IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i6p2607-d1092860.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Stochastic Security-Constrained Economic Dispatch of Load-Following and Contingency Reserves Ancillary Service Using a Grid-Connected Microgrid during Uncertainty

Author

Listed:
  • Kalyani Makarand Kurundkar

    (Electrical Engineering Department, PVGs COET and GKPIM, Pune 411009, India)

  • Geetanjali Abhijit Vaidya

    (Electrical Engineering Department, PVGs COET and GKPIM, Pune 411009, India)

Abstract

In the context of the growing penetration of renewable power sources in power systems causing probabilistic contingency conditions, a suitable economic dispatch model is decisively needed. There is a lack of research in the field of probabilistic mathematical formulation considering the uncertainties due to the stochastic nature of renewables and contingency occurrence, as it is a very complex problem to be solved. The most appropriate model is the stochastic security-constrained economic dispatch (SSCED) model for optimized economic dispatch decisions during uncertainty. However, because of its complexity, it is rarely employed. This paper attempts to solve the complex SSCED problem in the presence of the uncertainty of resources and probabilistic contingency conditions, which is a novel effort in this regard. The SSCED is carried out over multiple periods to provide the load-following or contingency reserves. In the proposed SSCED, the uncertainty problem is addressed by modeling the stochastic wind energy power source by using “probability transition scenarios”. The uncertainty caused by probabilistic contingency conditions in the dispatch schedule is approximated using a “state-specific transition matrix”. The frequency control reserves in contingency conditions are co-optimized with energy, and stochastic security-constrained economic dispatch is achieved. The efforts are put forward to suggest a new market model in the presence of the uncertainty of renewable energy availability. Case studies are examined to show the potential technical and financial advantages of the proposed SSCED through co-optimization. Grid-connected microgrid owners offer frequency control ancillary services by providing load-following ramping reserves in the normal state and contingency reserves in the state of contingency. The probabilistic contingencies considered are generator failure and an underloading condition. A modified “IEEE 30 bus system” is considered a grid-connected microgrid for testing the proposed SSCED. The results show that the greater the flexibility of the resources, the greater the technical and economic benefits. The increase in ramping flexibility of a wind source results in almost an 8.1% reduction in operational costs compared to the base case. The contingency condition analysis shows that the presence of ramping reserves in the system enhances the power system performance, avoiding the cascading effects that ultimately cause a power system failure.

