IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i4p1662-d1060669.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Geothermal Potential of Hot Dry Rock in South-East Baltic Basin Countries—A Review

Author

Listed:
  • Rafał Moska

    (Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, 25A Lubicz Str., 31-503 Krakow, Poland)

  • Krzysztof Labus

    (Faculty of Mining, Safety Engineering and Industrial Automation, Silesian University of Technology, 2 Akademicka Str., 44-100 Gliwice, Poland)

  • Piotr Kasza

    (Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, 25A Lubicz Str., 31-503 Krakow, Poland)

  • Agnieszka Moska

    (Oil and Gas Institute—National Research Institute, 25A Lubicz Str., 31-503 Krakow, Poland)

Abstract

The beginning of 2022 was a time of major changes in the perception of energy availability and security in European countries. The aggression of Russia against Ukraine destabilizing the European energy economy, combined with the withdrawal from fossil fuels which has been going on for a dozen years, has strengthened activities to introduce new energy technologies based on renewable energy sources. One of the most promising and stable sources of renewable energy is geothermal energy, in particular enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) in hot dry rocks (HDR). These deposits occur at a great depth in almost every place on Earth, but due to their low permeability, they require hydraulic fracturing, which results in high investment costs. This technology has been developed for several decades. The current situation in Europe seems to confirm that its rapid development to a level that guarantees stable and profitable operation is crucial. This is of particular importance in the case of former member states of the economic zone of the Council for Mutual Economic Assistance, which until recently were heavily dependent on Russian energy. This review, based on the latest available data, covers potential HDR prospective areas in the countries of the south-eastern Baltic basin, including Lithuania, Latvia, Estonia and Poland. It is specific to this region that the original heat flux density is lower as a result of the paleoclimatic effect associated with the youngest ice age; however, thermal conditions do not deviate too much compared to western Europe, especially Rhine Graben, and significantly exceed the conditions of Finland, where an EGS project is currently being operated. In Lithuania, the most prospective area is the ZNI intrusion (south of Klaipeda), characterized by a geothermal gradient of up to 40 °C/1000 m. In addition, the Precambrian batholith south of Liepāja (Latvia) and the Rapakivi granites in the north and center of Estonia are promising EGS sites. Poland has relatively the most explored EGS potential, in both volcanic, crystalline and sedimentary rocks, especially in the area of the Szczecin Trough, Gorzów Block, Moglino-Łódź Trough and Karkonosze Mountains. Unfortunately, local tectonic conditions, in particular the development of faults and natural fracture zones that affect the directions of fracture propagation during hydraulic fracturing, have not been sufficiently recognized, which is one of the main barriers to the expansion of EGS pilot projects in these countries. These issues present challenges for the researchers, especially in terms of petrophysical analyses of rocks in target zones and local stress conditions, which have a key impact on fracturing operations and profitability of the systems. Despite high investment costs on the one hand and a significant slowdown in the global economy in 2022 on the other, it remains hopeful that the authorities of individual countries will decide to accelerate research work, leading to the implementation of pilot projects of EGS installations, and that this technology will be further improved to ensure a stable clean energy supply.

