IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i9p3439-d811108.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Study of Methane Fermentation of Cattle Manure in the Mesophilic Regime with the Addition of Crude Glycerine

Author

Listed:
  • Wacław Romaniuk

    (Department of Rural Technical Infrastructure Systems, Institute of Technology and Life Sciences, National Research Institute, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Ivan Rogovskii

    (Department of Mechanics, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 03041 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Victor Polishchuk

    (Department of Mechanics, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 03041 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Liudmyla Titova

    (Department of Mechanics, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 03041 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Kinga Borek

    (Department of Rural Technical Infrastructure Systems, Institute of Technology and Life Sciences, National Research Institute, 05-090 Raszyn, Poland)

  • Witold Jan Wardal

    (Institute of Wood Sciences and Furniture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

  • Serhiy Shvorov

    (Department of Mechanics, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 03041 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Yevgen Dvornyk

    (Department of Mechanics, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 03041 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Ihor Sivak

    (Department of Mechanics, National University of Life and Environmental Sciences of Ukraine, 03041 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Semen Drahniev

    (Department of Mechanics, Institute of Engineering Thermophysics of National Academy of Science of Ukraine, 03057 Kyiv, Ukraine)

  • Dmytro Derevjanko

    (Department of Mechanics, Polissia National University, 10008 Zhytomyr, Ukraine)

  • Kamil Roman

    (Institute of Wood Sciences and Furniture, Warsaw University of Life Sciences, 02-787 Warsaw, Poland)

Abstract

The urgency of the study is due to the need to increase the productivity of biogas plants by intensifying the process of methane fermentation of cattle manure in mesophilic mode by adding to it the waste from biodiesel production: crude glycerine. To substantiate the rational amount of crude glycerine in the substrate, the following tasks were performed: determination of dry matter, dry organic matter, and moisture of the substrate from cattle manure with the addition of crude glycerine; conducting experimental studies on biogas yield during fermentation of cattle manure with the addition of crude glycerine with periodic loading of the substrate; and development of a biogas yield model and determination of the rational composition of crude glycerine with its gradual loading into biogas plants with cattle manure. The article presents the results of research on fermentation of substrates in a laboratory biogas plant with a useful volume of 30 L, which fermented different proportions of crude glycerine with cattle manure at a temperature of 30 °C, 35 °C, and 40 °C. The scientific novelty of the work is to determine the patterns of intensification of the process of methane fermentation of cattle manure with the addition of different portions of crude glycerine. A rapid increase in biogas yield is observed when the glycerol content is up to 0.75%. With the addition of more glycerine, the growth of biogas yield slows down. The digester of the biogas plant, where experimental studies were conducted on the fermentation of substrates based on cattle manure with the addition of co-substrates, is suitable for periodic loading of the substrate. As a rule, existing biogas plants use a gradual mode of loading the digester. Conducting experimental studies on biogas yield during fermentation of cattle manure with the addition of crude glycerine with periodic loading of the substrate makes it possible to build a mathematical model of biogas yield and determine the rational composition (up to 0.75%) of crude glycerine with its gradual loading in biogas plants. Adding 0.75% of crude glycerine to the substrate at a fermentation temperature of 30 °C allows to increase the biogas yield by 2.5 times and proportionally increase the production of heat and electricity. The practical application of this knowledge allows the design of an appropriate capacity of the biogas storage tank (gasholder).

