IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i15p5710-d1206992.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Simple Model for Wake-Induced Aerodynamic Interaction of Wind Turbines

Author

Listed:
  • Esmail Mahmoodi

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering of Biosystems, Shahrood University of Technology, Shahrood 3619995161, Iran)

  • Mohammad Khezri

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad 9177948974, Iran)

  • Arash Ebrahimi

    (Chair of Wind Energy Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Marine Technologies, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany
    IWEN Energy Institute, 18119 Rostock, Germany)

  • Uwe Ritschel

    (Chair of Wind Energy Technology, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering and Marine Technologies, University of Rostock, 18051 Rostock, Germany
    IWEN Energy Institute, 18119 Rostock, Germany)

  • Leonardo P. Chamorro

    (Department of Mechanical Science and Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA)

  • Ali Khanjari

    (Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19716, USA)

Abstract

Wind turbine aerodynamic interactions within wind farms lead to significant energy losses. Optimizing the flow between turbines presents a promising solution to mitigate these losses. While analytical models offer a fundamental approach to understanding aerodynamic interactions, further development and refinement of these models are imperative. We propose a simplified analytical model that combines the Gaussian wake model and the cylindrical vortex induction model to evaluate the interaction between wake and induction zones in 3.5 MW wind turbines with 328 m spacing. The model’s validation is conducted using field data from a nacelle-mounted LiDAR system on the downstream turbine. The ‘Direction to Hub’ parameter facilitates a comparison between the model predictions and LiDAR measurements at distances ranging from 50 m to 300 m along the rotor axis. Overall, the results exhibit reasonable agreement in flow trends, albeit with discrepancies of up to 15° in predicting peak interactions. These deviations are attributed to the single-hat Gaussian shape of the wake model and the absence of wake expansion consideration, which can be revisited to improve model fidelity. The ‘Direction to Hub’ parameter proves valuable for model validation and LiDAR calibration, enabling a detailed flow analysis between turbines. This analytical modeling approach holds promise for enhancing wind farm efficiency by advancing our understanding of turbine interactions.

