polytechnic Campus, Zografou, 15773 Athens, Greece)

  • Georgios Tsimiklis

    (I-SENSE Research Group, Institute of Communication & Computer Systems (ICCS) 9, Iroon Politechniou Str. Polytechnic Campus, Zografou, 15773 Athens, Greece)

  • Angelos Amditis

    (I-SENSE Research Group, Institute of Communication & Computer Systems (ICCS) 9, Iroon Politechniou Str. Polytechnic Campus, Zografou, 15773 Athens, Greece)

Abstract

The growing need for sustainable biomass use has led to the development of decision support tools that investigate the implementation of biomass valorization methods. Most existing tools focus on minimizing supply chain costs and emissions, often lacking a holistic approach that integrates economic, social, and circularity principle factors. This paper introduces the Biomass Valorization Recommender tool, a decision facilitation system developed to support biomass producers, policymakers, and technology providers in selecting optimal biomass valorization pathways. The tool applies a multi-criteria analysis that incorporates biomass quality characteristics, the biomass pyramid and waste hierarchy principles, and socio-economic indicators to evaluate potential valorization pathways of the selected biomass feedstock and technology. The scoring methodology generates a ranked inventory of biomass valorization pathways, such as food ingredients, chemicals, materials, biofuels, and energy production. Additionally, the tool evaluates co-digestion feasibility for anaerobic digestion applications, as well as biogas production potential, and provides biomass roadside cost data to enhance decision-making. A theoretical example in Italy using the industrial fermentation process demonstrates its applicability in biomass valorization solutions within a circular economy framework. This tool aims to identify and assess feedstock valorization opportunities for stakeholders seeking to increase feedstock flexibility and reduce waste by promoting sustainable biomass management, circular economy, and bioeconomy principles.

