IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v16y2023i11p4483-d1162116.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of the Incentive Rate to Favor the Energy Retrofit of Public Buildings: A Comprehensive Approach for an Italian University Facility

Author

Listed:
  • Giuseppe Aruta

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Università Degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Piazzale Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy)

  • Fabrizio Ascione

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Università Degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Piazzale Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy)

  • Nicola Bianco

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Università Degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Piazzale Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy)

  • Teresa Iovane

    (Department of Industrial Engineering, Università Degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Piazzale Tecchio 80, 80125 Napoli, Italy)

  • Margherita Mastellone

    (Department of Architecture, Università Degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Via Forno Vecchio 36, 80134 Napoli, Italy)

Abstract

The Renovation Wave for Europe highlighted the role of the public building stock for which Directive 2012/27/EU has set an annual renewal rate of 3%, which should rise to reach the goal of decarbonization by 2050. In this paper, the energy retrofit of an educational building—at the academic level—in Southern Italy was investigated. The aim was to evaluate the incentive share, which could accelerate the energy efficiency process, to achieve a cost-effective nZEB. The results show that the highest incentive rate is required for interventions on the opaque building envelope, which are also those that allow the least energy savings. An incentive rate of about 45% for the energy efficiency of the transparent envelope is necessary to reduce the payback time by about 7 years. The efficiency of the plants and the installation of a PV system are energetically and economically convenient even without forms of economic incentive. Finally, if the building is brought to high energy standards—a primary energy saving of 46% and energy class A3—an incentive rate of 40% is required to repay the intervention in about 10 years.