Suggested Citation

  • Kalyani Makarand Kurundkar & Geetanjali Abhijit Vaidya, 2023. "Stochastic Security-Constrained Economic Dispatch of Load-Following and Contingency Reserves Ancillary Service Using a Grid-Connected Microgrid during Uncertainty," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-25, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2607-:d:1092860
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/6/2607/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/6/2607/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ekata Kaushik & Vivek Prakash & Om Prakash Mahela & Baseem Khan & Adel El-Shahat & Almoataz Y. Abdelaziz, 2022. "Comprehensive Overview of Power System Flexibility during the Scenario of High Penetration of Renewable Energy in Utility Grid," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-29, January.
    2. Konstantinos Oureilidis & Kyriaki-Nefeli Malamaki & Konstantinos Gallos & Achilleas Tsitsimelis & Christos Dikaiakos & Spyros Gkavanoudis & Milos Cvetkovic & Juan Manuel Mauricio & Jose Maria Maza Ort, 2020. "Ancillary Services Market Design in Distribution Networks: Review and Identification of Barriers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-44, February.
    3. Pengwei Cong & Wei Tang & Lu Zhang & Bo Zhang & Yongxiang Cai, 2017. "Day-Ahead Active Power Scheduling in Active Distribution Network Considering Renewable Energy Generation Forecast Errors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(9), pages 1-20, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eid Gul & Giorgio Baldinelli & Pietro Bartocci, 2022. "Energy Transition: Renewable Energy-Based Combined Heat and Power Optimization Model for Distributed Communities," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-18, September.
    2. Feras Alasali & Mohammad Salameh & Ali Semrin & Khaled Nusair & Naser El-Naily & William Holderbaum, 2022. "Optimal Controllers and Configurations of 100% PV and Energy Storage Systems for a Microgrid: The Case Study of a Small Town in Jordan," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, July.
    3. Theofilos A. Papadopoulos & Kalliopi D. Pippi & Georgios A. Barzegkar-Ntovom & Eleftherios O. Kontis & Angelos I. Nousdilis & Christos L. Athanasiadis & Georgios C. Kryonidis, 2023. "Validation of a Holistic System for Operational Analysis and Provision of Ancillary Services in Active Distribution Networks," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(6), pages 1-27, March.
    4. Richard P. van Leeuwen & Annelies E. Boerman & Edmund W. Schaefer & Gerwin Hoogsteen & Yashar S. Hajimolana, 2022. "Model Supported Business Case Scenario Analysis for Decentral Hydrogen Conversion, Storage and Consumption within Energy Hubs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-22, March.
    5. David Granados-Lieberman, 2020. "Global Harmonic Parameters for Estimation of Power Quality Indices: An Approach for PMUs," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(9), pages 1-17, May.
    6. Nemanja Mišljenović & Matej Žnidarec & Goran Knežević & Damir Šljivac & Andreas Sumper, 2023. "A Review of Energy Management Systems and Organizational Structures of Prosumers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-32, March.
    7. Pedro, Andressa & Krutnik, Mikolaj & Yadack, Van Malcolm & Pereira, Lucas & Morais, Hugo, 2023. "Opportunities and challenges for small-scale flexibility in European electricity markets," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    8. Xiao Han & Ming Zhou & Gengyin Li & Kwang Y. Lee, 2017. "Optimal Dispatching of Active Distribution Networks Based on Load Equilibrium," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(12), pages 1-17, December.
    9. Yu Zhang & Xiaohui Song & Yong Li & Zilong Zeng & Chenchen Yong & Denis Sidorov & Xia Lv, 2020. "Two-Stage Active and Reactive Power Coordinated Optimal Dispatch for Active Distribution Network Considering Load Flexibility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(22), pages 1-13, November.
    10. Frauke Oest & Malin Radtke & Marita Blank-Babazadeh & Stefanie Holly & Sebastian Lehnhoff, 2021. "Evaluation of Communication Infrastructures for Distributed Optimization of Virtual Power Plant Schedules," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-20, February.
    11. Chong Chen & Xuan Zhou & Xiaowei Yang & Zhiheng He & Zhuo Li & Zhengtian Li & Xiangning Lin & Ting Wen & Yixin Zhuo & Ning Tong, 2018. "Collaborative Optimal Pricing and Day-Ahead and Intra-Day Integrative Dispatch of the Active Distribution Network with Multi-Type Active Loads," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-22, April.
    12. Paolo Scarabaggio & Raffaele Carli & Graziana Cavone & Mariagrazia Dotoli, 2020. "Smart Control Strategies for Primary Frequency Regulation through Electric Vehicles: A Battery Degradation Perspective," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-19, September.
    13. Panagiotis Fragkos & Francesco Dalla Longa & Eleftheria Zisarou & Bob van der Zwaan & Anastasis Giannousakis & Amir Fattahi, 2023. "Exploring Model-Based Decarbonization and Energy Efficiency Scenarios with PROMETHEUS and TIAM-ECN," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.
    14. Juan C. Sarmiento-Vintimilla & Esther Torres & Dunixe Marene Larruskain & María José Pérez-Molina, 2022. "Applications, Operational Architectures and Development of Virtual Power Plants as a Strategy to Facilitate the Integration of Distributed Energy Resources," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-28, January.
    15. Sevdari, Kristian & Calearo, Lisa & Andersen, Peter Bach & Marinelli, Mattia, 2022. "Ancillary services and electric vehicles: An overview from charging clusters and chargers technology perspectives," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 167(C).
    16. Victor-Gallardo, Luis & Quirós-Tortós, Jairo, 2023. "Techno-economic comparison of centralized and distributed power generation to support large-scale transport electrification in Costa Rica," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 120-138.
    17. Alvaro Carreno & Marcelo Perez & Carlos Baier & Alex Huang & Sanjay Rajendran & Mariusz Malinowski, 2021. "Configurations, Power Topologies and Applications of Hybrid Distribution Transformers," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(5), pages 1-35, February.
    18. Gržanić, M. & Capuder, T. & Zhang, N. & Huang, W., 2022. "Prosumers as active market participants: A systematic review of evolution of opportunities, models and challenges," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 154(C).
    19. Manuel Barragán-Villarejo & Francisco de Paula García-López & Alejandro Marano-Marcolini & José María Maza-Ortega, 2020. "Power System Hardware in the Loop (PSHIL): A Holistic Testing Approach for Smart Grid Technologies," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-22, July.
    20. Kryonidis, Georgios C. & Kontis, Eleftherios O. & Papadopoulos, Theofilos A. & Pippi, Kalliopi D. & Nousdilis, Angelos I. & Barzegkar-Ntovom, Georgios A. & Boubaris, Alexandros D. & Papanikolaou, Nick, 2021. "Ancillary services in active distribution networks: A review of technological trends from operational and online analysis perspective," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:6:p:2607-:d:1092860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.