Suggested Citation

  • Vasiliki Tzelepi & Lucyna Lekawska-Andrinopoulou & Kostas Chatziioannou & Thodoris Theodoropoulos & Georgios Tsimiklis & Angelos Amditis, 2025. "Biomass Valorization Recommender Tool Development," Energies, MDPI, vol. 18(10), pages 1-20, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:2545-:d:1655818
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2545/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/18/10/2545/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Iris Vural Gursel & Berien Elbersen & Koen P. H. Meesters & Myrna van Leeuwen, 2022. "Defining Circular Economy Principles for Biobased Products," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-21, October.
    2. Matthias Kalverkamp & Alexandra Pehlken & Thorsten Wuest, 2017. "Cascade Use and the Management of Product Lifecycles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(9), pages 1-23, August.
    3. Ioannis Varvaringos & Eva Skourtanioti & Georgios Letsos & Evgenia Rizoudi & Ektoras Makras & Margarita Panagiotopoulou & Sofia Papadaki & Katerina Valta, 2023. "Promoting Sustainable Fruit and Vegetable Biowaste Management and Industrial Symbiosis through an Innovative Web Platform," Waste, MDPI, vol. 1(2), pages 1-17, June.
    4. Rolf Meyer, 2017. "Bioeconomy Strategies: Contexts, Visions, Guiding Implementation Principles and Resulting Debates," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(6), pages 1-32, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruxandra Bejinaru & Cristian Valentin Hapenciuc & Iulian Condratov & Pavel Stanciu, 2018. "The University Role in Developing the Human Capital for a Sustainable Bioeconomy," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 20(49), pages 583-583, August.
    2. Brizga, Janis & Räty, Tarmo, 2024. "Production, consumption and trade-based forest land and resource footprints in the Nordic and Baltic countries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    3. Erika Palmer & Robert Burton & Cecilia Haskins, 2020. "A Systems Engineering Framework for Bioeconomic Transitions in a Sustainable Development Goal Context," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-12, August.
    4. Sven Wydra, 2019. "Value Chains for Industrial Biotechnology in the Bioeconomy-Innovation System Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-16, April.
    5. Xuezhou Wen & Daniel Quacoe & Dinah Quacoe & Kingsley Appiah & Bertha Ada Danso, 2019. "Analysis on Bioeconomy’s Contribution to GDP: Evidence from Japan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-17, January.
    6. Stafford, W. & De Lange, W. & Nahman, A. & Chunilall, V. & Lekha, P. & Andrew, J. & Johakimu, J. & Sithole, B. & Trotter, D., 2020. "Forestry biorefineries," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 461-475.
    7. Nora Szarka & Laura García Laverde & Daniela Thrän & Orest Kiyko & Mykhailo Ilkiv & Danka Moravčíková & Eva Cudlínová & Miloslav Lapka & Nóra Hatvani & Ákos Koós & Aleksandra Luks & Ignacio Martín Jim, 2023. "Stakeholder Engagement in the Co-Design of Regional Bioeconomy Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-37, April.
    8. Johanna Olofsson, 2025. "Multiple Goals for Biomass Residues in Circular Bioeconomies? Assessing Circularities and Carbon Footprints of Residue-Based Products," Circular Economy and Sustainability, Springer, vol. 5(1), pages 101-123, February.
    9. Delia-Elena Diaconașu & Ionel Bostan & Cristina Căutișanu & Irina Chiriac, 2022. "Insights into the Sustainable Development of the Bioeconomy at the European Level, in the Context of the Desired Clean Environment," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(18), pages 1-14, September.
    10. Andrew M. Neill & Cathal O’Donoghue & Jane C. Stout, 2020. "A Natural Capital Lens for a Sustainable Bioeconomy: Determining the Unrealised and Unrecognised Services from Nature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(19), pages 1-24, September.
    11. Maciejczak, Mariusz, 2023. "Nature Based Innovations in the Development of Bioeconomy," Roczniki (Annals), Polish Association of Agricultural Economists and Agribusiness - Stowarzyszenie Ekonomistow Rolnictwa e Agrobiznesu (SERiA), vol. 2023(2).
    12. Leire Barañano & Naroa Garbisu & Itziar Alkorta & Andrés Araujo & Carlos Garbisu, 2021. "Contextualization of the Bioeconomy Concept through Its Links with Related Concepts and the Challenges Facing Humanity," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(14), pages 1-18, July.
    13. Tévécia Ronzon & Susanne Iost & George Philippidis, 2022. "Has the European Union entered a bioeconomy transition? Combining an output-based approach with a shift-share analysis," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 24(6), pages 8195-8217, June.
    14. Stefan Bößner & Francis X. Johnson & Zoha Shawoo, 2020. "Governing the Bioeconomy: What Role for International Institutions?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-24, December.
    15. Juha Peltomaa, 2018. "Drumming the Barrels of Hope? Bioeconomy Narratives in the Media," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-14, November.
    16. Durwin H.J. Lynch & Pim Klaassen & Lan van Wassenaer & Jacqueline E.W. Broerse, 2020. "Constructing the Public in Roadmapping the Transition to a Bioeconomy: A Case Study from the Netherlands," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(8), pages 1-18, April.
    17. Luke Kelleher & Maeve Henchion & Eoin O’Neill, 2019. "Policy Coherence and the Transition to a Bioeconomy: The Case of Ireland," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    18. Tobias Stern & Ursula Ploll & Raphael Spies & Peter Schwarzbauer & Franziska Hesser & Lea Ranacher, 2018. "Understanding Perceptions of the Bioeconomy in Austria—An Explorative Case Study," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(11), pages 1-17, November.
    19. Lena Jarosch & Walther Zeug & Alberto Bezama & Matthias Finkbeiner & Daniela Thrän, 2020. "A Regional Socio-Economic Life Cycle Assessment of a Bioeconomy Value Chain," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(3), pages 1-15, February.
    20. Carmen Priefer & Rolf Meyer, 2019. "One Concept, Many Opinions: How Scientists in Germany Think About the Concept of Bioeconomy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:18:y:2025:i:10:p:2545-:d:1655818. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.