Suggested Citation

  • Esmail Mahmoodi & Mohammad Khezri & Arash Ebrahimi & Uwe Ritschel & Leonardo P. Chamorro & Ali Khanjari, 2023. "A Simple Model for Wake-Induced Aerodynamic Interaction of Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(15), pages 1-13, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:15:p:5710-:d:1206992
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/15/5710/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/15/5710/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Li, Xuyang & Qiu, Yingning & Feng, Yanhui & Wang, Zheng, 2021. "Wind turbine power prediction considering wake effects with dual laser beam LiDAR measured yaw misalignment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    2. Guo-Wei Qian & Takeshi Ishihara, 2018. "A New Analytical Wake Model for Yawed Wind Turbines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-24, March.
    3. Mahdi Abkar & Jens Nørkær Sørensen & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2018. "An Analytical Model for the Effect of Vertical Wind Veer on Wind Turbine Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(7), pages 1-10, July.
    4. Gao, Xiaoxia & Yang, Hongxing & Lu, Lin, 2016. "Optimization of wind turbine layout position in a wind farm using a newly-developed two-dimensional wake model," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C), pages 192-200.
    5. Carl R. Shapiro & Genevieve M. Starke & Charles Meneveau & Dennice F. Gayme, 2019. "A Wake Modeling Paradigm for Wind Farm Design and Control," Energies, MDPI, vol. 12(15), pages 1-19, August.
    6. Victor P. Stein & Hans-Jakob Kaltenbach, 2022. "Validation of a Large-Eddy Simulation Approach for Prediction of the Ground Roughness Influence on Wind Turbine Wakes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-25, April.
    7. Bastankhah, Majid & Porté-Agel, Fernando, 2014. "A new analytical model for wind-turbine wakes," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 116-123.
    8. Mohammadreza Mohammadi & Majid Bastankhah & Paul Fleming & Matthew Churchfield & Ervin Bossanyi & Lars Landberg & Renzo Ruisi, 2022. "Curled-Skewed Wakes behind Yawed Wind Turbines Subject to Veered Inflow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Keane, Aidan & Nisbet, Iain & Calvo, Gabriele & Pickering, George & Tulloch, Jake & More, Graham & Koronka, Neil, 2022. "Wind farm cumulative induction zone effect and the impact on energy yield estimation," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 1209-1222.
    10. Khanjari, Ali & Mahmoodi, Esmail & Ahmadi, Mohammad Hossien, 2020. "Energy and exergy analyzing of a wind turbine in free stream and wind tunnel in CFD domain based on actuator disc technique," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 231-249.
    11. Michael F. Howland & Jesús Bas Quesada & Juan José Pena Martínez & Felipe Palou Larrañaga & Neeraj Yadav & Jasvipul S. Chawla & Varun Sivaram & John O. Dabiri, 2022. "Collective wind farm operation based on a predictive model increases utility-scale energy production," Nature Energy, Nature, vol. 7(9), pages 818-827, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ziyu Zhang & Peng Huang & Haocheng Sun, 2020. "A Novel Analytical Wake Model with a Cosine-Shaped Velocity Deficit," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-20, June.
    2. Zhu, Xiaoxun & Chen, Yao & Xu, Shinai & Zhang, Shaohai & Gao, Xiaoxia & Sun, Haiying & Wang, Yu & Zhao, Fei & Lv, Tiancheng, 2023. "Three-dimensional non-uniform full wake characteristics for yawed wind turbine with LiDAR-based experimental verification," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 270(C).
    3. Arslan Salim Dar & Fernando Porté-Agel, 2022. "An Analytical Model for Wind Turbine Wakes under Pressure Gradient," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-13, July.
    4. Zhou, Huanyu & Qiu, Yingning & Feng, Yanhui & Liu, Jing, 2022. "Power prediction of wind turbine in the wake using hybrid physical process and machine learning models," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C), pages 568-586.
    5. Mohammadreza Mohammadi & Majid Bastankhah & Paul Fleming & Matthew Churchfield & Ervin Bossanyi & Lars Landberg & Renzo Ruisi, 2022. "Curled-Skewed Wakes behind Yawed Wind Turbines Subject to Veered Inflow," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-16, December.
    6. Zhang, Jincheng & Zhao, Xiaowei, 2020. "A novel dynamic wind farm wake model based on deep learning," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 277(C).
    7. Zhang, Shaohai & Gao, Xiaoxia & Ma, Wanli & Lu, Hongkun & Lv, Tao & Xu, Shinai & Zhu, Xiaoxun & Sun, Haiying & Wang, Yu, 2023. "Derivation and verification of three-dimensional wake model of multiple wind turbines based on super-Gaussian function," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    8. Gao, Xiaoxia & Zhang, Shaohai & Li, Luqing & Xu, Shinai & Chen, Yao & Zhu, Xiaoxun & Sun, Haiying & Wang, Yu & Lu, Hao, 2022. "Quantification of 3D spatiotemporal inhomogeneity for wake characteristics with validations from field measurement and wind tunnel test," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 254(PA).
    9. Cao, Lichao & Ge, Mingwei & Gao, Xiaoxia & Du, Bowen & Li, Baoliang & Huang, Zhi & Liu, Yongqian, 2022. "Wind farm layout optimization to minimize the wake induced turbulence effect on wind turbines," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 323(C).
    10. Ge, Mingwei & Wu, Ying & Liu, Yongqian & Li, Qi, 2019. "A two-dimensional model based on the expansion of physical wake boundary for wind-turbine wakes," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 233, pages 975-984.
    11. Razi, P. & Ramaprabhu, P. & Tarey, P. & Muglia, M. & Vermillion, C., 2022. "A low-order wake interaction modeling framework for the performance of ocean current turbines under turbulent conditions," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 200(C), pages 1602-1617.
    12. Kyoungboo Yang, 2020. "Determining an Appropriate Parameter of Analytical Wake Models for Energy Capture and Layout Optimization on Wind Farms," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-17, February.
    13. Sun, Haiying & Yang, Hongxing, 2020. "Numerical investigation of the average wind speed of a single wind turbine and development of a novel three-dimensional multiple wind turbine wake model," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 147(P1), pages 192-203.
    14. Wang, Yangwei & Lin, Jiahuan & Zhang, Jun, 2022. "Investigation of a new analytical wake prediction method for offshore floating wind turbines considering an accurate incoming wind flow," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 827-849.
    15. Li, Xuyang & Qiu, Yingning & Feng, Yanhui & Wang, Zheng, 2021. "Wind turbine power prediction considering wake effects with dual laser beam LiDAR measured yaw misalignment," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 299(C).
    16. Wu, Chutian & Yang, Xiaolei & Zhu, Yaxin, 2021. "On the design of potential turbine positions for physics-informed optimization of wind farm layout," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 1108-1120.
    17. Yildiz, Anil & Mern, John & Kochenderfer, Mykel J. & Howland, Michael F., 2023. "Towards sequential sensor placements on a wind farm to maximize lifetime energy and profit," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    18. Purohit, Shantanu & Ng, E.Y.K. & Syed Ahmed Kabir, Ijaz Fazil, 2022. "Evaluation of three potential machine learning algorithms for predicting the velocity and turbulence intensity of a wind turbine wake," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C), pages 405-420.
    19. Zhang, Huan & Ge, Mingwei & Liu, Yongqian & Yang, Xiang I.A., 2021. "A new coupled model for the equivalent roughness heights of wind farms," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 34-46.
    20. Wang, Tengyuan & Cai, Chang & Wang, Xinbao & Wang, Zekun & Chen, Yewen & Song, Juanjuan & Xu, Jianzhong & Zhang, Yuning & Li, Qingan, 2023. "A new Gaussian analytical wake model validated by wind tunnel experiment and LiDAR field measurements under different turbulent flow," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 271(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:15:p:5710-:d:1206992. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.