Suggested Citation

  • Wacław Romaniuk & Ivan Rogovskii & Victor Polishchuk & Liudmyla Titova & Kinga Borek & Witold Jan Wardal & Serhiy Shvorov & Yevgen Dvornyk & Ihor Sivak & Semen Drahniev & Dmytro Derevjanko & Kamil Rom, 2022. "Study of Methane Fermentation of Cattle Manure in the Mesophilic Regime with the Addition of Crude Glycerine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(9), pages 1-13, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3439-:d:811108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3439/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/9/3439/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Athanasoulia, E. & Melidis, P. & Aivasidis, A., 2014. "Co-digestion of sewage sludge and crude glycerol from biodiesel production," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 73-78.
    2. Andriamanohiarisoamanana, Fetra J. & Saikawa, Aya & Kan, Takumi & Qi, Guangdou & Pan, Zhifei & Yamashiro, Takaki & Iwasaki, Masahiro & Ihara, Ikko & Nishida, Takehiro & Umetsu, Kazutaka, 2018. "Semi-continuous anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure, meat and bone meal and crude glycerol: Process performance and digestate valorization," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 1-8.
    3. Lijó, Lucía & González-García, Sara & Bacenetti, Jacopo & Moreira, Maria Teresa, 2017. "The environmental effect of substituting energy crops for food waste as feedstock for biogas production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 137(C), pages 1130-1143.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mark Hansley Chua & Yung Yau, 2022. "Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) Approach for Determining the Effects of the Waste Charging Scheme on Household Food Waste Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(23), pages 1-19, December.
    2. Jakub Mazurkiewicz, 2023. "Loss of Energy and Economic Potential of a Biogas Plant Fed with Cow Manure due to Storage Time," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(18), pages 1-22, September.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Di Maria, Francesco & Sisani, Federico & Lasagni, Marzio & Borges, Marisa Soares & Gonzales, Thiago H., 2018. "Replacement of energy crops with bio-waste in existing anaerobic digestion plants: An energetic and environmental analysis," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 202-213.
    2. Ingrao, Carlo & Bacenetti, Jacopo & Adamczyk, Janusz & Ferrante, Valentina & Messineo, Antonio & Huisingh, Donald, 2019. "Investigating energy and environmental issues of agro-biogas derived energy systems: A comprehensive review of Life Cycle Assessments," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 296-307.
    3. Jakub Sikora & Marcin Niemiec & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Zofia Gródek-Szostak & Maciej Kuboń & Monika Komorowska, 2020. "The Effect of the Addition of a Fat Emulsifier on the Amount and Quality of the Obtained Biogas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-12, April.
    4. Maria Anna Cusenza & Maurizio Cellura & Francesco Guarino & Sonia Longo, 2021. "Life Cycle Environmental Assessment of Energy Valorization of the Residual Agro-Food Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(17), pages 1-16, September.
    5. Jan Sprafke & Vicky Shettigondahalli Ekanthalu & Michael Nelles, 2020. "Continuous Anaerobic Co-Digestion of Biowaste with Crude Glycerol under Mesophilic Conditions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-14, November.
    6. Meneses-Reyes, José Carlos & Hernández-Eugenio, Guadalupe & Huber, David H. & Balagurusamy, Nagamani & Espinosa-Solares, Teodoro, 2018. "Oil-extracted Chlorella vulgaris biomass and glycerol bioconversion to methane via continuous anaerobic co-digestion with chicken litter," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 128(PA), pages 223-229.
    7. Alves, Ingrid R.F.S. & Mahler, Claudio F. & Oliveira, Luciano B. & Reis, Marcelo M. & Bassin, João P., 2022. "Investigating the effect of crude glycerol from biodiesel industry on the anaerobic co-digestion of sewage sludge and food waste in ternary mixtures," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    8. Suparmaniam, Uganeeswary & Lam, Man Kee & Uemura, Yoshimitsu & Lim, Jun Wei & Lee, Keat Teong & Shuit, Siew Hoong, 2019. "Insights into the microalgae cultivation technology and harvesting process for biofuel production: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 115(C).
    9. Hashemi, Seyed Sajad & Karimi, Keikhosro & Mirmohamadsadeghi, Safoora, 2019. "Hydrothermal pretreatment of safflower straw to enhance biogas production," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C), pages 545-554.
    10. Abdo, Hafez & Ackrill, Rob, 2021. "On-farm anaerobic digestion: A disaggregated analysis of the policy challenges for greater uptake," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    11. Oleg Kucher & Taras Hutsol & Szymon Glowacki & Iryna Andreitseva & Anatolii Dibrova & Andrii Muzychenko & Anna Szeląg-Sikora & Agnieszka Szparaga & Sławomir Kocira, 2022. "Energy Potential of Biogas Production in Ukraine," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(5), pages 1-22, February.
    12. Sarrion, A. & Ipiales, R.P. & de la Rubia, M.A. & Mohedano, A.F. & Diaz, E., 2023. "Chicken meat and bone meal valorization by hydrothermal treatment and anaerobic digestion: Biofuel production and nutrient recovery," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 204(C), pages 652-660.
    13. Negri, Camilla & Ricci, Marina & Zilio, Massimo & D'Imporzano, Giuliana & Qiao, Wei & Dong, Renjie & Adani, Fabrizio, 2020. "Anaerobic digestion of food waste for bio-energy production in China and Southeast Asia: A review," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    14. Wojcieszak, Dawid & Przybył, Jacek & Ratajczak, Izabela & Goliński, Piotr & Janczak, Damian & Waśkiewicz, Agnieszka & Szentner, Kinga & Woźniak, Magdalena, 2020. "Chemical composition of maize stover fraction versus methane yield and energy value in fermentation process," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    15. Olkis, Christopher & Brandani, Stefano & Santori, Giulio, 2019. "Design and experimental study of a small scale adsorption desalinator," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 253(C), pages 1-1.
    16. Ervin Saracevic & Daniel Koch & Bernhard Stuermer & Bettina Mihalyi & Angela Miltner & Anton Friedl, 2019. "Economic and Global Warming Potential Assessment of Flexible Power Generation with Biogas Plants," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, May.
    17. Zhou, Jialiang & Zhang, Yuanhui & Khoshnevisan, Benyamin & Duan, Na, 2021. "Meta-analysis of anaerobic co-digestion of livestock manure in last decade: Identification of synergistic effect and optimization synergy range," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 282(PA).
    18. Khayum, Naseem & Anbarasu, S. & Murugan, S., 2018. "Biogas potential from spent tea waste: A laboratory scale investigation of co-digestion with cow manure," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 165(PB), pages 760-768.
    19. Daniel Hoehn & María Margallo & Jara Laso & Ana Fernández-Ríos & Israel Ruiz-Salmón & Rubén Aldaco, 2022. "Energy Systems in the Food Supply Chain and in the Food Loss and Waste Valorization Processes: A Systematic Review," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(6), pages 1-15, March.
    20. Shirzad, Mohammad & Kazemi Shariat Panahi, Hamed & Dashti, Behrouz B. & Rajaeifar, Mohammad Ali & Aghbashlo, Mortaza & Tabatabaei, Meisam, 2019. "A comprehensive review on electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through anaerobic digestion of agricultural and livestock/slaughterhouse wastes in Iran," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 571-594.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:9:p:3439-:d:811108. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.