Suggested Citation

  • Rafał Moska & Krzysztof Labus & Piotr Kasza & Agnieszka Moska, 2023. "Geothermal Potential of Hot Dry Rock in South-East Baltic Basin Countries—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(4), pages 1-18, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:1662-:d:1060669
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/1662/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/4/1662/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Lu, Shyi-Min, 2018. "A global review of enhanced geothermal system (EGS)," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P2), pages 2902-2921.
    2. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Anna Sobczak & Dariusz Soboń, 2022. "The Potential and Development of the Geothermal Energy Market in Poland and the Baltic States—Selected Aspects," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-20, June.
    3. Rafał Moska & Krzysztof Labus & Piotr Kasza, 2021. "Hydraulic Fracturing in Enhanced Geothermal Systems—Field, Tectonic and Rock Mechanics Conditions—A Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-24, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jingchen Ma & Zhe Liu & Zhi Wang & Shuai Guo & Xian Liu & Yibin Huang, 2024. "The Influence of Different Mining Modes on the Heat Extraction Performance of Hydrothermal Geothermal Energy," Energies, MDPI, vol. 17(8), pages 1-16, April.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Jizhe Guo & Zengchao Feng & Xuecheng Li, 2023. "Shear Strength and Energy Evolution of Granite under Real-Time Temperature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, May.
    2. Wang, Gaosheng & Song, Xianzhi & Shi, Yu & Yang, Ruiyue & Yulong, Feixue & Zheng, Rui & Li, Jiacheng, 2021. "Heat extraction analysis of a novel multilateral-well coaxial closed-loop geothermal system," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 974-986.
    3. Zhang, Bo & Guo, Tiankui & Qu, Zhanqing & Wang, Jiwei & Chen, Ming & Liu, Xiaoqiang, 2023. "Numerical simulation of fracture propagation and production performance in a fractured geothermal reservoir using a 2D FEM-based THMD coupling model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 273(C).
    4. Knoblauch, Theresa A.K. & Trutnevyte, Evelina & Stauffacher, Michael, 2019. "Siting deep geothermal energy: Acceptance of various risk and benefit scenarios in a Swiss-German cross-national study," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 807-816.
    5. Tao, Huayu & Qian, Xi & Zhou, Yi & Cheng, Hongfei, 2022. "Research progress of clay minerals in carbon dioxide capture," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 164(C).
    6. Wenlong Zhou & Xiangyun Hu & Shilong Yan & Hongdang Guo & Wei Chen & Sijing Liu & Chunyan Miao, 2020. "Genetic Analysis of Geothermal Resources and Geothermal Geological Characteristics in Datong Basin, Northern China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-19, April.
    7. Lin, David T.W. & Hsieh, Jui Ching & Shih, Bo Yen, 2019. "The optimization of geothermal extraction based on supercritical CO2 porous heat transfer model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 143(C), pages 1162-1171.
    8. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska, 2022. "Assessing the energy security of European countries in the resource and economic context," Oeconomia Copernicana, Institute of Economic Research, vol. 13(2), pages 301-334, June.
    9. Ewa Chomać-Pierzecka & Hubert Gąsiński & Joanna Rogozińska-Mitrut & Dariusz Soboń & Sebastian Zupok, 2023. "Review of Selected Aspects of Wind Energy Market Development in Poland and Lithuania in the Face of Current Challenges," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(1), pages 1-17, January.
    10. Jia, G.S. & Ma, Z.D. & Xia, Z.H. & Wang, J.W. & Zhang, Y.P. & Jin, L.W., 2021. "Investigation of the horizontally-butted borehole heat exchanger based on a semi-analytical method considering groundwater seepage and geothermal gradient," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 447-461.
    11. Ma, Yuanyuan & Li, Shibin & Zhang, Ligang & Liu, Songze & Wang, Ming, 2023. "Heat extraction performance evaluation of U-shaped well geothermal production system under different well-layout parameters and engineering schemes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 203(C), pages 473-484.
    12. Riccardo Basosi & Roberto Bonciani & Dario Frosali & Giampaolo Manfrida & Maria Laura Parisi & Franco Sansone, 2020. "Life Cycle Analysis of a Geothermal Power Plant: Comparison of the Environmental Performance with Other Renewable Energy Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(7), pages 1-29, April.
    13. Mohsen Fallah Vostakola & Babak Salamatinia & Bahman Amini Horri, 2022. "A Review on Recent Progress in the Integrated Green Hydrogen Production Processes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-41, February.
    14. Anna Sowiżdżał & Paweł Gładysz & Leszek Pająk, 2021. "Sustainable Use of Petrothermal Resources—A Review of the Geological Conditions in Poland," Resources, MDPI, vol. 10(1), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Guo, Tiankui & Zhang, Yuelong & He, Jiayuan & Gong, Facheng & Chen, Ming & Liu, Xiaoqiang, 2021. "Research on geothermal development model of abandoned high temperature oil reservoir in North China oilfield," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 177(C), pages 1-12.
    16. Damian Janiga & Jakub Kwaśnik & Paweł Wojnarowski, 2022. "Utilization of Discrete Fracture Network (DFN) in Modelling and Simulation of a Horizontal Well-Doublet Enhanced Geothermal System (EGS) with Sensitivity Analysis of Key Production Parameters," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-19, November.
    17. Zhou, Luming & Zhu, Zhende & Xie, Xinghua & Hu, Yunjin, 2022. "Coupled thermal–hydraulic–mechanical model for an enhanced geothermal system and numerical analysis of its heat mining performance," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1440-1458.
    18. Gkousis, Spiros & Welkenhuysen, Kris & Compernolle, Tine, 2022. "Deep geothermal energy extraction, a review on environmental hotspots with focus on geo-technical site conditions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    19. Honglin Xu & Nian Peng & Tianshou Ma & Bin Yang, 2018. "Investigation of Thermal Stress of Cement Sheath for Geothermal Wells during Fracturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-22, September.
    20. Gulfam, Raza & Zhang, Peng & Meng, Zhaonan, 2019. "Advanced thermal systems driven by paraffin-based phase change materials – A review," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 238(C), pages 582-611.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:4:p:1662-:d:1060669. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.