Suggested Citation

  • Giuseppe Aruta & Fabrizio Ascione & Nicola Bianco & Teresa Iovane & Margherita Mastellone, 2023. "Assessment of the Incentive Rate to Favor the Energy Retrofit of Public Buildings: A Comprehensive Approach for an Italian University Facility," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:4483-:d:1162116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/11/4483/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/16/11/4483/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Annunziata, Eleonora & Rizzi, Francesco & Frey, Marco, 2014. "Enhancing energy efficiency in public buildings: The role of local energy audit programmes," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 69(C), pages 364-373.
    2. Leif Gustavsson & Chiara Piccardo, 2022. "Cost Optimized Building Energy Retrofit Measures and Primary Energy Savings under Different Retrofitting Materials, Economic Scenarios, and Energy Supply," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    3. Mustapha Mukhtar & Bismark Ameyaw & Nasser Yimen & Quixin Zhang & Olusola Bamisile & Humphrey Adun & Mustafa Dagbasi, 2021. "Building Retrofit and Energy Conservation/Efficiency Review: A Techno-Environ-Economic Assessment of Heat Pump System Retrofit in Housing Stock," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    4. Małgorzata Basińska & Dobrosława Kaczorek & Halina Koczyk, 2021. "Economic and Energy Analysis of Building Retrofitting Using Internal Insulations," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(9), pages 1-18, April.
    5. Galatioto, A. & Ricciu, R. & Salem, T. & Kinab, E., 2019. "Energy and economic analysis on retrofit actions for Italian public historic buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 58-66.
    6. Re Cecconi, F. & Moretti, N. & Tagliabue, L.C., 2019. "Application of artificial neutral network and geographic information system to evaluate retrofit potential in public school buildings," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 266-277.
    7. Galatioto, A. & Ciulla, G. & Ricciu, R., 2017. "An overview of energy retrofit actions feasibility on Italian historical buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 991-1000.
    8. María Herrando & Antonio Gómez & Norberto Fueyo, 2022. "Supporting Local Authorities to Plan Energy Efficiency in Public Buildings: From Local Needs to Regional Planning," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-17, January.
    9. Garwood, Tom Lloyd & Hughes, Ben Richard & Oates, Michael R. & O’Connor, Dominic & Hughes, Ruby, 2018. "A review of energy simulation tools for the manufacturing sector," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 81(P1), pages 895-911.
    10. Saman Abolghasemi Moghaddam & Magnus Mattsson & Arman Ameen & Jan Akander & Manuel Gameiro Da Silva & Nuno Simões, 2021. "Low-Emissivity Window Films as an Energy Retrofit Option for a Historical Stone Building in Cold Climate," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-28, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mariangela De Vita & Giulia Massari & Pierluigi De Berardinis, 2020. "Retrofit Methodology Based on Energy Simulation Modeling Applied for the Enhancement of a Historical Building in L’Aquila," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-26, June.
    2. Akkurt, G.G. & Aste, N. & Borderon, J. & Buda, A. & Calzolari, M. & Chung, D. & Costanzo, V. & Del Pero, C. & Evola, G. & Huerto-Cardenas, H.E. & Leonforte, F. & Lo Faro, A. & Lucchi, E. & Marletta, L, 2020. "Dynamic thermal and hygrometric simulation of historical buildings: Critical factors and possible solutions," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    3. Wenxiao Chu & Maria Vicidomini & Francesco Calise & Neven Duić & Poul Alborg Østergaard & Qiuwang Wang & Maria da Graça Carvalho, 2022. "Recent Advances in Technologies, Methods, and Economic Analysis for Sustainable Development of Energy, Water, and Environment Systems," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(19), pages 1-24, September.
    4. Qu, Ke & Chen, Xiangjie & Wang, Yixin & Calautit, John & Riffat, Saffa & Cui, Xin, 2021. "Comprehensive energy, economic and thermal comfort assessments for the passive energy retrofit of historical buildings - A case study of a late nineteenth-century Victorian house renovation in the UK," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 220(C).
    5. Jing, Gang & Cai, Wenjian & Zhang, Xin & Cui, Can & Yin, Xiaohong & Xian, Huacai, 2019. "An energy-saving oriented air balancing strategy for multi-zone demand-controlled ventilation system," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 1053-1065.
    6. Galatioto, A. & Ricciu, R. & Salem, T. & Kinab, E., 2019. "Energy and economic analysis on retrofit actions for Italian public historic buildings," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C), pages 58-66.
    7. Sara Brito-Coimbra & Daniel Aelenei & Maria Gloria Gomes & Antonio Moret Rodrigues, 2021. "Building Façade Retrofit with Solar Passive Technologies: A Literature Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(6), pages 1-18, March.
    8. D’Adamo, Idiano & Falcone, Pasquale Marcello & Gastaldi, Massimo & Morone, Piergiuseppe, 2020. "The economic viability of photovoltaic systems in public buildings: Evidence from Italy," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    9. Martin Eriksson & Jan Akander & Bahram Moshfegh, 2022. "Investigating Energy Use in a City District in Nordic Climate Using Energy Signature," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, March.
    10. Lin Zhang & Shan Guo & Zezhou Wu & Ahmed Alsaedi & Tasawar Hayat, 2018. "SWOT Analysis for the Promotion of Energy Efficiency in Rural Buildings: A Case Study of China," Energies, MDPI, vol. 11(4), pages 1-17, April.
    11. Ahmed, Wahhaj & Asif, Muhammad, 2021. "A critical review of energy retrofitting trends in residential buildings with particular focus on the GCC countries," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    12. Cristina Piselli & Alessio Guastaveglia & Jessica Romanelli & Franco Cotana & Anna Laura Pisello, 2020. "Facility Energy Management Application of HBIM for Historical Low-Carbon Communities: Design, Modelling and Operation Control of Geothermal Energy Retrofit in a Real Italian Case Study," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-18, December.
    13. Mališa Đukić & Margareta Zidar, 2021. "Sustainability of Investment Projects with Energy Efficiency and Non-Energy Efficiency Costs: Case Examples of Public Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-15, May.
    14. Etxebarria-Mallea, Matxalen & Oregi, Xabat & Grijalba, Olatz & Hernández-Minguillón, Rufino, 2021. "The impact of energy refurbishment interventions on annual energy demand, indoor thermal behaviour and temperature-related health risk," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    15. Joana Fernandes & Maria Catarina Santos & Rui Castro, 2021. "Introductory Review of Energy Efficiency in Buildings Retrofits," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-18, December.
    16. Walsh, Angélica & Cóstola, Daniel & Labaki, Lucila Chebel, 2022. "Performance-based climatic zoning method for building energy efficiency applications using cluster analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    17. Ákos Lakatos, 2022. "Novel Thermal Insulation Materials for Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(18), pages 1-4, September.
    18. Kočí, Jan & Kočí, Václav & Maděra, Jiří & Černý, Robert, 2019. "Effect of applied weather data sets in simulation of building energy demands: Comparison of design years with recent weather data," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 22-32.
    19. Gireesh Nair & Leo Verde & Thomas Olofsson, 2022. "A Review on Technical Challenges and Possibilities on Energy Efficient Retrofit Measures in Heritage Buildings," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(20), pages 1-20, October.
    20. Belén Onecha & Alicia Dotor & Carlos Marmolejo-Duarte, 2021. "Beyond Cultural and Historic Values, Sustainability as a New Kind of Value for Historic Buildings," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(15), pages 1-18, July.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:16:y:2023:i:11:p:4483-:d:1162116. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.