IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v17y2024i17p4381-d1469166.html

Assessing Decarbonization Approaches across Major Economies

Author

Listed:
  • Andrea Tick

    (Keleti Károly Faculty of Business and Management, Óbuda University, Tavaszmező Str. 15-17, 1084 Budapest, Hungary)

  • Askar Akaev

    (Faculty of Global Processes, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Ulitsa Kolmogorova, 1, 119991 Moscow, Russia)

  • Tessaleno Campos Devezas

    (Engineering Faculty, Atlântica Instituto Universitário, 2730-036 Barcarena, Portugal)

  • Askar Sarygulov

    (Center for Interdisciplinary Research and Education on Technological and Economic Problems of Energy Transition, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politekhnicheskaya Ulitsa, 29, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Alexander Petryakov

    (Department of Finance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, Krapivnyy Pereulok, No. 5, 194044 St. Petersburg, Russia)

  • Anufriev Igor Evgenevich

    (Higher School of Applied Mathematics and Computational Physics, Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, Politekhnicheskaya Ulitsa, 29, 195251 St. Petersburg, Russia)

Abstract

The global energy transition is an uneven process, fundamentally related to the level of economic development of countries and their access to energy resources (renewable and non-renewable) to a large extent. The global climate is interconnected, and all nations impact it through their products and services. The six countries discussed—China, Brazil, Germany, Japan, Russia, and India—account for 44.8% of global primary energy consumption and 49% of global CO 2 emissions. Each of them has its own strategy for achieving carbon neutrality, based on different decarbonization scenarios, which, according to the authors, depend on geopolitical factors, national economy characteristics, and the established pragmatic goals and objectives. However, the “green agenda” itself may not always be among the top priorities when formulating energy strategies. The study objective is to analyze the feasibility of the stated goals in these countries using a combined logistic curve-based forecasting tool for predicting solar and wind production as well as investment volumes. It aims to justify the relation between solar and wind energy production and investment policies using a calculated technological coefficient. Results show similar, but time-shifted fluctuating investment dynamics in solar and wind energy trends in Japan, Germany and China, with Germany and Japan outperforming investment forecasts when considering the technology efficiency coefficient. Furthermore, the findings highlight the overwhelming appreciation of the unevenness of the green transition process, which will consequently make it impossible to meet the goals of the Paris Agreement until 2050. Taking these factors into consideration, exploratory decarbonization scenarios for these six major world economies alongside two dimensions, namely, the pace of green transition versus green technology and versus resources, are presented.

Suggested Citation

  • Andrea Tick & Askar Akaev & Tessaleno Campos Devezas & Askar Sarygulov & Alexander Petryakov & Anufriev Igor Evgenevich, 2024. "Assessing Decarbonization Approaches across Major Economies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(17), pages 1-33, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4381-:d:1469166
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4381/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/17/17/4381/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Zhanren & Karimi, Mohammad Sharif & Weerasinghe, Naveen Mahasen & Bilan, Yuriy & Shahzad, U., 2024. "Interplay between economic progress, carbon emissions and energy prices on green energy adoption: Evidence from USA and Germany in context of sustainability," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Igor E. Anufriev & Bulat Khusainov & Andrea Tick & Tessaleno Devezas & Askar Sarygulov & Sholpan Kaimoldina, 2025. "Mathematical Model for Assessing New, Non-Fossil Fuel Technological Products (Li-Ion Batteries and Electric Vehicle)," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(1), pages 1-27, January.
    2. Imran, Muhammad & Shah, Syed Tahir Hussain & Asif, Muhammad & Ahmad, Ishfaq & Zaman, Khalid, 2025. "Asymmetric impacts of outward foreign investment flows and green energy demand on global carbon emissions: evidence from the world's top five emitters," Innovation and Green Development, Elsevier, vol. 4(5).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Liu, Xiaoxi & Zhan, Yunqiu & Si, Dingwen & Wang, Zhen, 2025. "Navigating renewable technological innovations and green supply chain management: Crafting a novel framework for boosting ecological quality in China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    2. Wang, Kai-Hua & Li, Shu-Mei & Lobonţ, Oana-Ramona & Moldovan, Nicoleta-Claudia, 2025. "Is Green innovation the “Golden Ticket” in achieving energy security and sustainable development?," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 297-314.
    3. Saqib Munir & Muhammad Khalid Anser & Aqil Waqar Khan & Md Shabbir Alam & Alamzeb Aamir & Khalid Zaman, 2025. "Powering the transition: geoscientific insights and policy levers for global renewable energy investment, pricing reforms and decarbonization pathways towards SDG 7 and SDG 13," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 11(1), pages 1-20, December.
    4. Valentin Marian Antohi & Costinela Fortea & Monica Laura Zlati & Laurentiu Nicolae Pricope & Alina Meca, 2025. "Analysis of Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Factors in the Context of the Transition to Renewable Energy," Economics and Applied Informatics, "Dunarea de Jos" University of Galati, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration, issue 1, pages 13-23.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:17:y:2024:i:17:p:4381-:d:1469166. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.