IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jeners/v15y2022i3p1047-d739022.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Improvement of Intensive In-Seam Gas Drainage Technology at Kirova Mine in Kuznetsk Coal Basin

Author

Listed:
  • Sergey Slastunov

    (Department of Mining Safety and Ecology, National University of Science and Technology (MISiS), Leninsky Prospect 4, 119049 Moscow, Russia)

  • Konstantin Kolikov

    (Department of Mining Safety and Ecology, National University of Science and Technology (MISiS), Leninsky Prospect 4, 119049 Moscow, Russia)

  • Andrian Batugin

    (Department of Mining Safety and Ecology, National University of Science and Technology (MISiS), Leninsky Prospect 4, 119049 Moscow, Russia)

  • Anatoly Sadov

    (JSC SUEK-Kuzbass, Vasilyeva Street 1, 652507 Leninsk-Kuznetsky, Russia)

  • Adam Khautiev

    (JSC SUEK-Kuzbass, Vasilyeva Street 1, 652507 Leninsk-Kuznetsky, Russia)

Abstract

One of the ways to resolve the “green energy-economic development” dilemma, in which the coal industry is situated, is by the improvement of technologies and the integrated use of extracted resources, including methane gas as a clean energy source. Using the example of the Kirova mine, located in Kuznetsk coal basin—one of the ecologically unfavorable coal mining regions of Russia—this article discusses an integrated technology for the extraction of coalbed methane (ECBM), which makes it possible to reduce greenhouse gas (methane) emissions and improve the safety and intensity of coal mining. The Kirova mine, with its 3 Mt production in 2019, is one of the coal mining leaders in Russia. The available mining equipment has the potential to significantly increase the output; however, gas is a limiting factor to this. The customary approaches to coal seam degassing have already been petered out. The miners and mine science are facing a challenge to validate and test an alternative technology to ensure effective in-seam gas drainage prior to vigorous mining. This article gives an account of the improvement track record of the in-seam gas drainage technology used to pre-treat coal seams for intensive and safe extraction. This technology suggests, at the first stage, hydraulic loosening of the target coal seam through wells drilled from the surface (SSHL), then hydraulic fracturing (HF) of the coal seam through the boreholes drilled from underground development headings, followed by methane extraction from the high-permeability coal-gas reservoir created through standard in-seam gas drainage underground wells. Results are presented in this paper of field testing of the improved SSHL technique. Findings are presented on the effective parameters of the HF technology. Methodological recommendations are offered for selecting viable in-seam gas drainage technology.

Suggested Citation

  • Sergey Slastunov & Konstantin Kolikov & Andrian Batugin & Anatoly Sadov & Adam Khautiev, 2022. "Improvement of Intensive In-Seam Gas Drainage Technology at Kirova Mine in Kuznetsk Coal Basin," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(3), pages 1-12, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1047-:d:739022
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1047/pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/15/3/1047/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Connor, Linda H., 2016. "Energy futures, state planning policies and coal mine contests in rural New South Wales," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 233-241.
    2. Marek Borowski & Piotr Życzkowski & Klaudia Zwolińska & Rafał Łuczak & Zbigniew Kuczera, 2021. "The Security of Energy Supply from Internal Combustion Engines Using Coal Mine Methane—Forecasting of the Electrical Energy Generation," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-18, May.
    3. Ali Altowilib & Ahmed AlSaihati & Hussain Alhamood & Saad Alafnan & Sulaiman Alarifi, 2020. "Reserves Estimation for Coalbed Methane Reservoirs: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-26, December.
    4. Martina-Inmaculada Álvarez-Fernández & María-Belén Prendes-Gero & Juan-Carlos Peñas-Espinosa & Celestino González-Nicieza, 2021. "Innovative Techniques in Underground Mining for the Prevention of Gas Dynamic Phenomena," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-13, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Boris V. Malozyomov & Vladimir Ivanovich Golik & Vladimir Brigida & Vladislav V. Kukartsev & Yadviga A. Tynchenko & Andrey A. Boyko & Sergey V. Tynchenko, 2023. "Substantiation of Drilling Parameters for Undermined Drainage Boreholes for Increasing Methane Production from Unconventional Coal-Gas Collectors," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(11), pages 1-16, May.
    2. Alexander Vitalevich Martirosyan & Yury Valerievich Ilyushin, 2022. "The Development of the Toxic and Flammable Gases Concentration Monitoring System for Coalmines," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-13, November.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yuxin Huang & Jingdao Fan & Zhenguo Yan & Shugang Li & Yanping Wang, 2021. "Research on Early Warning for Gas Risks at a Working Face Based on Association Rule Mining," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-19, October.
    2. Zaman, Rafia & Brudermann, Thomas & Kumar, S. & Islam, Nazrul, 2018. "A multi-criteria analysis of coal-based power generation in Bangladesh," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 182-192.
    3. Marshall, Jonathan Paul, 2016. "Disordering fantasies of coal and technology: Carbon capture and storage in Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 288-298.
    4. Tim A. Moore & Mike C. Friederich, 2021. "Defining Uncertainty: Comparing Resource/Reserve Classification Systems for Coal and Coal Seam Gas," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-35, September.
    5. Fergus Green, 2018. "Anti-fossil fuel norms," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 103-116, September.
    6. Izabela Jonek-Kowalska & Marian Turek, 2017. "Dependence of Total Production Costs on Production and Infrastructure Parameters in the Polish Hard Coal Mining Industry," Energies, MDPI, vol. 10(10), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Mathieu Blondeel & Thijs Van de Graaf, 2018. "Toward a global coal mining moratorium? A comparative analysis of coal mining policies in the USA, China, India and Australia," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 150(1), pages 89-101, September.
    8. Della Bosca, Hannah & Gillespie, Josephine, 2018. "The coal story: Generational coal mining communities and strategies of energy transition in Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 734-740.
    9. Xu, Jiuping & Gao, Wen & Xie, Heping & Dai, Jingqi & Lv, Chengwei & Li, Meihui, 2018. "Integrated tech-paradigm based innovative approach towards ecological coal mining," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 297-308.
    10. Colvin, R.M. & Przybyszewski, E., 2022. "Local residents' policy preferences in an energy contested region – The Upper Hunter, Australia," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C).
    11. Martin, Nigel & Rice, John, 2019. "Coal Seam Gas projects: Proposed policy model for compensation and benefits sharing," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 63(C), pages 1-1.
    12. Sanz-Hernández, Alexia, 2020. "How to change the sources of meaning of resistance identities in historically coal-reliant mining communities," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    13. Andrzej Rusin & Katarzyna Stolecka-Antczak, 2023. "Assessment of the Safety of Transport of the Natural Gas–Ammonia Mixture," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(5), pages 1-20, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jeners:v:15:y:2022:i:3:p:1047-:d:739022. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.